FAO Doom n' Gloomers: Rodgers terrible signings

[readingbedding]

I'll go to the back of the queue.

[Royal Lady]

Do you know what, you're all right - all of you. I'm wrong. I'm just a silly old woman with her own opinions. You go pat each other on the back when we're mid table and higher in a few weeks. Well done. Truly.

[brendywendy]

youre not that old RL

what are you 40?

[Sun Tzu]

Do you know what, you're all right - all of you. I'm wrong. I'm just a silly old woman with her own opinions. You go pat each other on the back when we're mid table and higher in a few weeks. Well done. Truly.

Where does that come from ?

You really do not like having your views challenged do you....

[rhroyal]

youre not that old RL

what are you 40?

However old she is, she acts like a little kid when people disagree with her. What's the point of a messageboard if you can't debate?

[readingbedding]

Why isn't he playing Marek?
Uh-huh, yeah.
I'll tell you why, yeah.
and so on...

[brendywendy]

just leave her alone you oxf*rd bullys

shes a grandmother,and fought in two world wars for you you little oiks

have some oxf*rd respect

[Royalee]

Just LOL.

[Gordons Cumming]

youre not that old RL

what are you 40?

However old she is, she acts like a little kid when people disagree with her. What's the point of a messageboard if you can't debate?

Tit. (just debating, but not on mass though. HTH)

[Super Kevin Bremner!]

FAO RL removed!

Only on there as the last time I posted about Rodgers keeping his job, the point was made by RL about his signings.

I understand that when that was posted the stats weren't as good as they are now but I think therein lies the real point. 10 or 11 games in you really can't judge Rodgers or his new squad. You have to allow for some numbers to happen and the new boys haven't been able to prove themselves either way, so why slate them?

[readingbedding]

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

[Super Kevin Bremner!]

That's right.

[Royal Lady]

youre not that old RL

what are you 40?

However old she is, she acts like a little kid when people disagree with her. What's the point of a messageboard if you can't debate?

Erm that was my point wasn't it? Just because the originator of this thread didn't agree with my own thoughts on BR and his team earlier on, he felt the need to highlight the fact. I wasn't the only one who wasn't happy, but I'm made out to be some demented old fool who is all on her own with her opinions of Rodgers and the team!

I don't care if no-one agrees with me, but in this actual instance, LOTS of people agreed with me and I was singled out as being the lone voice. Thanks SKB for changing the title anyhow.

[readingbedding]

I feel sick.

[Hoop Blah]

RL, you, Ideal and Ian Royal are three that I've noticed being most vocal in their displeasure with Rodgers over the last month or so.

You seemed particularily keen to jump on him because he wasn't Steve Coppell and, the impression I got, was that you were going to hold that against him to somehow show your loyalty to Coppell or prove that we should've kept him on after last season.

I know there were plenty of others who also gave Rodgers plenty of stick, and I can understand why, but as more regular posters and, for want of a better term, 'higher profile nobbers' you have to accept that if you're going to dish it out some of it's going to come back your way at some point.

You do seem to throw more of a hissy fit than others when your opinions are challenged...maybe that has something to do with why you supposedly get singled out.

[willz_royal]

[Royal Lady]

RL, you, Ideal and Ian Royal are three that I've noticed being most vocal in their displeasure with Rodgers over the last month or so.

You seemed particularily keen to jump on him because he wasn't Steve Coppell and, the impression I got, was that you were going to hold that against him to somehow show your loyalty to Coppell or prove that we should've kept him on after last season.

I know there were plenty of others who also gave Rodgers plenty of stick, and I can understand why, but as more regular posters and, for want of a better term, 'higher profile nobbers' you have to accept that if you're going to dish it out some of it's going to come back your way at some point.

You do seem to throw more of a hissy fit than others when your opinions are challenged...maybe that has something to do with why you supposedly get singled out.

Hmm, maybe I haven't made myself clear in the past, I knew that Coppell would be wrong for us this season - it doesn't stop me wishing he was still here, but I'm under no illusions that he SHOULD be here. I haven't been impressed with Rodgers, and yes I have been vocal about it, to counteract the likes of Royalee who was pontificating the other side! I just failed to see why this thread had to be for my attention solely - it's much better now he's changed it - it encompasses more than just myself. I sincerely hope I'm proved wrong with my thoughts on Rodgers and the team - I really do - we all want the same thing at heart and that's our club to do well and not suffer monetarily or on the pitch. It's the idiots who jump on bandwagons just to have a go at the likes of me and Ideal that I object to and this thread was only going to help their cause. Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.

[willz_royal]

Little boys of about 12 who can only post emoticons, however, aren't worth fussing over.

[Gordons Cumming]

but I'm made out to be some demented old fool

I don't think you're old, demented maybe

HTH

[readingbedding]

Vomit.