It felt like it too. The place looked and felt pretty full. Queues for beers outside the SJM were crazy.
I'm struggling to find anyone insulting fellow Reading fans in the comments since the game.leon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 09:23 Well I hope you optimists are right and LR is the man to make this team play effective and interesting football that lasts all the way through the second half and injury time. This team needs surgery or at least some consistently fit players.
Cutting out the insulting your fellow RFC fans wouldn't go amiss however.
Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 07:35For the hard of thinking, constantly abusing Lane regardless of performance is not the same as critiquing an individual performance.traff wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 00:02“Funny how criticising Lane is suddenly a problem when I do it, but perfectly fine when the self appointed know all (who doesnt attend matches Snowflake does the exact same thing.”Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 21:37
You should probably work out how to quote if you're going to try to have a pop.
“And don’t worry about my quoting, worry about making a consistent point.”
[/quote
I guess it's not his fault he is awful, I’m struggling to think of many good performances, maybe a couple of moments. My frustraion is why he is put in the team ahead of others when he is so obviously ineffective. Which is easier to see in person than just on which bits the TV camera is pointed at. Looks like you and the manager have the same personality flaw:,you don’t learn from mistakes because you never think you make any.”
Apparently Lane was favoured over Young yesterday because of the amount of game time he's had (never going to change is it!) and LR wanted a 10 who could cut inside (in reality cuts inside, falls over and loses possession).traff wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 09:51Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 07:35For the hard of thinking, constantly abusing Lane regardless of performance is not the same as critiquing an individual performance.
[/quote
I guess it's not his fault he is awful, I’m struggling to think of many good performances, maybe a couple of moments. My frustraion is why he is put in the team ahead of others when he is so obviously ineffective. Which is easier to see in person than just on which bits the TV camera is pointed at. Looks like you and the manager have the same personality flaw:,you don’t learn from mistakes because you never think you make any.”
Ref initially didn't go to award anything until he heard the agonising scream and saw the player apparently dead on the floor (or did the AR influence him). His resurrection arrived a day late but was almost as impressive, given that he needed no treatment at all for the mortal injury incurred through zero contact!Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 21:45FK - Savage goes to hook a ball over his shoulder to clear, and player comes from his blindside to try to head. Savage gets the ball, then maybe a piece of face. It's a very generous FK imo.
Leam said Lane came on as, of the subs available, he’d offer more through the middle/inside.RoyalBlue wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 10:00Apparently Lane was favoured over Young yesterday because of the amount of game time he's had (never going to change is it!) and LR wanted a 10 who could cut inside (in reality cuts inside, falls over and loses possession).traff wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 09:51Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 07:35
For the hard of thinking, constantly abusing Lane regardless of performance is not the same as critiquing an individual performance.
[/quote
I guess it's not his fault he is awful, I’m struggling to think of many good performances, maybe a couple of moments. My frustraion is why he is put in the team ahead of others when he is so obviously ineffective. Which is easier to see in person than just on which bits the TV camera is pointed at. Looks like you and the manager have the same personality flaw:,you don’t learn from mistakes because you never think you make any.”
I've tried to hold off criticising Lane but he was completely ineffective yesterday and a waste of a substitution.
Can't disagree with all of that which was fairly obvious.Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 22:02 I find it amusing that people who have been chronically complaining about us being able to keep the ball and just hoofing it forward are now complaining that we kept the ball.
Considered review of the game...
We came up against by far the best team in the League, who are absolute masters of smash and grab. They are unbeaten since early December, have the lowest average possession in the League, and best defence in the League. And they showed us why. They were incredibly organised, worked exceptionally well and hard as a team, let us have the ball, and moved the ball forward extremely quickly and at pace.
No shit we struggled to pass incisively through them and create good chances. No one is giving them the credit they deserve for this.
We lost this game thanks to a dodgy early freekick and trying to throw the sink at a win late on. With a pretty poor defence. O'Connor is a bit hit and miss, Dorsett switches off a few times a game and Burns isn't very good. We were missing our two best defenders in Williams and Ward.
Moving forward, we lost Doyle early, who really is the creative spark in the middle (even when starting wide) as he finds space and can turn on a dime and tiptoe round challenges. Lane tried to do a lot of the right things, but his execution was poor. DK looked a threat when he could isolate his man, even against probably the best RB in the League. Kelvin had some good moments despite being sat on well by the best defence in the league. But Savage, Wing and Fraser don't have that creative spark that's needed to unlock a defence in depth. We missed out on a strong penalty shout as well.
There was some neat one and two touch football at times, some good sliding the ball forward into feet etc. Lincoln marshalled it very well. We went back and sideways a lot because Lincoln are so good at the marking, condensing the space and closing the passing lanes. We needed to shift it quicker and more precisely for it to be effective, but it's not like people were ignoring too many great passing options.
We really should have settled for the point in the last few minutes against the best team and defence in the League. Instead we went a bit crazy throwing bodies forward and oxf*rd it up.
Ultimately, we gave the best team a decent go, with (for most of the match) 5 first choice players out injured. Yeah, we're probably going to fall short. But that's been the case for the last two months. And we're still in the fight,
Bedwetters and hard of thinking are 2 that instantly come to mind.Armadillo Roadkill wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 09:28I'm struggling to find anyone insulting fellow Reading fans in the comments since the game.leon wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 09:23 Well I hope you optimists are right and LR is the man to make this team play effective and interesting football that lasts all the way through the second half and injury time. This team needs surgery or at least some consistently fit players.
Cutting out the insulting your fellow RFC fans wouldn't go amiss however.
Agreed there need to be significant changes to the team though, I just don't think we were are poor value entertainment against Lincoln as we have been on some occasions this year.
Someone threw a bottle(?) at one of their timewasting players by the touchline. I'm not sure of the time, but it might have been that.windermereROYAL wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 10:45 On a lighter note, while watching it on telly in the 54th minute I noticed a bit of a commotion in Y24, loads of yellow clad stewards in in the aisle not far from the front and it looked like around half a dozen or so people got ejected.
Lincoln fans in the home stand perhaps.
+1 Lincoln can play decent football but decided to, instead they stole ground at every opportunity for a closer long throw, feigned injury to win fouls, time wasted and the ref let them do it for free. There was an absolute comedy dive from their centre half and the ref gave the free kick. They were like the Arsenal of League 1 even down to the choreographed free kick routine.RoyalBlue wrote: ↑07 Apr 2026 10:10Ref initially didn't go to award anything until he heard the agonising scream and saw the player apparently dead on the floor (or did the AR influence him). His resurrection arrived a day late but was almost as impressive, given that he needed no treatment at all for the mortal injury incurred through zero contact!Snowflake Royal wrote: ↑06 Apr 2026 21:45FK - Savage goes to hook a ball over his shoulder to clear, and player comes from his blindside to try to head. Savage gets the ball, then maybe a piece of face. It's a very generous FK imo.
Ref had an absolute shocker including awarding the drop ball to Lincoln when he intercepted Lane's pass! Also failed to enforce the rule about leaving the pitch by the shortest route until the angry reaction from the East Stand left him with little option on the second occasion that it happened. Physios and player then took the piss in terms of the speed with which they left the pitch until the ref eventually had enough and issued a long overdue yellow.
In fairness to the officials, however, Lincoln are certainly up the top of the shithousery table.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 31 guests