Awful lot of dreck in there when you see it laid bare. I'd wager a lot of clubs probably have similar types of numbers over the same time period, but have been better equipped to ride it out and probably had stronger overall squads than us.Hendo wrote:So I've split this out into 5 categories; Terrible, Rubbish, Ok, Good & Excellent
Total 83
Terrible
Sone Aluko
Marc McNulty
Joao Virginia - loan
Rubbish
Leandro Bacuna
Pelle Clement
David Edwards
Tommy Elphick - loan
Chris Martin - loan
Sam Baldock
Said Ezatolahi - loan
David Meyler
Sam Walker
George Puscas
Felipe Araruna
Lucas Boye - loan
Ovie Ejaria
Matt Miazga - 2nd loan
Scott Dann
Danny Drinkwater - loan
Tomas Esteves - loan
Lewis Gibson - loan
Alen Halilovic
Karl Hein - loan
Andy Carroll (2nd stint)
Dean Bouzanis
Jeff Hendrick - loan
Sam Hutchinson
Shane Long
Mamadou Loum - loan
Baba Rahman - 2nd loan
Naby Sarr
Terrell Thomas
Zane Monlouis - loan
Ok
Jon Dadi Bodvarsson
Vito Mannone
John O’Shea
Josh Sims - loan
Charlie Adam
Judilson Tuncara Gomes (Pele) - loan
Mamadi Camara
Andy Carroll (1st stint)
Tom Dele-Bashiru - loan
Alfa Semedo - loan
Caesare Casadei - loan
Tyrese Fornah - loan
Nesta Guinness-Walker
Tom Ince (perm signing)
Orjan Nyland
Dom Ballard - loan
David Button
Harley Dean
Tom Holmes - loan
Clinton Mola
Paul Mukairu - loan
Tivonge Rushesha
Good
Modou Barrow
Andy Yiadom
Rafael
Junior Hoilett
Tom Ince - loan
Baba Rahman -1st loan
Michael Craig
Joe Lumley - loan
Chem Campbell - loan
Charlie Savage
Excellent
Femi Azeez
Lewis Baker - loan
Ovie Ejaria - loan
Lucas Joao
Matt Miazga - 1st loan
Emi Martinez - loan
Michael Morrison
Nelson Oliveira - loan
Josh Laurent
Amadou Mbengue
Tyler Bindon
Ben Elliott
Harvey Knibbs
Joel Pereira
Sam Smith
Lewis Wing
N/A
Jayden Onen
Matthew Carson
Terrible - 3
Rubbish - 30
Ok - 22
Good - 10
Excellent - 16
n/a - 2
So yeah, heavily weighted towards rubbish, but there have been some gems, especially in the last couple of years.
On the fence about Olise?Fox Talbot wrote:Players who have gone on to better things after leaving Reading.
Emi Martinez.
If he’s on the lists above, apologies, I missed seeing his name.Hound wrote:On the fence about Olise?Fox Talbot wrote:Players who have gone on to better things after leaving Reading.
Emi Martinez.
None of our Academy products are listed (unless special circumstances). Including Tom Holmes loan back seems a bit wrongFox Talbot wrote:If he’s on the lists above, apologies, I missed seeing his name.Hound wrote:On the fence about Olise?Fox Talbot wrote:Players who have gone on to better things after leaving Reading.
Emi Martinez.
Not sure the point of the question then?Crusader Royal wrote:None of our Academy products are listed (unless special circumstances). Including Tom Holmes loan back seems a bit wrongFox Talbot wrote:If he’s on the lists above, apologies, I missed seeing his name.Hound wrote:
On the fence about Olise?
Nearly all listed as undisclosed. No clue on wages or loan fees (no doubt some of those would have been sheer lunacy too).morganb wrote:Do we have any idea on the sums of money spent on these players (fees, wages)?
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 08:04
30 Jan 2025 08:04Dai has been at the club since 2017 and in that period we have had 8 managers (Stam, Clement. Gomes, Bowen, Paunovic, Ince, Selles, Hunt*).sutekh wrote:To be fair to these players, their time at Reading wasn’t helped by the largely utterly cretinous managerial appointments, perhaps if those decisions had been decent, and so had established a bit of time in the role and stability, some of these purchases might have worked out for the better.
me wrote:Each of those managers came in, wanted to bring in their own players, some would have frozen out other players pour encourage les autres, reshape the squad in their vision. Short term constraints dominate any long term vision, just to stay up, just to pay the next set of bills. Each successive “firefighter” brought in has to do more, as there's more dead wood to manage and an increasingly incoherent squad.
And at some point, almost inevitably, you’re going to hire the absolute wrong person. I'd even go so far as to say a run of bad luck or injuries might be enough. This clearly applies to the Championship, with Birmingham and Reading two clear examples. In our case, we had many wrong people - a good half-decade of pretty mediocre managers - but what ultimately relegated us was the points deductions.
So, what I would so? Avoid that ^^^
It is clearly possible to avoid it. It is clearly possible to reverse it and build back. Money helps BUT in the absence of money, what could you do?
It's basically what others in the thread have said, have some long term plan and vision, buy the players and use the academy accordingly. Frankly, our academy has kept the squad afloat. Things could have been much much worse if we didn't have solid players coming in and some cash flow from selling the prospects.
I actually don't really care what the details of the plan are beyond that big picture vision. Differences in style will be minor compared to the bigger picture stuff.
This sits aside to the off-field stuff, where bringing everything back under one roof and maximising the income, 'maximising the customer experience', but also build a rapport between club and fanbase again.
Do you remember when the helicopters nodded at each other? Of course you do.
I didn't mind Mannone but know he was an escaped-goat for some on here. Dealt a tough hand with the dross that was in front of him half the time.Hound wrote:That is genuinely scary, and Hendo you’ve been pretty generous there my friend. Mannone 2m and sky high wages is firmly in the terrible. Nyland?
Rafael had done one after Kidderminster, so we were down to Southwood and Boyce-Clarke. Hein had already been brought in as cover by Pauno but got injured. Nyland was available on a short term contract and joined shortly afterHendo wrote:I didn't mind Mannone but know he was an escaped-goat for some on here. Dealt a tough hand with the dross that was in front of him half the time.Hound wrote:That is genuinely scary, and Hendo you’ve been pretty generous there my friend. Mannone 2m and sky high wages is firmly in the terrible. Nyland?
Nyland, I couldn't remember too much about but he was only here for a couple of months, so thought it would be harsh to label him rubbish, especially as he is now number 1 for Sevilla...
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 09:47
30 Jan 2025 09:47Hunt brought Campbell back in, so you're golden.stealthpapes wrote:Dai has been at the club since 2017 and in that period we have had 8 managers (Stam, Clement. Gomes, Bowen, Paunovic, Ince, Selles, Hunt*).sutekh wrote:To be fair to these players, their time at Reading wasn’t helped by the largely utterly cretinous managerial appointments, perhaps if those decisions had been decent, and so had established a bit of time in the role and stability, some of these purchases might have worked out for the better.
The nearest we've had to stability was Ince and Selles scraping over a season each.
me wrote:Each of those managers came in, wanted to bring in their own players, some would have frozen out other players pour encourage les autres, reshape the squad in their vision. Short term constraints dominate any long term vision, just to stay up, just to pay the next set of bills. Each successive “firefighter” brought in has to do more, as there's more dead wood to manage and an increasingly incoherent squad.
And at some point, almost inevitably, you’re going to hire the absolute wrong person. I'd even go so far as to say a run of bad luck or injuries might be enough. This clearly applies to the Championship, with Birmingham and Reading two clear examples. In our case, we had many wrong people - a good half-decade of pretty mediocre managers - but what ultimately relegated us was the points deductions.
So, what I would so? Avoid that ^^^
It is clearly possible to avoid it. It is clearly possible to reverse it and build back. Money helps BUT in the absence of money, what could you do?
It's basically what others in the thread have said, have some long term plan and vision, buy the players and use the academy accordingly. Frankly, our academy has kept the squad afloat. Things could have been much much worse if we didn't have solid players coming in and some cash flow from selling the prospects.
