Gunter looks tired to me, maybe he needs a break or is not 100% fit.3points wrote:Gunter was terrible last night. I thought he'd been a bit better recently but he was truly awful yesterday. Just let his man run past him so many times, including the first goal.
Beerens is clearly a Stam favourite. Will he ever be dropped or subbed? The new Jobi McAnuff?
And why bring on Gravenberch to play centre forward rather than try Samuel for the last 5 minutes? Very strange.
Isn't that the exact same problem we've had under all our recent managers that have wanted to play possession football out from the back. It means a total lack of urgency when chasing a game and usually going out with a whimper. All too familiar since we dropped back downIan Royal wrote:I get the feeling we're really hard to beat, and usually win, if we take the lead... but really really struggle if we go behind. Because of our obvious lack of goals and slightly ponderous and uncertain build up..
I think the problems have been quite different and the different managers have had different approaches. It's not like there's only one type of possession football.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Isn't that the exact same problem we've had under all our recent managers that have wanted to play possession football out from the back. It means a total lack of urgency when chasing a game and usually going out with a whimper. All too familiar since we dropped back downIan Royal wrote:I get the feeling we're really hard to beat, and usually win, if we take the lead... but really really struggle if we go behind. Because of our obvious lack of goals and slightly ponderous and uncertain build up..
The problem so far is that we don't play from the back we play at the back.Ian Royal wrote:...to give us the opportunity to play from the back....
Actually thought Stam had cracked that as after the usual drab, dull, insipid, going nowhere first half the players came out with much more drive and enthusiasm and purpose and more than matched Villa and should have won but for the usual lack of a goalscorer and lack of substitutions to replace obviously tired looking players.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:Isn't that the exact same problem we've had under all our recent managers that have wanted to play possession football out from the back. It means a total lack of urgency when chasing a game and usually going out with a whimper. All too familiar since we dropped back downIan Royal wrote:I get the feeling we're really hard to beat, and usually win, if we take the lead... but really really struggle if we go behind. Because of our obvious lack of goals and slightly ponderous and uncertain build up..
Sometimes we do, and sometimes we don't. Part of the problem is that in order to create space it requires very patient passing to create the space. If any of those passes are risky, the crowd gets restless, and sometimes that makes the players panicky, and they boot it forward when there's no space to pass it into. Or it's not risky at all, but it is boring, and the crowd gets restless, with similar results. So it fails. And other times, the final pass forward into space goes awry. Because, you know, we have a back 4 that is worth, tops £3 million. Not £30 million. And of course you have the problem that the midfield isn't very good always at finding that space. Especially Danny Williams (hey, if you can have Gunter as a permanent scapegoat, I can have Danny. )ladida_gunner_graham wrote:The problem so far is that we don't play from the back we play at the back.Ian Royal wrote:...to give us the opportunity to play from the back....
ladida_gunner_graham wrote:The problem so far is that we don't play from the back we play at the back.Ian Royal wrote:...to give us the opportunity to play from the back....
fine margins.Norfolk Royal wrote:Chris Gunter in giving his assessment of the Villa game on the OS: '“Sometimes results can affect people’s thinking of how it went'
That is true Chris.
Read more at http://www.readingfc.co.uk/news/article ... hVwtdHV.99
Far from the case. To be fair, it's never likely to be even, but gut feel can be very misleading. Follow this link and click on the Heat Map. For those who can't be arsed to look, for a home team looking to win, it's heavily skewed in our own half, with huge hotspots at right back, left back and goalkeeper. Evans had the most touches, mostly in our half. Al Habsi had more touches than Beerens, Williams and Kermorgant.Maneki Neko wrote:ladida_gunner_graham wrote:The problem so far is that we don't play from the back we play at the back.Ian Royal wrote:...to give us the opportunity to play from the back....![]()
pretty much spread between the thirds on Tuesday. imo
hasn't it always been so?Maneki Neko wrote:fine margins.Norfolk Royal wrote:Chris Gunter in giving his assessment of the Villa game on the OS: '“Sometimes results can affect people’s thinking of how it went'
That is true Chris.
Read more at http://www.readingfc.co.uk/news/article ... hVwtdHV.99
hes correct, and its an important point.
we were very close to getting the draw, everyone would have thought, meh, ok, itll do
chalk off the shit rebound/O.G shenanigans in the first half and we could have won it and everyone would have been pretty happy with things. lose to two spawny goals and its frustration and moaning all round.
when in reality the actual performance would be the same in all three scenarios.
fans are too keen to equate shit results with shit performance, imo
Very telling, a great resource. Shows how unthreatening and insipid we currently are.ladida_gunner_graham wrote:Far from the case. To be fair, it's never likely to be even, but gut feel can be very misleading. Follow this link and click on the Heat Map. For those who can't be arsed to look, for a home team looking to win, it's heavily skewed in our own half, with huge hotspots at right back, left back and goalkeeper. Evans had the most touches, mostly in our half. Al Habsi had more touches than Beerens, Williams and Kermorgant.Maneki Neko wrote:ladida_gunner_graham wrote: The problem so far is that we don't play from the back we play at the back.![]()
pretty much spread between the thirds on Tuesday. imo
https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/10850 ... ston-Villa
Don't get it. If you uncheck Gunter there's still a large red at RB. If you recheck Gunter and uncheck Moore, the red goes completely - so what happened to Gunters heat map?biff wrote:Very telling, a great resource. Shows how unthreatening and insipid we currently are.ladida_gunner_graham wrote:Far from the case. To be fair, it's never likely to be even, but gut feel can be very misleading. Follow this link and click on the Heat Map. For those who can't be arsed to look, for a home team looking to win, it's heavily skewed in our own half, with huge hotspots at right back, left back and goalkeeper. Evans had the most touches, mostly in our half. Al Habsi had more touches than Beerens, Williams and Kermorgant.Maneki Neko wrote:
![]()
pretty much spread between the thirds on Tuesday. imo
https://www.whoscored.com/Matches/10850 ... ston-Villa
Wow. That is indescribably harsh. Beerens definitely takes people on and puts crosses in. Brooker was a useless yellow streak of piss who cowered by the halfway line doing nothing most of every match.72 bus wrote:The more I see of Beerens the more he reminds me of Paul Brooker
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Horsham Royal, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 92 guests