This type of negativity isn’t helpingSnowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
You're really hurt that your unhelpful trolling got called out aren't you. Grow up a bit SDR.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:This type of negativity isn’t helpingSnowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
New regime needed first to stabilise the club otherwise the only managers the club will get are yet more of the same failures "before they even start" that they've been employing for much of the last 6 years.Stranded wrote:I think we all know he is going to get sacked at some point because the vast majority of managers do - I think the only differing view on that will be the timelines to when that sacking will be.Millsy wrote:Not enough games played to judge the lad fairly, even if some of us think we know where this is going to end up.
On that basis and nothing else, Selles IN.
Who is actually playing out of position? Binden - yes but we know nothing of him, he could have spent his entire youth career at RB.Snowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
The big issue is the formation. Playing one CB at RB is hardly a team out of position.Hound wrote:Who is actually playing out of position? Binden - yes but we know nothing of him, he could have spent his entire youth career at RB.Snowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
It’s hardly unheard of to play a CB at RB. Holmes is a great example of someone who did the job well there. Who else?
And you suggested Rushesha at LB which to me seems as ridiculous as anything Selles has considered
Rushesha spent his youth days at RB, or so we've been told. Not all RBs can play LB, but an energetic player like Rushesha who has moved into DM should be able to. My first choice is obviously NGW, second the injured McIntyre.Hound wrote:Who is actually playing out of position? Binden - yes but we know nothing of him, he could have spent his entire youth career at RB.Snowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
It’s hardly unheard of to play a CB at RB. Holmes is a great example of someone who did the job well there. Who else?
And you suggested Rushesha at LB which to me seems as ridiculous as anything Selles has considered
I’m not hurt nor was I trollingSnowflake Royal wrote:You're really hurt that your unhelpful trolling got called out aren't you. Grow up a bit SDR.SouthDownsRoyal wrote:This type of negativity isn’t helpingSnowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
The goal keeping howlers were also a distraction from the failures that led to them.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The big issue is the formation. Playing one CB at RB is hardly a team out of position.Hound wrote:Who is actually playing out of position? Binden - yes but we know nothing of him, he could have spent his entire youth career at RB.Snowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
It’s hardly unheard of to play a CB at RB. Holmes is a great example of someone who did the job well there. Who else?
And you suggested Rushesha at LB which to me seems as ridiculous as anything Selles has considered
I get there could be an alternative narrative that yesterday we had a few chances and conceded due to a poor GK display from Button who has largely been a good signing. I don't buy it. They overran us for the 1st half as we have seen in several away games and it could have been more. We made chances when chasing the game; how about setting up so we don't have to chase the game?
Moments go for and against us away from home - see the Abbey penalty appeal at 1-0 which went our way. We remember the moments that go against us as "key", with the implication being that we just need to start winning those key moments. That's not true.
5-3-2 seems like a good fit for this team. Allows Binden and McIntyre to play out from CB, makes space for Elliott in the middle where he can have more impact and provides support for Carson/NGW in their defensive duties where they both struggle. It seems like a clear answer to me, at least away from home. Can Selles learn?
Yeah I think 5-3-2 is a good system for us, mainly because we have a good selection of CB's to pick from and it can make us far more sturdy in the middle of the park, but it's how we play. We play very open, so we are always going to be easier to breakthrough based on that and teams can overload the middle of the pitch.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The big issue is the formation. Playing one CB at RB is hardly a team out of position.Hound wrote:Who is actually playing out of position? Binden - yes but we know nothing of him, he could have spent his entire youth career at RB.Snowflake Royal wrote:Dear Reuben. You're in League One. Things are going shit. You have a very inexperienced squad.
It might help a teensy bit, if you asked your players to play in the positions where they have the most experience. And play a really simple percentages based formation and tactics, minimising risk, and maximising reward.
Rather than the screaming clusterfuck of omnishambles bullshit you are currently serving up.
It’s hardly unheard of to play a CB at RB. Holmes is a great example of someone who did the job well there. Who else?
And you suggested Rushesha at LB which to me seems as ridiculous as anything Selles has considered
I get there could be an alternative narrative that yesterday we had a few chances and conceded due to a poor GK display from Button who has largely been a good signing. I don't buy it. They overran us for the 1st half as we have seen in several away games and it could have been more. We made chances when chasing the game; how about setting up so we don't have to chase the game?
Moments go for and against us away from home - see the Abbey penalty appeal at 1-0 which went our way. We remember the moments that go against us as "key", with the implication being that we just need to start winning those key moments. That's not true.
5-3-2 seems like a good fit for this team. Allows Binden and McIntyre to play out from CB, makes space for Elliott in the middle where he can have more impact and provides support for Carson/NGW in their defensive duties where they both struggle. It seems like a clear answer to me, at least away from home. Can Selles learn?
Goal 2 was the result of an exceptionally poor cross into the box (Azeez?), which failed to beat the first man and left our defence over committed in attack.Snowflake Royal wrote:The goal keeping howlers were also a distraction from the failures that led to them.WestYorksRoyal wrote:The big issue is the formation. Playing one CB at RB is hardly a team out of position.Hound wrote:
Who is actually playing out of position? Binden - yes but we know nothing of him, he could have spent his entire youth career at RB.
It’s hardly unheard of to play a CB at RB. Holmes is a great example of someone who did the job well there. Who else?
And you suggested Rushesha at LB which to me seems as ridiculous as anything Selles has considered
I get there could be an alternative narrative that yesterday we had a few chances and conceded due to a poor GK display from Button who has largely been a good signing. I don't buy it. They overran us for the 1st half as we have seen in several away games and it could have been more. We made chances when chasing the game; how about setting up so we don't have to chase the game?
Moments go for and against us away from home - see the Abbey penalty appeal at 1-0 which went our way. We remember the moments that go against us as "key", with the implication being that we just need to start winning those key moments. That's not true.
5-3-2 seems like a good fit for this team. Allows Binden and McIntyre to play out from CB, makes space for Elliott in the middle where he can have more impact and provides support for Carson/NGW in their defensive duties where they both struggle. It seems like a clear answer to me, at least away from home. Can Selles learn?
Goal 1.
Turnover, Bindon is high up the pitch and can't recover, Dean is too slow to get out to cover, so stays in no mans land, no one has tracked the runner inside, Dean goes to him late and gets beaten.
Goal 2
Carson comfortably gets to the ball, then dithers on it scared of holding off his man. Gets bullied off it and it's havok.
We're getting crucified at fullback continuously because Selles picks the wrong players, isolates them and pushes them too high to provide the width his attackers could give if he didn't want them all playing in each others pocket within a 20 yard box.
Agreed!SouthDownsRoyal wrote:Two nil up away from home, heading for an away win
SELLES IN