It was one of those that was harsh, but fair I think. From the ref's angel, there is no way he could really have done anything else and the assistant at that end was at the other end of the pitch, so no joy there.Winchester Royal wrote:From Reports (I wasn't there) it appears that Sonko stumbled and the man came down with him.
Not a foul, strictly speaking, but if the man come down in the box after contact with a defender, its a penalty.
Did it stop a clear goalscoring opportunity?
Didn't Villla have a perfectly good goal disallowed towards the end of the game??Forty wrote:Decision against us: J lloyd Samuel could very easily have been sent off, therefore he couldn't've been subbed for Whittaker, who produced that magic cross.
Yes but maybe use different colours for for/against.Winchester Royal wrote:We're back to evens.
Incorrect decisions that benefitted us
Viduka's 'offside' equaliser
incorrect decisions that hindered us
Sonko's red card
Shall I keep this a running thing?
I saw the first, i wasn't refering to that as it was clearly offside. I never saw the second but i work with a Villa fan who said the second wasn't offside and apparently replays confirm it.papereyes wrote:no - twice.
Angel offside for two well-worked (is that what you meant by good?) goals - good header for the first and a good knock down for the second. But both offside.
As for the penalty - it was a foul. A foul need not be deliberate. He clattered the player as he fell - but there was no intent. Not quite sure what the rules are there, mind. I would say, probably strictly a red.
The ref had no choice but to send Sonko off. If somthing similar had happened when Doyle was through on goal we would all be adament it was a sending off. It wasn't intential, but we are being too subjective if we think it was an unfair decision. If any decision went against us last night it was the ref not sending JL Samuel off for a terrible foul on Doyle when he had already been booked.Winchester Royal wrote:We're back to evens.
Incorrect decisions that benefitted us
Viduka's 'offside' equaliser
incorrect decisions that hindered us
Sonko's red card
Shall I keep this a running thing?
Ah right, thats probably the one he's refering to then. He never pointed out that everyone else had stopped!! funny thatThe Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:MOTD showed a late run through by Agbonlahor which was called offside but wasn't. He did complete his run & put the ball in the net but everyone else had stopped because of the flag.
Not seen the replays - stuck on a slow train to Oxford. Thought the flag went up for the header rather than the run from behind Shorey.MOTD showed a late run through by Agbonlahor which was called offside but wasn't. He did complete his run & put the ball in the net but everyone else had stopped because of the flag.
That's the one I was referring to - he was onside & had oceans of space. Whilst no one followed him because they saw the flag, he had so much room he wouldn't have been caught anyway.papereyes wrote:Sorry, UTDSTEVE - there was a third one wasn't there? Agbonlahor at the end.
That was up the other end and I can honestly say I have no idea.
he wasn't onside! the MOTD camera was at an angle and so showed him to be level. FWIW I think Sonko tugged Moore back before stumbling over.The Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:That's the one I was referring to - he was onside & had oceans of space. Whilst no one followed him because they saw the flag, he had so much room he wouldn't have been caught anyway.papereyes wrote:Sorry, UTDSTEVE - there was a third one wasn't there? Agbonlahor at the end.
That was up the other end and I can honestly say I have no idea.
He possibly did, but outside the area. If he sent him off for that then it should not have been a penaltyWax Jacket wrote:he wasn't onside! the MOTD camera was at an angle and so showed him to be level. FWIW I think Sonko tugged Moore back before stumbling over.The Surgeon of Crowthorne wrote:That's the one I was referring to - he was onside & had oceans of space. Whilst no one followed him because they saw the flag, he had so much room he wouldn't have been caught anyway.papereyes wrote:Sorry, UTDSTEVE - there was a third one wasn't there? Agbonlahor at the end.
That was up the other end and I can honestly say I have no idea.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 435 guests