by Ian Royal » 22 Sep 2014 16:39
22 Sep 2014 16:39by melonhead » 22 Sep 2014 18:27
22 Sep 2014 18:27by ZacNaloen » 22 Sep 2014 19:00
22 Sep 2014 19:00by West Stand Man » 22 Sep 2014 19:48
22 Sep 2014 19:48
by Royal Rother » 23 Sep 2014 08:19
23 Sep 2014 08:19Yep, you have a point!Harpers So Solid Crew wrote:Or he could have put it into his printing interests.Royal Rother wrote:If he hadn't put money into the club but had it sitting in some nice investment account somewhere I wonder how much income he'd have had....
Still, he's had a helluva lot of good times through RFC so counting the financial loss would be a little
by Royal Rother » 23 Sep 2014 08:20
23 Sep 2014 08:20<-- Blimey, that's bloody poor.West Stand Man wrote:Very lazy bit of journalism in The Times today re Russian owners of football clubs, by Gabby Marcotti. It has a photo of Adkins and AZ on the Mad Stad pitch and then the article kicks off with a piece about how AZ is trying to sell his share in Reading FC.
by Forest Gump » 23 Sep 2014 23:35
23 Sep 2014 23:35by Norfolk Royal » 24 Sep 2014 08:43
24 Sep 2014 08:43by melonhead » 24 Sep 2014 08:50
24 Sep 2014 08:50by Royal Biscuitman » 24 Sep 2014 09:47
24 Sep 2014 09:47I imagine SJM will parade them before the next home game and hog the microphone and say something about "our new friends" continuing the Reading way and taking us back to the promised land.Norfolk Royal wrote:Why hasn't there been a press conference to introduce the new owners of the club? You'd think it was pretty integral to the club's future and important to the fans to know who these people are. But silence.
by surrounded by saints » 24 Sep 2014 13:25
24 Sep 2014 13:25Good point !JIM wrote:JM should leave RFC to its new owner to decide how the club should be run, you dont sell your house ,then carry on living in it ,do you? He sold everything , to my mind 50%+25%+25%=100% so JM where does your 10% come from???????
by Wycombe Royal » 24 Sep 2014 14:17
24 Sep 2014 14:17by tidus_mi2 » 24 Sep 2014 14:25
24 Sep 2014 14:25A better question is where does your 10% figure come from? There were certainly rumours JM was going to retain 10% before the takeover was confirmed but since it was confirmed, the only figures we've been given are 50%-25%-25%, no suggestion whatsoever that JM has a 10% share.JIM wrote:JM should leave RFC to its new owner to decide how the club should be run, you dont sell your house ,then carry on living in it ,do you? He sold everything , to my mind 50%+25%+25%=100% so JM where does your 10% come from???????
by Royal Biscuitman » 24 Sep 2014 14:56
24 Sep 2014 14:56Where are any of these figures coming from? - Have I missed an announcement?tidus_mi2 wrote:A better question is where does your 10% figure come from? There were certainly rumours JM was going to retain 10% before the takeover was confirmed but since it was confirmed, the only figures we've been given are 50%-25%-25%, no suggestion whatsoever that JM has a 10% share.JIM wrote:JM should leave RFC to its new owner to decide how the club should be run, you dont sell your house ,then carry on living in it ,do you? He sold everything , to my mind 50%+25%+25%=100% so JM where does your 10% come from???????
by UpThePrem » 24 Sep 2014 15:12
24 Sep 2014 15:12Royal Biscuitman wrote:Where are any of these figures coming from? - Have I missed an announcement?tidus_mi2 wrote:A better question is where does your 10% figure come from? There were certainly rumours JM was going to retain 10% before the takeover was confirmed but since it was confirmed, the only figures we've been given are 50%-25%-25%, no suggestion whatsoever that JM has a 10% share.JIM wrote:JM should leave RFC to its new owner to decide how the club should be run, you dont sell your house ,then carry on living in it ,do you? He sold everything , to my mind 50%+25%+25%=100% so JM where does your 10% come from???????
Don't forget STAR and possibly a few others own shares in Reading FC, The 50%/25%/25% presumably relates to the holding company who own most of the shares and a controlling interest in Reading FC.
by Ian Royal » 24 Sep 2014 17:08
24 Sep 2014 17:08STAR have less than 1% iirc.Royal Biscuitman wrote:Where are any of these figures coming from? - Have I missed an announcement?tidus_mi2 wrote:A better question is where does your 10% figure come from? There were certainly rumours JM was going to retain 10% before the takeover was confirmed but since it was confirmed, the only figures we've been given are 50%-25%-25%, no suggestion whatsoever that JM has a 10% share.JIM wrote:JM should leave RFC to its new owner to decide how the club should be run, you dont sell your house ,then carry on living in it ,do you? He sold everything , to my mind 50%+25%+25%=100% so JM where does your 10% come from???????
Don't forget STAR and possibly a few others own shares in Reading FC, The 50%/25%/25% presumably relates to the holding company who own most of the shares and a controlling interest in Reading FC.
Would you cite Bolton as an example of a club with good governance, Wycombe?Wycombe Royal wrote:Chairmen of clubs don't always own the club....for example Phil Gartside at Bolton.
Why is this toler8ed?Ian Royal wrote:STAR have less than 1% iirc.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 242 guests