Us and Burnley in for him for £10m according to @agentuefa on twitter.
Just huge lols all round.
No doubt but we're not spending £10m on him so therefore the rumour is obviously BS.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think he could probably do a job.
Thing is in this day and age ALL transfer's are primarily short term, the only long-term considerations are financial, i.e how much can they get for a player when they sell. Generally speaking, at this level, most teams looks to get the necessary players within their means to achieve promotion on any given season. Teams aren't afforded the luxury of planning for the future with a 5 year plan.linkenholtroyal wrote:Don't get me wrong I think Shane long is brilliant and have fond memories of when he played for us but...
10 million pound for a 30 year old is just insane, we would be lucky to get 2 good years out of him.
If this is true it shows how the price of footballers is just insane.
If it was 2/3 million yes. I would rather spend 10 million on an up and coming youngster and take a chance.
He would be worth it short term, but no long term gain to the club.
Well if he's agreed terms with a Prem club I'd say that's it for us surely ...Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.
Did you see his source?Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.
Let's just hope he's under the thumb and his missus wants to be here.Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.
Yep, it is a thing of beauty.genome wrote:Did you see his source?Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.![]()
"A close friend of the driver hired by the Chief Scout at Reading"
His latest tweet absolutely confirms this as a load of old bollocks.genome wrote:Did you see his source?Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.![]()
"A close friend of the driver hired by the Chief Scout at Reading"
Why would anyone chose to question a meaningless cliché like 'ambition' ?CountryRoyal wrote:Let's just hope he's under the thumb and his missus wants to be here.Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.
TBH if there's any truth in it then you'd have to question his ambition dropping down a division when he wouldn't have to, that being said at his age what else can he hope to achieve in the premier league beyond keeping a team in it?
Well purely going along how that seems to be the narrative that the premier league is the be all and end all. Whilst I don't agree with that if he, like everyone seemingly else thinks that's the case then one would question his motivation.Nameless wrote:Why would anyone chose to question a meaningless cliché like 'ambition' ?CountryRoyal wrote:Let's just hope he's under the thumb and his missus wants to be here.Stranded wrote:Some Burnley fan who is supposedly ITK on that there Twitter, thinks it is between us and them for Long. Supposedly agreed terms with Burnley but wants to speak to us as we have shown interest due to strong family ties and would like to come back if possible.
Obviously complete bollocks you would think, but even if there is 1% chance of this being true it would be interesting.
TBH if there's any truth in it then you'd have to question his ambition dropping down a division when he wouldn't have to, that being said at his age what else can he hope to achieve in the premier league beyond keeping a team in it?
Why would going back to a club where his career started in order to help them get promotion be any less ambitious than joining a club he has no connection to, in a part of the country he has no roots in, who are unlikely to do more than fight relegation most seasons ?
It would be refreshing to find a footballer who doesn't think that maximising the number of zero's on your pay cheque isn't the be all and end all, especially when you're already set up comfortably for life.
Be amazed if true, I don't think we actually have a 'chief scout' these days.
Is this missing some words, or is my brain on the blink? (Or both, of course)CountryRoyal wrote: Whilst I don't agree with that if he, like everyone seemingly else thinks that's the case then one would question his motivation.
Wouldn't surprise me. Might have had several beverages.muirinho wrote:Is this missing some words, or is my brain on the blink? (Or both, of course)CountryRoyal wrote: Whilst I don't agree with that if he, like everyone seemingly else thinks that's the case then one would question his motivation.
Unless there's been a very recent change it's still Steve Shorey.Nameless wrote:Be amazed if true, I don't think we actually have a 'chief scout' these days.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests