No point in putting Moore into the squad as he’s injured until pretty much November then there’s no football for a month due to the debacle of Qater and by the time he’s then picked up fitness and completed some training it’ll be January and he might well move to another club then.morganb wrote:Observations:
A few gaps in number sequence - 2, 20
A few players missing - Moore
A few players present - Puscas
12 also missing.morganb wrote:Observations:
A few gaps in number sequence - 2, 20
Are we just keeping out as many numbers 2s as possible as this club has already been too full of shit for the past decade or so?Hendo wrote:12 also missing.morganb wrote:Observations:
A few gaps in number sequence - 2, 20
He was 47 last seasonNameless wrote:47 - so much for us having a thin squad !
Calculated insult to a Puscas I would think, putting after all the youngsters.
If you assume Sarr and Loum are joining I guess they get 2 and 20 ?
Has been 47 since he joined.MartinRdg wrote:He was 47 last seasonNameless wrote:47 - so much for us having a thin squad !
Calculated insult to a Puscas I would think, putting after all the youngsters.
If you assume Sarr and Loum are joining I guess they get 2 and 20 ?
He's our Eric Cantona.YorkshireRoyal99 wrote:Shane Long is a bit of a weird one, don't usually see strikers as number 7, but oh well. At least they have been announced now. Lucas Joao 9 just sounds really nice.
You'd think he would still be given a number. He will be included as one of our 25 permitted players after all. Not giving him one suggests that he is definitely done here and we may even look to pay up his deal in the very near future.Sutekh wrote:No point in putting Moore into the squad as he’s injured until pretty much November then there’s no football for a month due to the debacle of Qater and by the time he’s then picked up fitness and completed some training it’ll be January and he might well move to another club then.morganb wrote:Observations:
A few gaps in number sequence - 2, 20
A few players missing - Moore
A few players present - Puscas
Yeah hopefully it's a (good) sign in terms of getting him out of the club as his financial situation dictates now and he won't be able to use him until the turn of the year as well minimum.Stranded wrote:You'd think he would still be given a number. He will be included as one of our 25 permitted players after all. Not giving him one suggests that he is definitely done here and we may even look to pay up his deal in the very near future.Sutekh wrote:No point in putting Moore into the squad as he’s injured until pretty much November then there’s no football for a month due to the debacle of Qater and by the time he’s then picked up fitness and completed some training it’ll be January and he might well move to another club then.morganb wrote:Observations:
A few gaps in number sequence - 2, 20
A few players missing - Moore
A few players present - Puscas
Really ? Those numbers are impossible to read from the back of the Upper West !Hendo wrote:Has been 47 since he joined.MartinRdg wrote:He was 47 last seasonNameless wrote:47 - so much for us having a thin squad !
Calculated insult to a Puscas I would think, putting after all the youngsters.
If you assume Sarr and Loum are joining I guess they get 2 and 20 ?
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Humpty Jumpshoes and 210 guests