by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 15:02
14 Jan 2024 15:02I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.NathStPaul wrote:Did this really require a new thread?
Brogue is the designated thread starter and news giver here. Everyone knows that.Elm Park Kid wrote:Brogue will get upset if we use threads that they didn't start.
There is a perfectly good thread in place about yesterday's protest. You just want attention.The Royal Forester wrote:I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.NathStPaul wrote:Did this really require a new thread?
by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 15:13
14 Jan 2024 15:13I've it all now! You calling someone else an attention seeker. Talk about a pot calling a kettle black.NathStPaul wrote:There is a perfectly good thread in place about yesterday's protest. You just want attention.The Royal Forester wrote:I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.NathStPaul wrote:Did this really require a new thread?
by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 15:13
14 Jan 2024 15:13The Royal Forester wrote:I've heard it all now! You calling someone else an attention seeker. Talk about a pot calling a kettle black.NathStPaul wrote:There is a perfectly good thread in place about yesterday's protest. You just want attention.The Royal Forester wrote: I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.
We're way past looking good.Dirk Gently wrote:As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
That would have given the perception of an organised and co-ordinated group who knew what they were doing and wanted to protest in a way that didn't impact the club, rather than a disorganised group determined to stop the match and impact the club through FA fines and a (suspended?) points deduction.
The pre-publicity about a pitch invasion at the end and the reality of what actually happened isn't a good look.
The 3 or 4 people running SBWD attempted to turn a planned pitch invasion during the match into a post-match pitch invasion.Dirk Gently wrote:As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
That would have given the perception of an organised and co-ordinated group who knew what they were doing and wanted to protest in a way that didn't impact the club, rather than a disorganised group determined to stop the match and impact the club through FA fines and a (suspended?) points deduction.
The pre-publicity about a pitch invasion at the end and the reality of what actually happened isn't a good look.
I think the fact that the game was abandoned made it get much more publicity. A 10 minute delay would barely have got a mention give that we've delayed numerous games this season already.Dirk Gently wrote:As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
Exactly this. The publicity we got from an abandoned game is immense. Whether or not it'll make a difference of course remains to be seen but at this stage in the game (excuse the pun) anything has to be better than doing nothing. https://www.google.com/search?q=reading ... UTF-8#ip=1tmesis wrote:I think the fact that the game was abandoned made it get much more publicity. A 10 minute delay would barely have got a mention give that we've delayed numerous games this season already.Dirk Gently wrote:As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], southcote89 and 367 guests