What has this lad done to inspire such devotion from our fans? Something about Czech footballers who try little flicks that don't come off that sends you lot weak at the knees.Top Flight wrote:Tim Dellor is annoying me again!
He just won't shut up about Vydra. He is going on and on and on and on about Vydra.
Give the lad a break. He will come good.
TD also said £80,000 per game earlier in the programme - which sounds more like it – although still a mad amount.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Whether true or not TD was saying that Vydra is costing the club £150k per game![]()
If so, that is a p1ss poor return at this level.
Do the sums. If his loan fee is £2,500,00 and is inclusive of his pay then he costs £2.5m/46 ( or less if you only count the games he plays). If the loan fee doesn't include pay then the amount goes up proportionate to that.andrew1957 wrote:TD also said £80,000 per game earlier in the programme - which sounds more like it – although still a mad amount.AthleticoSpizz wrote:Whether true or not TD was saying that Vydra is costing the club £150k per game![]()
If so, that is a p1ss poor return at this level.
Vydra is, usually, a class act. The problem with the Vydra wearing the blue and white hooped shirt is simply that he doesn't want to be here. He wants to, and believes he should, be playing in the Prem with Watford. Like Murray last season, he has no feeling or affinity for our club. He is just another example of why the loan system doesn't work.sandman wrote: What has this lad done to inspire such devotion from our fans? Something about Czech footballers who try little flicks that don't come off that sends you lot weak at the knees.
He is missing chance after chance, week after week, despite so many saying "put him through and provide him with chances and he'll come good". You bring him in with his record at this level at Watford to do one thing and that is to score the goals that will get us promoted. He is not doing it and 12 points off the play offs it's becoming increasingly likely that he will not do it.
Dellor may be strong with the criticism but he, like all of us as Reading fans, genuinely want Vydra to make the difference where he was brought in to make the difference.
But he doesn't does he. He claimed Vydra missed his sitter today from 8 yards. Gooding then says it was at least as far out as the penalty spot and might have even been 14 yards. He also claimed that 10,000 of the crowd would have hit the target, which of course was also complete bollocks if they had really been put in exactly the same situation.AthleticoSpizz wrote:It was not my job to "do the sums", it was TD's to make accurate comments
A large % would have, it was an awful finishRoyalBlue wrote:But he doesn't does he. He claimed Vydra missed his sitter today from 8 yards. Gooding then says it was at least as far out as the penalty spot and might have even been 14 yards. He also claimed that 10,000 of the crowd would have hit the target, which of course was also complete bollocks if they had really been put in exactly the same situation.AthleticoSpizz wrote:It was not my job to "do the sums", it was TD's to make accurate comments
Bob1871 wrote:A large % would have, it was an awful finishRoyalBlue wrote:But he doesn't does he. He claimed Vydra missed his sitter today from 8 yards. Gooding then says it was at least as far out as the penalty spot and might have even been 14 yards. He also claimed that 10,000 of the crowd would have hit the target, which of course was also complete bollocks if they had really been put in exactly the same situation.AthleticoSpizz wrote:It was not my job to "do the sums", it was TD's to make accurate comments
AthleticoSpizz wrote:It was not my job to "do the sums", it was TD's to make accurate comments
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests