I think he would have kept us up, just.Ascotexgunner wrote:I would have taken him over Ince last season. We might still have been a Championship club and attracted more buyers. Shame, he always speaks highly of us even after past battles we have had.
I think you'll find Rommel was a reasonably decent bloke and well respected by the allies.SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
At least oneof Karacan's nasty injuries against Leeds was semi self-inflicted through a poor challenge. Second one I think.SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
Apart from being a Nazi of course.Sutekh wrote:I think you'll find Rommel was a reasonably decent bloke and well respected by the allies.SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
In Rommel's case that is debatable in some ways, given he was one of the leading players in the plot to kill Hitler in 1944.Norfolk Royal wrote:Apart from being a Nazi of course.Sutekh wrote:I think you'll find Rommel was a reasonably decent bloke and well respected by the allies.SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
He tried to kill my grandad so I’m short on ‘he was a nice bloke really’ sympathy.Sutekh wrote:In Rommel's case that is debatable in some ways, given he was one of the leading players in the plot to kill Hitler in 1944.Norfolk Royal wrote:Apart from being a Nazi of course.Sutekh wrote:
I think you'll find Rommel was a reasonably decent bloke and well respected by the allies.
Wasn't McDermott the Leeds manager when Karacan did his knee ligaments?SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
If that was the game where Pugh and Brown both put horrendous tackles in on him then no it was definitely Warnock. McDermott was Reading manager at the time. If I remember correctly Le Fondre scored twice in a 2-0 win.Dirk Gently wrote:Wasn't McDermott the Leeds manager when Karacan did his knee ligaments?SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
Oddly enough, you’ve demonstrated exactly the point I was trying to make!Sutekh wrote:I think you'll find Rommel was a reasonably decent bloke and well respected by the allies.SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
Yep that’s the one I was talking about, not his later, even worse injury against Leeds which was a coincidence.LightwaterRoyal wrote:If that was the game where Pugh and Brown both put horrendous tackles in on him then no it was definitely Warnock. McDermott was Reading manager at the time. If I remember correctly Le Fondre scored twice in a 2-0 win.Dirk Gently wrote:Wasn't McDermott the Leeds manager when Karacan did his knee ligaments?SCIAG wrote:No respect for the guy.
Karacan’s injury (which massively hobbled his career) was not a coincidence.
Tetek’s injury (which seems to have effectively ended his career) was not a coincidence.
He was a thug of a manager who had no respect for opposing players or officials. That’s the real Warnock, not the guy who turns around and says reasonable things in interviews or in his columns.
Reading fans defending Warnock have the air of British people defending Rommel. Judge him by his actions, not what he says after the fact to justify himself.
Of course he didn't play a lot after that, he got himself crippled again.SCIAG wrote:Yep that’s the one I was talking about, not his later, even worse injury against Leeds which was a coincidence.LightwaterRoyal wrote:If that was the game where Pugh and Brown both put horrendous tackles in on him then no it was definitely Warnock. McDermott was Reading manager at the time. If I remember correctly Le Fondre scored twice in a 2-0 win.Dirk Gently wrote:
Wasn't McDermott the Leeds manager when Karacan did his knee ligaments?
Before that first injury Jem had played 77 league games in two years. Afterwards he was constantly struggling for fitness. Only played 36 more league games for us in over three years.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 229 guests