He felt compelled to eat a massive cake?Stranded wrote:Did you actually read my full post?
Stupid question really as you clearly just saw Gunnarsson's name and that inflicted some sort of Pavlovian response in you.
He felt compelled to eat a massive cake?Stranded wrote:Did you actually read my full post?
Stupid question really as you clearly just saw Gunnarsson's name and that inflicted some sort of Pavlovian response in you.
That's easy. Both have not proved their worth, hence neither can get a game.Old Biscuitman wrote:Having seen neither of them play, but having read some of the posts on this and other threads, I am now totally in the dark about Fae and Cisse with regard to who does what. Mainly attacking, defending, going forward, staying back, holding...? There seem to be many different statements about their best or typical roles. Enlighten me please someone.
One of us obviously confused. I also go to a fair few reserve games and to me Cisse is more the holding player and Fae attacking. This was particularly evident at the Chelsea reserve game recently. Are you sure you are not mixing them up?Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:Every resereve game I've seen Fae play, he's sat infront of the back four. Even when playing with Cisse.
He's a holding player, who can get forward. Which is just the same as Harper.
To be honest no ones seen enough of Fae to really judge what kind of player he is. I'd like to think he'll become a better, tougher, version of Harper....andrew1957 wrote:One of us obviously confused. I also go to a fair few reserve games and to me Cisse is more the holding player and Fae attacking. This was particularly evident at the Chelsea reserve game recently. Are you sure you are not mixing them up?Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:Every resereve game I've seen Fae play, he's sat infront of the back four. Even when playing with Cisse.
He's a holding player, who can get forward. Which is just the same as Harper.
Muskrat wrote:That's easy. Both have not proved their worth, hence neither can get a game.Old Biscuitman wrote:Having seen neither of them play, but having read some of the posts on this and other threads, I am now totally in the dark about Fae and Cisse with regard to who does what. Mainly attacking, defending, going forward, staying back, holding...? There seem to be many different statements about their best or typical roles. Enlighten me please someone.
When I've seen them play I have been completely underwhelmed by their level of performance and am beginning to think that SC has been sold a pup (twice).
And it pains me to say that.
I think at the moment Fae is behind even Cisse and Bikey. Coppell clearly does not rate him. Which worries me as Coppell seems always to be right with these things.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Cisse is considered to be a similar sort of player to Parick Vieira
Fae has been described as a midfield workhorse and plays a "destroyer's" role for Ivory Coast.
It also says, on ESPN Soccernet, he is a good tackler, quick and can play wide on the left!
Despite SC's misgivings about the differences in the game between here and France perhaps its time to give Fae an opportunity as he's going to have to pick up the way the game is played here sooner or later so why waste him when it seems the way we're generally playing anyway would make little difference.
He lives in Aylesbury and is in the process of having an extension on his house (and i believe he's also got a 2nd child on the way) so yes you're right it does work in our favour!ArfnipIsARoyal wrote:Was watching Premier League Review yesterday and the main interview on it was with Matthew Taylor. One interesting thing that could work in our favour should we go for him is he is local to Reading and he commutes to Portsmouth each day. His wife does not want to move from the area so having a young family I dont think they will. This could possibly leave it with just us and maybe Fulham as main contenders for his signature.
Not if he has to take a 15k a week pay cut to leave PompeySlinky wrote:He lives in Aylesbury and is in the process of having an extension on his house (and i believe he's also got a 2nd child on the way) so yes you're right it does work in our favour!ArfnipIsARoyal wrote:Was watching Premier League Review yesterday and the main interview on it was with Matthew Taylor. One interesting thing that could work in our favour should we go for him is he is local to Reading and he commutes to Portsmouth each day. His wife does not want to move from the area so having a young family I dont think they will. This could possibly leave it with just us and maybe Fulham as main contenders for his signature.
he's on 25k, not out of our reachThe whole year inn wrote:Not if he has to take a 15k a week pay cut to leave PompeySlinky wrote:He lives in Aylesbury and is in the process of having an extension on his house (and i believe he's also got a 2nd child on the way) so yes you're right it does work in our favour!ArfnipIsARoyal wrote:Was watching Premier League Review yesterday and the main interview on it was with Matthew Taylor. One interesting thing that could work in our favour should we go for him is he is local to Reading and he commutes to Portsmouth each day. His wife does not want to move from the area so having a young family I dont think they will. This could possibly leave it with just us and maybe Fulham as main contenders for his signature.
Mmmmm, Pavlova...Stranded wrote:Did you actually read my full post?
Stupid question really as you clearly just saw Gunnarsson's name and that inflicted some sort of Pavlovian response in you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 73 guests