I actually don't really care what the details of the plan are beyond that big picture vision. Differences in style will be minor compared to the bigger picture stuff.
This sits aside to the off-field stuff, where bringing everything back under one roof and maximising the income, 'maximising the customer experience', but also build a rapport between club and fanbase again.
Do you remember when the helicopters nodded at each other? Of course you do.
So we're back into the vortex again, who knows where it will spit us out.
TLDR: Dai out.
----------------------------------------------------------
*yes, he hasn't brought any players in, but some smart alec prick would flag if I didn't count him and some dappy cunt will flag that I have. So I am counting him, because 8 managers is a bigger number, and you can pick which one of those you are.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 09:50
30 Jan 2025 09:50Mannone was very expensive and bang average, so whilst he wasn't awful, I agree with Hound that he should be in terrible.Hendo wrote:I didn't mind Mannone but know he was an escaped-goat for some on here. Dealt a tough hand with the dross that was in front of him half the time.Hound wrote:That is genuinely scary, and Hendo you’ve been pretty generous there my friend. Mannone 2m and sky high wages is firmly in the terrible. Nyland?
Nyland, I couldn't remember too much about but he was only here for a couple of months, so thought it would be harsh to label him rubbish, especially as he is now number 1 for Sevilla...
Nyland was just generally poor and one absolute howler. Another for moved on to better things though. Mannone was so bang average it hurt, but yes if he’d been a free he’d been ‘ok’. Rumour was he was on our biggest wage and we continued paying it whilst he went on loanHendo wrote:I didn't mind Mannone but know he was an escaped-goat for some on here. Dealt a tough hand with the dross that was in front of him half the time.Hound wrote:That is genuinely scary, and Hendo you’ve been pretty generous there my friend. Mannone 2m and sky high wages is firmly in the terrible. Nyland?
Nyland, I couldn't remember too much about but he was only here for a couple of months, so thought it would be harsh to label him rubbish, especially as he is now number 1 for Sevilla...
Think Bacuna cost us more like 1.5 so a genuine profit there somehowSutekh wrote:Nearly all listed as undisclosed. No clue on wages or loan fees (no doubt some of those would have been sheer lunacy too).morganb wrote:Do we have any idea on the sums of money spent on these players (fees, wages)?
Though memory vaguely recalls Aluko was rumoured to be £7.5m, Puscas around £8m, Ilori was about £3.75m and Ejaria £3.5m. Joao was £5m I think, one thing’s for certain if Dai hadn’t totally lost it by the Aluko waste then he certainly did with Joao and Puscas - really couldn’t see our scouting network recommending all this ******* dross so god knows how the idiot was persuaded to spend all this money (though we all know the rumoured cause on how they came about…).
I think Ilori was actually sold () for £3.5m and Bacuna went for about what we paid (£3m). Actually quite liked Ilori, thought he was an intelligent player and would have been suited more in the PL where you get a bit more time on the ball rather than the FL.
To be fair to these players, their time at Reading wasn’t helped by the largely utterly cretinous managerial appointments, perhaps if those decisions had been decent, and so had established a bit of time in the role and stability, some of these purchases might have worked out for the better.
Think the big Nyland mistake didn't matter in the end, so disregarded it. I did forget about the money around Monnone, so I'd be willing to downgrade him to rubbish.Hound wrote:Nyland was just generally poor and one absolute howler. Another for moved on to better things though. Mannone was so bang average it hurt, but yes if he’d been a free he’d been ‘ok’. Rumour was he was on our biggest wage and we continued paying it whilst he went on loanHendo wrote:I didn't mind Mannone but know he was an escaped-goat for some on here. Dealt a tough hand with the dross that was in front of him half the time.Hound wrote:That is genuinely scary, and Hendo you’ve been pretty generous there my friend. Mannone 2m and sky high wages is firmly in the terrible. Nyland?
Nyland, I couldn't remember too much about but he was only here for a couple of months, so thought it would be harsh to label him rubbish, especially as he is now number 1 for Sevilla...
Hein was the one who got injured and I believe the original list missed the mighty Joao Virginia on loan. Another cracker
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 1120 guests