It is a great penalty technique tbf. Like it alot.Oilroyal wrote:Fair, and kind of agree Maffff.
Just watched the highlights. Taylor’s penalty technique sickened the life out of every Royal in the stadium. Painful to watch live and painful to watch back.
Pen looked to me like Moore did his usual get himself in trouble and beaten, then desperately try to get in the way and bring his man down by falling into him hoping he wins a foul. Pretty much exactly the same as when that Wednesday winger rinsed him for their first goal.maffff wrote:I'm not going to panic after that, it's one of those days. Looked like two decent teams, both pretty cohesive in the first half but individual talent made us look more likely to breakthrough - we had, if I recall all right, 3 chances we could and on another day would have scored from.
Second half they started brightly but weren't really making huge strides and both teams were in it. Rafael had a tame Leko shot covered until the deflection made it go out of reach. After that their heads went up and we turned sloppy, particularly in midfield. Still didn't look out of it until the penalty which was arguable as I'm pretty sure it was a foul on Moore. After that, aside from one chance for a consolation at the very end it was game over.
Can't argue about the score, they looked a good team. Great set of fans too. Loud.
We'll play worse than that and win.
Penalty oddity?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:First half we were the better team.
Second half lucky goal then a Reading melt down.
Gomes goes nuts with subs and total and utter meltdown. Why change shape when we were looking dangerous?
Puscas should have scored 2. One on one and last shot of the game. Joao shocked me. Some good work but some laziness.
Moore shocking game.
Rafael good except for penalty oddity.
An important learning point for Reading. Need a plan B that doesn't involve just going f**king mental.
Need Miazga back.
Need Moore to stop having off days.
His mind games before the kick was takenJagermesiter1871 wrote:Penalty oddity?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:First half we were the better team.
Second half lucky goal then a Reading melt down.
Gomes goes nuts with subs and total and utter meltdown. Why change shape when we were looking dangerous?
Puscas should have scored 2. One on one and last shot of the game. Joao shocked me. Some good work but some laziness.
Moore shocking game.
Rafael good except for penalty oddity.
An important learning point for Reading. Need a plan B that doesn't involve just going f**king mental.
Need Miazga back.
Need Moore to stop having off days.
When it works, it works. When it doesn't he looks stupid. He'll probably end up with a higher save ratio than many.Zip wrote:His mind games before the kick was takenJagermesiter1871 wrote:Penalty oddity?2 world wars, 1 world cup wrote:First half we were the better team.
Second half lucky goal then a Reading melt down.
Gomes goes nuts with subs and total and utter meltdown. Why change shape when we were looking dangerous?
Puscas should have scored 2. One on one and last shot of the game. Joao shocked me. Some good work but some laziness.
Moore shocking game.
Rafael good except for penalty oddity.
An important learning point for Reading. Need a plan B that doesn't involve just going f**king mental.
Need Miazga back.
Need Moore to stop having off days.
Yep.maffff wrote:When it works, it works. When it doesn't he looks stupid. He'll probably end up with a higher save ratio than many.Zip wrote:His mind games before the kick was takenJagermesiter1871 wrote:
Penalty oddity?
I must have somehow missed what he did - what was it?Zip wrote:Yep.maffff wrote:When it works, it works. When it doesn't he looks stupid. He'll probably end up with a higher save ratio than many.Zip wrote:
His mind games before the kick was taken
I was in the ED Stand so at the opposite end. Rafael decided to stand very much on the left of the goal just before Taylor took the penJagermesiter1871 wrote:I must have somehow missed what he did - what was it?Zip wrote:Yep.maffff wrote:
When it works, it works. When it doesn't he looks stupid. He'll probably end up with a higher save ratio than many.
I think part of the problem was Taylor was so casual Cabral didn't really know when to switch from the mind games to saving.Zip wrote:Yep.maffff wrote:When it works, it works. When it doesn't he looks stupid. He'll probably end up with a higher save ratio than many.Zip wrote:
His mind games before the kick was taken
Never understood why this isn't done and never heard any good reasons why not. It would be a blindingly obvious improvement which let's the crowd know what's going on and reduces the regular frustration heard every gameSnowball wrote:Works in rugby.tmesis wrote:I'd like to see the clock in the hands of an independent official who isn't having to deal with all the other crap going on. I'd also like that person signal the end of the game when the game ends, rather than waiting for the ball to go into a neutral "non-controversial" position on the pitch before blowing, which is what all refs seem to do.Zip wrote: I would much prefer to see the clock stopped when a goal is scored, sub made, treatment for a player or when a free kick is awarded. It works well in rugby. The number of minutes injury time seems so variable these days.
The problem with stopping the clock at every stoppage is that the game would take far too long. the ball is apparently dead for about half an hour in each match.
It'd also do nothing to stop players going down with fake injuries to disrupt the flow of the game.
Shorten the official time.
Stop the clock for throw-ins, free-kicks until the whistle is blown
Stop the clock for Injuries
Enforce the goal-keeper time-allowed with ball. A few 18 yard free-kicks and time-wasting would stop
Then at official HT and FT a hooter goes. The game continues
until the ball goes out of play, unless there's a penalty.
It also removes the awkward, "When do I blow for time?" for the ref.bcubed wrote:Never understood why this isn't done and never heard any good reasons why not. It would be a blindingly obvious improvement which let's the crowd know what's going on and reduces the regular frustration heard every gameSnowball wrote:Works in rugby.tmesis wrote: I'd like to see the clock in the hands of an independent official who isn't having to deal with all the other crap going on. I'd also like that person signal the end of the game when the game ends, rather than waiting for the ball to go into a neutral "non-controversial" position on the pitch before blowing, which is what all refs seem to do.
The problem with stopping the clock at every stoppage is that the game would take far too long. the ball is apparently dead for about half an hour in each match.
It'd also do nothing to stop players going down with fake injuries to disrupt the flow of the game.
Shorten the official time.
Stop the clock for throw-ins, free-kicks until the whistle is blown
Stop the clock for Injuries
Enforce the goal-keeper time-allowed with ball. A few 18 yard free-kicks and time-wasting would stop
Then at official HT and FT a hooter goes. The game continues
until the ball goes out of play, unless there's a penalty.
- Where did that come from? Or only 2 minutes?! Etc.
Just a sensible and simple idea and a good way to improve communication with the crowd.
Me too. Most casual pen I have ever seen.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think part of the problem was Taylor was so casual Cabral didn't really know when to switch from the mind games to saving.Zip wrote:Yep.maffff wrote:
When it works, it works. When it doesn't he looks stupid. He'll probably end up with a higher save ratio than many.
I though he was walking up to reposition the ball at first!
Same as John Akinde. Cant ever remember him missing on either.Zip wrote:Me too. Most casual pen I have ever seen.Snowflake Royal wrote:I think part of the problem was Taylor was so casual Cabral didn't really know when to switch from the mind games to saving.Zip wrote:
Yep.
I though he was walking up to reposition the ball at first!
Maneki Neko wrote:Snowflake Royal wrote:Really? Barely heard a peep from them until their goal. After that, yeah pretty class. But easy when you're winning.windermereROYAL wrote: And the Charlton fans were different gravy, hardly heard a peep from 1871.
Yeah that.
Bemused by the comments about their fans tbh.
Hardly made a sound till they scored.
At least from my seat
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Royals and Racers and 60 guests