When and why did this start?Sutekh wrote:Players lying down behind a wall at a free kick
IFAB’s ******* stupid & unnecessary fiddling about with the laws of the game that mean defenders now hold their hand behind their backs when defending in the penalty area
I reckon I've a post from at least five years ago making this point.Sanguine wrote:I mean, generally speaking, you don't score a goal without an assist.
Data is in fact critical to modern day football and, fitness aside (which is itself supported by analytics), represents the biggest change in the sport since the 'old days' of the 20th Century.
I shared this anecdote before, a small part of what has made Rodri the player that he is - brother in law close to Etihad and had a chat with City's Sporting Director. A couple of years ago analysts found that it took Rodri around half a second longer to move the ball right to left across the pitch as it did left to right - combination of lesser first touch with his weaker foot, and less efficient weight transfer. He got an injury, and during his lay-off of a few months, the club put together a specific training plan to address this, technique, certain exercises etc, and improved that timing gap. There's little doubt that Rodri has been the best midfielder in the world in the last two years.
You might/probably think this is data-driven bullshit, but it speaks of the margins at which elite players operate, the tiny gains that can make a difference at the top level.
The amount of stat presented to fans is just an off-shoot of the availability of more analytics. Maybe it could be better targeted, but it does mean something. No stats are truly subjective.
Is that a reminder to Salford’s manager about remembering to play their star defender?genome wrote:Field Tilt is my new favourite one
Didn't he play a few games under Stam?genome wrote:Field Tilt is my new favourite one
I'd have sympathy for this view. If it wasn’t for the fact that ref's not only allowed it to become the state of affairs by not using the powers available to them to stamp it out at birth, but actively encouraged much of it by getting rattled and being influenced in their decision making for being berated, and almost never giving a freekick or penalty for fouling unless a player goes to ground, even if they're very clearly being impeded.katweslowski wrote:I struggle to agree with this based on the following:Sutekh wrote:standard of refs in the U.K.
- The ref is a single person, in the middle of a pitch. Surrounded by 22 top athletes and players, all berating him
- There are 10,000 up to 75,000 (PL) in the ground all berating the ref
- There are two managers, plus about 10 others at the sidelines shouting at the ref and berating him
- After the game, the media spend 3-4 days playing the single split second decision over and over, often with pundits all torn on the right answer.
- All the players, spend the game often:
Cheating
Trying to deceive the ref
Elaborating just how bad a tackle was
Feigning injury
Lying about something, such as when a ball CLEARLY touches them and they go nuts as if it's their ball
Abusing the ref
...
Not for a second saying the refs are good (or bad), just saying that I think they should be given a bit of a free pass, until the players all stop cheating every single fecking minute of the game.
“Carra” file under “Trent” as the fcuking annoying English Liverpool obsession.Sanguine wrote:Tbf to the media, the obviously silly/complex stuff doesn't really translate doesn't last long - see the brief obsession with 'scans', and Carra presenting stills of midfielders 'scanning' over their shoulder, as if footballers looking around the pitch was some kind of new science.
Okay.leon wrote:“Carra” file under “Trent” as the fcuking annoying English Liverpool obsession.Sanguine wrote:Tbf to the media, the obviously silly/complex stuff doesn't really translate doesn't last long - see the brief obsession with 'scans', and Carra presenting stills of midfielders 'scanning' over their shoulder, as if footballers looking around the pitch was some kind of new science.
Thieving fcuks.
There is one great example of how that matters.Sanguine wrote:Tbf to the media, the obviously silly/complex stuff doesn't really translate doesn't last long - see the brief obsession with 'scans', and Carra presenting stills of midfielders 'scanning' over their shoulder, as if footballers looking around the pitch was some kind of new science.

I've posted before, but there is a real recency bias in this supposed stat. I think the number of different sides promoted to the PL in the last 10-15 years is more than 20. Essentially that in that time around half of our 92 PL and EFL clubs have played in the top division.URZZZZ wrote:Same teams just alternate between the top end of the Championship and then a relegation fight in the Prem. Burnley, Leeds, Sheffield United, West Brom etc etc. Leicester, Ipswich and Southampton (the three promoted sides last season) likely to be the same three teams that subsequently get relegated this season.
Leeds, Leicester, Southampton also arguably big teams that have been down, rather than small teams on the up.Sanguine wrote:I've posted before, but there is a real recency bias in this supposed stat. I think the number of different sides promoted to the PL in the last 10-15 years is more than 20. Essentially that in that time around half of our 92 PL and EFL clubs have played in the top division.URZZZZ wrote:Same teams just alternate between the top end of the Championship and then a relegation fight in the Prem. Burnley, Leeds, Sheffield United, West Brom etc etc. Leicester, Ipswich and Southampton (the three promoted sides last season) likely to be the same three teams that subsequently get relegated this season.
You've also got a current PL mid-table table full of teams promoted in recent seasons and that have established themselves in the league - Fulham, Brentford, Bournemouth, Brighton and Forest.
I think more the reality - whilst not denying the financial leg up 'yoyo-ing' gives you - is that so many teams have had a shot at the big time that they all look like big sides now.
Nah, come on. You've got more than 40 teams in a relatively short time period playing in the Premier League, and you've got a host of established and current mid-table clubs that have been promoted in recent seasons. It's no argument at all to just say 'well, they will go down in the end eventually'.Dirk Gently wrote:Yes, but it is precisely that - "a shot at the big time."
It's almost like the Premier League having one place spare just to show the little clubs what it's like for a year or maybe two - "Your turn to come and be our whipping boy for a season."
They're not taken seriously and everyone knows they're not competitive and it'll only be a fleeting visit.
Obvious exceptions apply, but you have to think that the likes of Brighton, Brentford, Bournemouth and Forest will fizzle out in a number of years, and then the fall will be financially damaging. qv Wigan & Bolton who were once pretty established PL clubs.
Thankfully this is not something that troubles Reading.Winston Biscuit wrote:how every PL club (and some lower) seems to now have some kind of unofficial voice of the fan type person, who runs a club youtube channel and is just the loudest person among their fans. From what I have seen they are almost always youngsters with armfuls of stats, pretty terrible opinions on the game, and a very high opinion of themselves. and they always have stupid names too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests