Yes but mine has a definitive heading....Hendo wrote:Ah yes, another new thread - just what was required.
If that's the case then I'll look forward to the mass hysterical tweeting for days on end, each one fuelling the next one.Royal_jimmy wrote:I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
At least it stops the utter boredom of your typical close season.katweslowski wrote:If that's the case then I'll look forward to the mass hysterical tweeting for days on end, each one fuelling the next one.Royal_jimmy wrote:I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
If the person responsible for submitting it is the same person who sorts out the wages then they might get 40% of the response on time with the rest submitted at a later dateRoyal_jimmy wrote:I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
What are you hoping to see, Andy?Andy Bernal wrote:Does anyone know if they have bushes or hedges down at the efl headquarters?
Don't think that will wash seeing as I think it's the third instance, which was recent, which has triggered the action.Silver Fox wrote:Surely the main defence is that the punishment should be made in a timely manner and giving us a points deduction for something that was widely known about last season now is unjust
The most it will be is a suspended points deduction, Wigan were late at least three times before they were given a suspended penalty.Snowflake Royal wrote:Don't think that will wash seeing as I think it's the third instance, which was recent, which has triggered the action.Silver Fox wrote:Surely the main defence is that the punishment should be made in a timely manner and giving us a points deduction for something that was widely known about last season now is unjust
I understand we have submitted a response written on the back of a napkin. It is just the word “guilty”, but spelled wrong.Royal_jimmy wrote:I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
Will the EFL read the real verdict.SCIAG wrote:I understand we have submitted a response written on the back of a napkin. It is just the word “guilty”, but spelled wrong.Royal_jimmy wrote:I bet we haven't submitted anything in response
The last occasion was after the disgracefully late announcement of deduction of points at the start of April?Snowflake Royal wrote:Don't think that will wash seeing as I think it's the third instance, which was recent, which has triggered the action.Silver Fox wrote:Surely the main defence is that the punishment should be made in a timely manner and giving us a points deduction for something that was widely known about last season now is unjust
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 401 guests