by Thames » 10 Nov 2008 17:30
10 Nov 2008 17:30by Winchester Royal » 10 Nov 2008 17:31
10 Nov 2008 17:31He wasn't convicted of Murder, he was convicted of death by dangerous driving wasn't he?Thames wrote:After the reaction that David Norris' celebration got at the weekend, it made me think what would happen if Reading signed Luke Mccormick upon his release from prison.
Now, Lee Hughes is/was a Championship/Tier 2 ability Striker yet he stepped down a tier as Oldham were the only club to make him a solid offer.
If Reading were League Two and Mccormick was available would you complain if we signed him and he went onto keep more clean sheets in that divison than anyone before, could he win you over? Could you become a Luke Mccormick "fan".
Would you acknowledge his footballing performance and not talk about his past? Or would you be 100% dead against the signing of a convicted murderer?
Personally, If Reading signed him I'd question supporting the club.
by Big Foot » 10 Nov 2008 17:32
10 Nov 2008 17:32by Thames » 10 Nov 2008 17:33
10 Nov 2008 17:33Don't defend him.Winchester Royal wrote:He wasn't convicted of Murder, he was convicted of death by dangerous driving wasn't he?Thames wrote:After the reaction that David Norris' celebration got at the weekend, it made me think what would happen if Reading signed Luke Mccormick upon his release from prison.
Now, Lee Hughes is/was a Championship/Tier 2 ability Striker yet he stepped down a tier as Oldham were the only club to make him a solid offer.
If Reading were League Two and Mccormick was available would you complain if we signed him and he went onto keep more clean sheets in that divison than anyone before, could he win you over? Could you become a Luke Mccormick "fan".
Would you acknowledge his footballing performance and not talk about his past? Or would you be 100% dead against the signing of a convicted murderer?
Personally, If Reading signed him I'd question supporting the club.
by Fat Leather Jacket » 10 Nov 2008 17:35
10 Nov 2008 17:35by brendywendy » 10 Nov 2008 17:44
10 Nov 2008 17:44by yappy » 10 Nov 2008 17:52
10 Nov 2008 17:52Murder is a lot more serious offence than death by dangerous driving. It would be unfair to label him as a 'murderer' as he had no real intent to kill someone. I'm not defending what he did, but comparing him to a cold-blooded murderer, who killed with specific (or 'oblique') intent is unfair.Thames wrote:Don't defend him.Winchester Royal wrote:He wasn't convicted of Murder, he was convicted of death by dangerous driving wasn't he?Thames wrote:After the reaction that David Norris' celebration got at the weekend, it made me think what would happen if Reading signed Luke Mccormick upon his release from prison.
Now, Lee Hughes is/was a Championship/Tier 2 ability Striker yet he stepped down a tier as Oldham were the only club to make him a solid offer.
If Reading were League Two and Mccormick was available would you complain if we signed him and he went onto keep more clean sheets in that divison than anyone before, could he win you over? Could you become a Luke Mccormick "fan".
Would you acknowledge his footballing performance and not talk about his past? Or would you be 100% dead against the signing of a convicted murderer?
Personally, If Reading signed him I'd question supporting the club.
by Thames » 10 Nov 2008 17:57
10 Nov 2008 17:57by Toon Toon Blue army » 10 Nov 2008 18:02
10 Nov 2008 18:02by Chillitsphil » 10 Nov 2008 18:09
10 Nov 2008 18:09by AlexY25 » 10 Nov 2008 18:36
10 Nov 2008 18:36+1Toon Toon Blue army wrote:Pesonaly I dont care what they have done in the past when it comes to football, I would be much more concerned with their footballing ability. Everyone desearves a second chance, even if what they did really is low.
by RoyalBlue » 10 Nov 2008 18:37
10 Nov 2008 18:37IMO he was very lucky not to be up for murder and if it was my two kids that he had killed, I would regard him as a murderous barsteward, even if the CPS and law didn't!yappy wrote:Murder is a lot more serious offence than death by dangerous driving. It would be unfair to label him as a 'murderer' as he had no real intent to kill someone. I'm not defending what he did, but comparing him to a cold-blooded murderer, who killed with specific (or 'oblique') intent is unfair.Thames wrote:Don't defend him.Winchester Royal wrote:
He wasn't convicted of Murder, he was convicted of death by dangerous driving wasn't he?
He was given and blew that second chance when he was asked to stop driving!Toon Toon Blue army wrote:Pesonaly I dont care what they have done in the past when it comes to football, I would be much more concerned with their footballing ability. Everyone desearves a second chance, even if what they did really is low.
by mini _dariusz » 10 Nov 2008 18:56
10 Nov 2008 18:56by Shane Long=Legend » 10 Nov 2008 18:58
10 Nov 2008 18:58by handbags_harris » 10 Nov 2008 19:32
10 Nov 2008 19:32by winchester_royal » 10 Nov 2008 20:02
10 Nov 2008 20:02Keep fishing dickhead.mini _dariusz wrote:I think you signed a shithouse player from Brentofrd on a free, a left winger......... what's his name ?
by brendywendy » 10 Nov 2008 20:23
10 Nov 2008 20:23by strap » 10 Nov 2008 20:34
10 Nov 2008 20:34by The Cap » 10 Nov 2008 20:45
10 Nov 2008 20:45Spot on with this summary. As for the comparisons.........? Earth calling Mars.Just ALOL at some of the comparisons between murder and causing death by dangerous driving in this thread some people have absolutely no idea what they are on about. Comparing Fred West to Luke McCormick is just laughable.
I'd be happy for a player with a conviction of some sort to play for the club provided they have enough ability to improve the side. After all, they'll have served their time, and will be back out to rebuild their life. I also don't remember anybody on this thread saying much about sacking Dave Kitson after his drink driving conviction which, if he was indeed over the limit, could have lead to a similar scenario...
by PLASTIC PIG » 10 Nov 2008 21:10
10 Nov 2008 21:10Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests