He looked across to the linesman straight away perhaps looking to be bailed out for the handball but the lino’s flag stayed down. Total dereliction of his duties.Ark Royal wrote:I will give the ref a very generous benefit of doubt for the first, but under the exisitng handball laws a more blatatnt penalty I have never seen. There are now two versions of the game: VAR and non-VAR, because if VAR was there, the decision would have been made for him. I was in the ED and everyone, bar everyone was up. You could tell from the ref's body language that he absolutely saw it. I cannot even begin to contemplate what made him think that it was not a pen. A staggeringly inept decision that cost us the three points.
Do you mean a lino that was 40 yards away giving advice to a ref that was no more than 10 yards away?Zip wrote:He looked across to the linesman straight away perhaps looking to be bailed out for the handball but the lino’s flag stayed down. Total dereliction of his duties.Ark Royal wrote:I will give the ref a very generous benefit of doubt for the first, but under the exisitng handball laws a more blatatnt penalty I have never seen. There are now two versions of the game: VAR and non-VAR, because if VAR was there, the decision would have been made for him. I was in the ED and everyone, bar everyone was up. You could tell from the ref's body language that he absolutely saw it. I cannot even begin to contemplate what made him think that it was not a pen. A staggeringly inept decision that cost us the three points.
The Lino was just as gutless. He was perfectly placed to see Swift fouled in the penalty box.windermereROYAL wrote:Do you mean a lino that was 40 yards away giving advice to a ref that was no more than 10 yards away?Zip wrote:He looked across to the linesman straight away perhaps looking to be bailed out for the handball but the lino’s flag stayed down. Total dereliction of his duties.Ark Royal wrote:I will give the ref a very generous benefit of doubt for the first, but under the exisitng handball laws a more blatatnt penalty I have never seen. There are now two versions of the game: VAR and non-VAR, because if VAR was there, the decision would have been made for him. I was in the ED and everyone, bar everyone was up. You could tell from the ref's body language that he absolutely saw it. I cannot even begin to contemplate what made him think that it was not a pen. A staggeringly inept decision that cost us the three points.
^This. The Swift incident warranted input from the lino, but with the handball, he was literally staring right at it. Unfathomable.windermereROYAL wrote:Do you mean a lino that was 40 yards away giving advice to a ref that was no more than 10 yards away?Zip wrote:He looked across to the linesman straight away perhaps looking to be bailed out for the handball but the lino’s flag stayed down. Total dereliction of his duties.Ark Royal wrote:I will give the ref a very generous benefit of doubt for the first, but under the exisitng handball laws a more blatatnt penalty I have never seen. There are now two versions of the game: VAR and non-VAR, because if VAR was there, the decision would have been made for him. I was in the ED and everyone, bar everyone was up. You could tell from the ref's body language that he absolutely saw it. I cannot even begin to contemplate what made him think that it was not a pen. A staggeringly inept decision that cost us the three points.
Agreed. I’m not defending him but noticed he was looking across to the Lino straight after the handball. Almost as if he knew he had got it wrong and wanted the Lino to help him out.Ark Royal wrote:^This. The Swift incident warranted input from the lino, but with the handball, he was literally staring right at it. Unfathomable.windermereROYAL wrote:Do you mean a lino that was 40 yards away giving advice to a ref that was no more than 10 yards away?Zip wrote:
He looked across to the linesman straight away perhaps looking to be bailed out for the handball but the lino’s flag stayed down. Total dereliction of his duties.
I can only think that he thoughtArk Royal wrote:I will give the ref - and lino - a very generous sliice of benefit of doubt for the first, but under the exisitng handball laws a more blatatnt penalty I have never seen. There are now two versions of the game: VAR and non-VAR, because if VAR was there, the decision would have been made for him. I was in the ED and everyone, bar everyone was up. You could tell from the ref's body language that he absolutely saw it. I cannot even begin to contemplate what made him think that it was not a pen. A staggeringly inept decision that cost us the three points.
Or maybe he's contemplating a career change.AthleticoSpizz wrote:...having a covert dig at someone here Ian?
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 539 guests