What does this mean again?winchester_royal wrote:
There's nowt wrong with bringing players in on loan with the option to purchase at the end of the season.
RoyallyFcuked wrote:Possibly won't get as much as he would have done had we not signed Vydra, who is surely now our no1 choice.3points wrote:Anyone else thinking that Sa may struggle for game time now?
Depends what formation we play, if we have only one up front then Vydra would probably be first choice, though Sa could be better than Vydra at playing on his own upfront, we don't know. Possibly there could be a front 3 that includes both of them although I'm not sure thats the best option.
Vydra is better with a partner, and I'd say Sa would partner him with Blackman dropping to the bench, bit harsh on Nick as he's started well this season but there's no reason why he can't make an impact off the bench when playing as a striker (he is not a winger)
Say for example if Sa hasn't scored for 2 games but Blackman came off the bench and scored in the last game then perhaps Blackman would get to start in the next game (alongside the free scoring Vydra)![]()
Think we will see the wingers and midfielders being moved around a bit too based on performance, this is just squad rotation really and its certainly a good thing to have providing the replacements are good, which I think ours will be.
I don't know what the deal was with the Murray situation but normally it means a fee has been pre-arranged, if we decide to pay it then the other team must accept.Extended-Phenotype wrote:What does this mean again?winchester_royal wrote:
There's nowt wrong with bringing players in on loan with the option to purchase at the end of the season.
floyd__streete wrote:SummeROFL ROFLebuiLOLd indeed. Anyone worth selling will be sold. And replaced within the team by the likes of Aaron Kuhl and Jack Stacey.

The deal was boasted as 'option to buy', providing the player picked us, no other team came in for him and the parent team wanted to sell.tidus_mi2 wrote:I don't know what the deal was with the Murray situation but normally it means a fee has been pre-arranged, if we decide to pay it then the other team must accept.Extended-Phenotype wrote:What does this mean again?winchester_royal wrote:
There's nowt wrong with bringing players in on loan with the option to purchase at the end of the season.
And how many games have you been to over the last couple of seasons? Are you really the kind of fan that the club is really going to be worried about?Royal Rother wrote:Well I suppose it's all quite exciting in its way but the disconnect between (this) fan and club has grown again.
Ola John? Do me a favour.
Alright Maguire?Maguire wrote:One of them will turn out to be dogshit and one of them will keep picking up niggling injuries.
Take those away and it doesn't seem like such a problem, particularly with so many games in the Championship and the associated injuries, fatigue, and suspensions which will allow us to make full use of our squad..
Not bad thanks mush, nice to see you.Extended-Phenotype wrote:Alright Maguire?Maguire wrote:One of them will turn out to be dogshit and one of them will keep picking up niggling injuries.
Take those away and it doesn't seem like such a problem, particularly with so many games in the Championship and the associated injuries, fatigue, and suspensions which will allow us to make full use of our squad..
Yeah, tis true - it's nice to have a bit of proper depth again.
lolPepe the Horseman wrote:Samesies. It's annoying that the next game is on the telly. What a pickle.
Tragi-glory hunter.Ouroboros wrote:Do you reckon we'll get to another semi-final this year? Might just wait for that one.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Keysfield and 281 guests