I agreeSnowflake Royal wrote:People need to get a grip on reality. We've signed two strikers and brought a third back from loan. We're not bringing in another. We clearly can't afford the millions it would cost to get a player of the calibre we want; and even then it'd be a gamble as to whether they would succeed.
Baldock has played less than a game and a half for us, and had little pre-season with us plus he didn't play much last year. He's going to take a little while to get up to speed.
McNulty has had a pre-season and played last year, but he hasn't played a lot with Bod or Baldock and he's making a big step up. He's also had less than half a game.
Meite is raw and making a decent step up. He's not played much with Bod or Baldock. He's played on the wing and a cameo upfront.
Bod has had very little pre-season and has a 1 in 2 strike rate so far.
Can we not give the team and these players at least five or six games to establish some form before we start writing them off?
Given the amount two of them have played at this level - meaning they're basically untried, and the fact one of them won promotion with Brighton, that's exactly what it is.sandman wrote:It's not writing these players off to see that none of them are strikers a club at this level should have as first choice. They're all good second or third choice strikers that would supplement a squad but none of them are going to get the goals you need to get anywhere but mid table, if you're lucky.
Would question why we're signing players like Mcnulty that "need to make a big step up" when we have our own in house strikers that need to do the same and wouldn't cost us over a million pounds.
As seems to be the norm in today’s world of debate, if someone disagrees with someone’s opinion, their alternative view is manipulated into a negative and anti whatever stance.Snowflake Royal wrote:People need to get a grip on reality.
Can we not give the team and these players at least five or six games to establish some form before we start writing them off?
Except there literally are calls for a third striker to be loaned in and the new signings dismissed as not up to standard right here.Pandoras Box wrote:As seems to be the norm in today’s world of debate, if someone disagrees with someone’s opinion, their alternative view is manipulated into a negative and anti whatever stance.Snowflake Royal wrote:People need to get a grip on reality.
Can we not give the team and these players at least five or six games to establish some form before we start writing them off?
No one is writing off any players and no one has said that. Fact.
Bod may have scored a goal in two matches, but there were chances yesterday that he didn’t connect with that a natural poacher type striker may have. Fact
He worked hard and created a couple of chances off his own back but he’s never going to set the world alight, that’s all.
To falsely claim that a valid opinion of someone who witnessed the game yesterday as writing them off is rather unfair.
No one is looking for him to be benched or got rid of and I also don’t believe Baldock or McNulty got the opportunity to show their skills through the service that was offered.
That doesn’t immediately mean we need new strikers and to put everyone on the transfer list.
You say "may have". That also means "may not have", so you are in effect saying a natural poacher type striker may have missed the same chances that Bod missed. THAT is a fact.Pandoras Box wrote:As seems to be the norm in today’s world of debate, if someone disagrees with someone’s opinion, their alternative view is manipulated into a negative and anti whatever stance.Snowflake Royal wrote:People need to get a grip on reality.
Can we not give the team and these players at least five or six games to establish some form before we start writing them off?
No one is writing off any players and no one has said that. Fact.
Bod may have scored a goal in two matches, but there were chances yesterday that he didn’t connect with that a natural poacher type striker may have. Fact
He worked hard and created a couple of chances off his own back but he’s never going to set the world alight, that’s all.
To falsely claim that a valid opinion of someone who witnessed the game yesterday as writing them off is rather unfair.
No one is looking for him to be benched or got rid of and I also don’t believe Baldock or McNulty got the opportunity to show their skills through the service that was offered.
That doesn’t immediately mean we need new strikers and to put everyone on the transfer list.
MUST win game for Clementbobby1413 wrote:We'll know a lot more after the Bolton game. A game we should go into and grip up, get the chances and take them.
If we don't then it seems that not a lot has changed. If we go in and pass the ball around aimlessly until about 25 minutes in when Bolton realise we haven't got any striking power or intentions, they end up nicking the ball and scoring.
Totally agree if we lose that we are down to our last 43 games to ensure survival.BR0B0T wrote:MUST win game for Clementbobby1413 wrote:We'll know a lot more after the Bolton game. A game we should go into and grip up, get the chances and take them.
If we don't then it seems that not a lot has changed. If we go in and pass the ball around aimlessly until about 25 minutes in when Bolton realise we haven't got any striking power or intentions, they end up nicking the ball and scoring.
exactly!windermereROYAL wrote:Totally agree if we lose that we are down to our last 43 games to ensure survival.BR0B0T wrote:MUST win game for Clementbobby1413 wrote:We'll know a lot more after the Bolton game. A game we should go into and grip up, get the chances and take them.
If we don't then it seems that not a lot has changed. If we go in and pass the ball around aimlessly until about 25 minutes in when Bolton realise we haven't got any striking power or intentions, they end up nicking the ball and scoring.
Hard to see us getting 45 points from those last 44 games to stay up.BR0B0T wrote:exactly!windermereROYAL wrote:Totally agree if we lose that we are down to our last 43 games to ensure survival.BR0B0T wrote:
MUST win game for Clement
windermereROYAL wrote:Totally agree if we lose that we are down to our last 43 games to ensure survival.BR0B0T wrote:MUST win game for Clementbobby1413 wrote:We'll know a lot more after the Bolton game. A game we should go into and grip up, get the chances and take them.
If we don't then it seems that not a lot has changed. If we go in and pass the ball around aimlessly until about 25 minutes in when Bolton realise we haven't got any striking power or intentions, they end up nicking the ball and scoring.
Oh Hound.Hound wrote:Not really. Half the sides in the division are very average or worse. We just have to be a bit better than them
I doubt too many were predicting a play-off pushSutekh wrote: anyone who was expecting anything more than mid table at best with this current rebuild is deluded.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], From Despair To Where?, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 168 guests