by North Somerset Royal » 16 May 2008 08:55
16 May 2008 08:55by North Somerset Royal » 16 May 2008 09:45
16 May 2008 09:45Not on last seasons form, he isn'tJimmytheJim wrote:Worth far more than £2m. I'd rather we kept him for the season and let him go on a free at the end than give him away for that price. Who would replace him for that money?
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 16 May 2008 11:18
16 May 2008 11:18If you were the manager of a Premiership club you'd look at Lita last season and put it down to a mixture of poor management and playing in a crap team. Which to an extent is right.papereyes wrote:Not on last seasons form, he isn'tJimmytheJim wrote:Worth far more than £2m. I'd rather we kept him for the season and let him go on a free at the end than give him away for that price. Who would replace him for that money?
Considering that he scored 3 goals in 8 games for Charlton, he could still do a very good job in the Championship and good strikers in the Championship are usually worth more than £2m, so on that basis I would say we should reject the offer.papereyes wrote:Not on last seasons form, he isn'tJimmytheJim wrote:Worth far more than £2m. I'd rather we kept him for the season and let him go on a free at the end than give him away for that price. Who would replace him for that money?
Platypuss wrote:How much would we need to pay for a replacement able to score as many in the Championship as Leroy would?
I agree £2M would be very cheap for Lita. His 3 goals in 8 at Charlton which is not exactly stunning form, still equates to 18 goals over a full season (46 divided by 8 times 3).Row Z Royal wrote:Platypuss wrote:How much would we need to pay for a replacement able to score as many in the Championship as Leroy would?
£3m - Rowan Vine
£2m - Darius Henderson (ALOL)
Like I just said on the Doyle thread, in order to replace like for like we're not going to make any money. Sell him and gamble on someone like Eastwood (who we'd get for less than £1m) or Nicky Maynard for £1m and we'll have broken even on what we originally paid for Leroy.
Not if they could offer £ 2 million and probably get the bid accepted.Smoking Kills Dancing Doe wrote:If you were the manager of a Premiership club you'd look at Lita last season and put it down to a mixture of poor management and playing in a crap team. Which to an extent is right.papereyes wrote:Not on last seasons form, he isn'tJimmytheJim wrote:Worth far more than £2m. I'd rather we kept him for the season and let him go on a free at the end than give him away for that price. Who would replace him for that money?
I think someone would risk £5m on him.
Are people sure there is a sell on clause with Lita? My memory is that we were the only club prepared to pay the £1m that Bristol City were sticking out for while other clubs were offering structured deals. That being the case I'm not sure why we would have settled for a sell on clause being put in.North Somerset Royal wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/gossip_and_transfers/default.stm
According to BBC site City will bid for Lita if they get promoted. Whilst £2m fee seems reasonable they are entitled to 20% of any fee under sell on clause when he came to us.
That doesn't make sense.JimmytheJim wrote:Worth far more than £2m. I'd rather we kept him for the season and let him go on a free at the end than give him away for that price.
Yes it does. We will not get a striker for £2m who will assist our promotion bid anywhere near as well as Leroy could. It would leave a hole in the squad that would prove difficult to fill. What is worth more - £2m now for a player with the potential to be worth a lot more, especially given the current going rates for promising English players, or the knowledge that we have a striker who is more than capable of causing Championship defences major headaches, and who could potentially fire us back into the Premier League? He is a top player who has had a rough season. If he leaves this summer, it had better not be for a paltry sum. If he leaves next summer on a free, it will mean that he either made no impact anyway, so we shrug off a relatively small loss and move on, or else it will mean that he had a brilliant season, achieving great things for Reading, and moved on to bigger things. Either way, I'm a happy bear.AbovetheI wrote:That doesn't make sense.JimmytheJim wrote:Worth far more than £2m. I'd rather we kept him for the season and let him go on a free at the end than give him away for that price.
rg6royal wrote:I really hope that we do not sell him tbh.
by North Somerset Royal » 16 May 2008 23:55
16 May 2008 23:55According to BCFC Official site there was a 25% sell on clause. However it is 25% of profit on resale not the whole fee. Here is the linkBroxroyal wrote:Are people sure there is a sell on clause with Lita? My memory is that we were the only club prepared to pay the £1m that Bristol City were sticking out for while other clubs were offering structured deals. That being the case I'm not sure why we would have settled for a sell on clause being put in.North Somerset Royal wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... efault.stm
According to BBC site City will bid for Lita if they get promoted. Whilst £2m fee seems reasonable they are entitled to 20% of any fee under sell on clause when he came to us.
'greedLoyalRoyal22 wrote:rg6royal wrote:I really hope that we do not sell him tbh.
agreed. Could hit goals in the Championship. Hope he signs new contract
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 80 guests