He's got it completely wrong. His approach is wrong. But you're completely right he's had 3 games and we shouldn't be making any rush judgements for another 7 or 8.CountryRoyal wrote:It goes without saying that no rational thinking would be anything other than Selles in but he must burden some of the blame today.
Lol.St Pauli wrote:There is no point in criticising the management.
Only a public online witch hunt of those players responsible will turn things around. Feel free to add names below.
J’accuse! J’accuse! Traitre!
Think Twitter is the place for that and there is plenty of it going on!Pepe the Horseman wrote:Lol.St Pauli wrote:There is no point in criticising the management.
Only a public online witch hunt of those players responsible will turn things around. Feel free to add names below.
J’accuse! J’accuse! Traitre!
oxf*rd offSouthDownsRoyal wrote:We need less negativity on here
SELLES IN
You can’t say that m15Loafer wrote:oxf*rd offSouthDownsRoyal wrote:We need less negativity on here
SELLES IN
selles OUT!
I think people tend to overlook how erratic the form of younger players can be.WestYorksRoyal wrote: We have a talented squad that should be doing better
Maybe the opposition intensity is a bit lower in cup games, even if Millwall had a strong XI. Perhaps it is us struggling under extra pressure and expectation in the league, especially away (our home record is 6th in the table so no issues there). Perhaps they feel the weight of our dire away record, even if most of it came under a different team. Let's not forget the weight of the off field situation, uncertainty about being paid, losing points and no guarantee of away day accommodation, which will get to you more in the pressure of the league. So I would say it's mainly psychological.ROKERITE wrote:Not having seen Reading play this season your results seem bizarre. Winning 0-4 at Millwall and 0-9 at Exeter but dropping so many points elsewhere. Is Mr Selles tinkering too much or is there another explanation?
The squad are talented but they are also incredibly inexperienced, and whilst I am excited by what this squad could do, if they get the proper opportunity, it is also fair to say the make-up of the squad would have been quite different if we weren't in the position we find ourselves with regards to ownership.WestYorksRoyal wrote:People seem to be focusing in on his tactical failings, of which there have been several, but not giving credit for his squad development.
We have a talented squad that should be doing better, but he has played a big part in creating this. Camara, Ehibhatiomhan and Azeez were on the fringes last year so were likely in line to play a role in L1. But so many managers would not have given opportunities to Vickers, Carson, Abbey, Binden, Rushesa and Craig. And now one of the reasons people say we should be doing better is because of the talent we have in Vickers, Abbey and Binden among others.
It's so easy to imagine a manager like Wilder or Wellens sticking with the likes of Holmes and Carroll.
So by showcasing the talent in the squad and our ability to scout and develop youngsters, which off the pitch will be a massive selling point to investors, he has bought himself a hell of a lot of time.
I think we all know he is going to get sacked at some point because the vast majority of managers do - I think the only differing view on that will be the timelines to when that sacking will be.Millsy wrote:Not enough games played to judge the lad fairly, even if some of us think we know where this is going to end up.
On that basis and nothing else, Selles IN.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 267 guests