We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.
We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.
Next season will be fun when we play them!windermereROYAL wrote:We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.
On the big screens they sporadically showed the heart rate of four fans (two from each side) called "Pulse of the Playoffs". The Huddersfield guy didn't drop below 140 I think peaking at about 160 at one point I think, whereas Reading Steve hardly moved from 70bpmwindermereROYAL wrote:Anyone care to explain who Danny and Steve are?RoyalBlue wrote:Unlike Danny from Huddersfield, Steve from Reading is clearly a very fit guy and, with a calm heart rate like that, should probably have taken one of our last two penalties!BraisingsteakRoyal wrote:
I was more concerned about Steve from Reading and his 70bpm when it was end-to-end. If i didn't know any better I'd have thought he'd lent his heart rate monitor to John Swift.
It won't be any different to normal. Just because a few Twitter users vent their spleen it doesn't mean the vast majority of fans will behave any differently to normal, ie middle class derby suits on.bobby1413 wrote:Next season will be fun when we play them!windermereROYAL wrote:We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.
Does anyone know who Reading Steve is? That Huddersfield fan however needs to see his doctor pronto.Brum Royal wrote:On the big screens they sporadically showed the heart rate of four fans (two from each side) called "Pulse of the Playoffs". The Huddersfield guy didn't drop below 140 I think peaking at about 160 at one point I think, whereas Reading Steve hardly moved from 70bpmwindermereROYAL wrote:Anyone care to explain who Danny and Steve are?RoyalBlue wrote:
Unlike Danny from Huddersfield, Steve from Reading is clearly a very fit guy and, with a calm heart rate like that, should probably have taken one of our last two penalties!
Reading Steve is a Cardio machine with a resting heart rate of 55bpm.Brum Royal wrote:On the big screens they sporadically showed the heart rate of four fans (two from each side) called "Pulse of the Playoffs". The Huddersfield guy didn't drop below 140 I think peaking at about 160 at one point I think, whereas Reading Steve hardly moved from 70bpmwindermereROYAL wrote:Anyone care to explain who Danny and Steve are?RoyalBlue wrote:
Unlike Danny from Huddersfield, Steve from Reading is clearly a very fit guy and, with a calm heart rate like that, should probably have taken one of our last two penalties!
Indeed. It could be farcical. It also falls into the lazy trap of equating a shot on target with a better chance than once that went wide. Think of Huddersfield's best chances yesterday - all of them missed the target.Davezk wrote:Teams would be shooting from ridiculous positions to boost the shot count e.g. the halfway line
I wouldn't have gone, but now I fancy getting in the Fulham pubs really early, and saying things like both our goals in the play offs shouldn't have stood, they were much the better team and deserved to be in the final, and that they would have spanked Huddersfield. Should work a treat!bobby1413 wrote:Next season will be fun when we play them!windermereROYAL wrote:We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.
From our vantage point Hudders tactics were so obvious. When in possession they moved to 3 upfront. One central. The other two hugging the touchlines in line with the back 3. In effect Blackett and Gunter were ahead of them by 10 yards or so. The Udders full backs then pushed up. Resulting in a doubling up or a player in space. sAlso resulted in Reading having no forward momentum as their full backs were quicker if they lost possession. So effectively simple. Wagner won that particularly tactical battle.BR2 wrote: Having him there should have meant the wing-backs could safely bomb forward but they didn't.
Might be a bit revisionist but I don't recall Twitter being as bad for opposition fan goading than it has been over the last couple of seasons.windermereROYAL wrote:We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.
That's because Twitter is full of fcuking twats, football fans are gargantuan bellends.genome wrote:Might be a bit revisionist but I don't recall Twitter being as bad for opposition fan goading than it has been over the last couple of seasons.windermereROYAL wrote:We all knew we would get it from them if we lost. no big surprise.genome wrote:I think I might quit Twitter.
Invaded by Fulham fans yesterday, giving it the big one. Baffling.