Faithful Son wrote:If McClean feels so strongly about the British forces and our governments historic actions, why is he playing in this country? He seems happy enough to enjoy a very good wage and lifestyle in this country and whether he likes them or not, British soldiers have died/are dying so he is able to do so. Perhaps someone should remind him many Irishmen have also died defending these shores. Wearing a poppy one day of the year is the least he could (should) do to show a bit of respect and solidarity to the fans who ultimately pay his lavish wages. Players from other countries, including those from Argentina, have no such problems.
He's not a beast, he's just a fcuking gangster.No Fixed Abode wrote:I thought that Rakels was supposed to be a beast? Scrawny little tattooed bloke.
+1Hoop Blah wrote:However, it is frustrating to yet again see this group of players (and some new ones) put in another good shift in a cup game without being able to do the same in the league.
A lot of those soldiers might also say they were fighting so people in the future would have a right to choose how to express themselves whether it be by wearing a poppy or something else.Winston Smith wrote:Faithful Son wrote:If McClean feels so strongly about the British forces and our governments historic actions, why is he playing in this country? He seems happy enough to enjoy a very good wage and lifestyle in this country and whether he likes them or not, British soldiers have died/are dying so he is able to do so. Perhaps someone should remind him many Irishmen have also died defending these shores. Wearing a poppy one day of the year is the least he could (should) do to show a bit of respect and solidarity to the fans who ultimately pay his lavish wages. Players from other countries, including those from Argentina, have no such problems.
Not sure that is true having lost mates in Northern Ireland, but respect your view. So are we saying an Afghani Player could play and not have to wear the RFC badge because it has the Forbury Lion on it which commemorates the Battle of Maiwand fought against the Afghans? Surely this is football not politics so players should just wear the shirt, respect the beliefs of the Country they have chosen to play in and keep their political views to themselves?Norfolk Royal wrote:A lot of those soldiers might also say they were fighting so people in the future would have a right to choose how to express themselves whether it be by wearing a poppy or something else.Winston Smith wrote:Faithful Son wrote:If McClean feels so strongly about the British forces and our governments historic actions, why is he playing in this country? He seems happy enough to enjoy a very good wage and lifestyle in this country and whether he likes them or not, British soldiers have died/are dying so he is able to do so. Perhaps someone should remind him many Irishmen have also died defending these shores. Wearing a poppy one day of the year is the least he could (should) do to show a bit of respect and solidarity to the fans who ultimately pay his lavish wages. Players from other countries, including those from Argentina, have no such problems.
This sort of attitude really pishes me off.Faithful Son wrote:If McClean feels so strongly about the British forces and our governments historic actions, why is he playing in this country? He seems happy enough to enjoy a very good wage and lifestyle in this country and whether he likes them or not, British soldiers have died/are dying so he is able to do so. Perhaps someone should remind him many Irishmen have also died defending these shores. Wearing a poppy one day of the year is the least he could (should) do to show a bit of respect and solidarity to the fans who ultimately pay his lavish wages. Players from other countries, including those from Argentina, have no such problems.
I was livid, that during the game he fouled someone and then went over, offered his hand and picked them up....prick should have smacked him clean in the chopsPepe the Horseman wrote:He's not a beast, he's just a fcuking gangster.No Fixed Abode wrote:I thought that Rakels was supposed to be a beast? Scrawny little tattooed bloke.
No Fixed Abode wrote:I thought that Rakels was supposed to be a beast? Scrawny little tattooed bloke.
I respect your views. Some of us serve in the Army to protect this Country so you can have those views - so no problem with what you are saying - its my job to make that happen!!Jagermesiter1871 wrote:I struggle to respect anyone who chooses a career path in killing people. Subsequently I would never wear a poppy or want to be associated with it.
And that doesn't even take into consideration his background which completely explain why he wouldn't want to. Look into the troubles and you should figure it out.
In regards to Catterick royals point. Yeah you're right it is football not politics so why is a oxf*rd poppy on the shirt?
You bunch of oxf*rd sheep.
I get that now, but what about back in the day when the people they were killing were only Nazis?I struggle to respect anyone who chooses a career path in killing people
Hoop Blah wrote:I quite respect McLean for his reasons and principles to stand up for what he believes. His letter explaining his position explains it well.
I'd have a lot more respect if he wasn't so disrespectful at the same time. If he can't show a bit of respect for the national anthem because he hates all it stands for then he shouldn't be happy to work over here either.
Fans are well within their rights to give him abuse if he's going out of his way to be disrespectful to things they hold dear to them too. It's a double edged sword.
I'll nibble!Maneki Neko wrote: I get that now, but what about back in the day when the people they were killing were only Nazis?
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot] and 62 guests