by Coppell's Right Footed 11 » 30 Jan 2009 10:47
30 Jan 2009 10:47by Coppell's Right Footed 11 » 30 Jan 2009 10:55
30 Jan 2009 10:55If Harper leaves already, then we have no choice with Hunt, it could be 2 from 2.AlexY25 wrote:Deadline day will be good to watch i guess.
Theres no way both Hunt and Harper will go, but seems at the moment that a chance one of them could.
100% agree actually.Coppell's Right Footed 11 wrote:If Harper leaves already, then we have no choice with Hunt, it could be 2 from 2.AlexY25 wrote:Deadline day will be good to watch i guess.
Theres no way both Hunt and Harper will go, but seems at the moment that a chance one of them could.
In all honesty i hope Hunt does go, im fed up with his antics
He read it on here I would guess....largetrousers wrote:Not sure of my dads source, but he called me around 9:30am and said Harper is having his medical today.
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2009 11:17
30 Jan 2009 11:17Silver Fox wrote:I'm not going through 40 pages but have Arsenal really got a sell on fee for Harper? He's been here for ages and surely any sell on clause would only be for a certain amount of time wouldn't it?
Anyway, that's not the real issue, the real issue is that if true we are selling the man who makes our midfield work, despite what all the 'experts' on here say
Tee heeeRoyal Rother wrote:Boro won't go down. There are 3 worse team than them in the League...
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2009 11:32
30 Jan 2009 11:32Sun Tzu wrote:Because most deals done by most clubs are like this.....?loyalroyal4life wrote:Sun Tzu wrote:Had a similar story today which did not originate in the media but is from a source I trust.
Harper is indeed having a medical and the deal is £2.5 million up front and £2.5 million if Boro stay up.
That is a shit deal if thats the case why do RFC always do deals like this!!
Focher wrote:Watch Bolton hijack the deal like Wigan did with Watson. Megson wanted him last season as well and Nolan is having a medical at Newcastle.
In a word, yes. They do still have a sell on clause, it'll be for the life of Harper's Reading career - similar to the clause York had for Murty when we were promoted from League 1.Silver Fox wrote:I'm not going through 40 pages but have Arsenal really got a sell on fee for Harper? He's been here for ages and surely any sell on clause would only be for a certain amount of time wouldn't it?
Anyway, that's not the real issue, the real issue is that if true we are selling the man who makes our midfield work, despite what all the 'experts' on here say
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2009 11:40
30 Jan 2009 11:40Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 315 guests