by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 12:13
30 Jan 2025 12:13Ince made the mistake of relying on bargain basement shite, rather than bringing through our youth.Hound wrote:Ah see Virginia now. He wasn’t Bowen though was he? Gomes I thought
I do think where Bowen had some involvement the signings were better. Tbf under Ince we were massively restricted so whilst people like Hendrick were poor, we really were shopping on bargain basement territory
Yes true. Though possibly slightly different conversation esp re: StamSnowflake Royal wrote:Ince made the mistake of relying on bargain basement shite, rather than bringing through our youth.Hound wrote:Ah see Virginia now. He wasn’t Bowen though was he? Gomes I thought
I do think where Bowen had some involvement the signings were better. Tbf under Ince we were massively restricted so whilst people like Hendrick were poor, we really were shopping on bargain basement territory
Stam bought expensive shite and mediocrity and let go one of our golden youth generations.
Thank oxf*rd for the FL's transfer restrictions or we'd probably have never seen Olise, Azeez, Ehibhatiomhan, Craig, Abbey, Dorsett, Garcia, Southwood, Abrefa, Bindon, Vickers and co.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 12:58
30 Jan 2025 12:58It's pretty telling that basically not a single one of our managers has gone on to better things since Rodgers, with the possible future exception of Selles - too early to tell right now.Hound wrote:Yes true. Though possibly slightly different conversation esp re: StamSnowflake Royal wrote:Ince made the mistake of relying on bargain basement shite, rather than bringing through our youth.Hound wrote:Ah see Virginia now. He wasn’t Bowen though was he? Gomes I thought
I do think where Bowen had some involvement the signings were better. Tbf under Ince we were massively restricted so whilst people like Hendrick were poor, we really were shopping on bargain basement territory
Stam bought expensive shite and mediocrity and let go one of our golden youth generations.
Thank oxf*rd for the FL's transfer restrictions or we'd probably have never seen Olise, Azeez, Ehibhatiomhan, Craig, Abbey, Dorsett, Garcia, Southwood, Abrefa, Bindon, Vickers and co.
Weird thing is I remember us being really short of depth under Stam season 1 and yet the clown had let some quality players leave. Very odd really
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 13:58
30 Jan 2025 13:58Don't really consider the Scots Prem with Kilmarnock a step up from mid Championship.rabidbee wrote:Steve Clark set a club points record and qualified for Europe with Kilmarnock, then took Scotland to their first international tournament in 23 years (and again last year).
by Greatwesternline » 30 Jan 2025 14:56
30 Jan 2025 14:56And yet, we were 3-1 up in a penalty shoot out.Hound wrote:Think Stam might well be looked at the most damaging manager in our history tbh
I do tend to lean this way, think Stam's football was much more suited to Premier League football.Greatwesternline wrote:And yet, we were 3-1 up in a penalty shoot out.Hound wrote:Think Stam might well be looked at the most damaging manager in our history tbh
Genuinely think if we got scored 2 more pens, armed with a very famous manager and an owner with money to burn, we would have become quite a decent outfit that next season.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 15:01
30 Jan 2025 15:01We'd have been utterly dreadful. We did well because we bored teams into mistakes and controlled possession, which wouldn't have even remotely worked in the PL.Greatwesternline wrote:And yet, we were 3-1 up in a penalty shoot out.Hound wrote:Think Stam might well be looked at the most damaging manager in our history tbh
Genuinely think if we got scored 2 more pens, armed with a very famous manager and an owner with money to burn, we would have become quite a decent outfit that next season.
by Greatwesternline » 30 Jan 2025 15:19
30 Jan 2025 15:19I have this nagging suspicion that in the Premier League his name would have opened up a really exciting range of exciting prospects keen to play under one of the best defenders of all time.Snowflake Royal wrote:We'd have been utterly dreadful. We did well because we bored teams into mistakes and controlled possession, which wouldn't have even remotely worked in the PL.Greatwesternline wrote:And yet, we were 3-1 up in a penalty shoot out.Hound wrote:Think Stam might well be looked at the most damaging manager in our history tbh
Genuinely think if we got scored 2 more pens, armed with a very famous manager and an owner with money to burn, we would have become quite a decent outfit that next season.
We'd have needed virtually an entirely new squad and just spent tens of millions on shit.
by Mid Sussex Royal » 30 Jan 2025 15:52
30 Jan 2025 15:52What he has done with Scotland is though. This isn't the Scotland of the 80's and 90's full of the likes of Hansen & Dalgleish and co. 2 qualifications with an overall very modest pool of players ability wise is very decent. He's still largely relying on Lindon Dykes up front who is a L1 squad player.Snowflake Royal wrote:Don't really consider the Scots Prem with Kilmarnock a step up from mid Championship.rabidbee wrote:Steve Clark set a club points record and qualified for Europe with Kilmarnock, then took Scotland to their first international tournament in 23 years (and again last year).
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 15:53
30 Jan 2025 15:53International Intersmaschional.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:What he has done with Scotland is though. This isn't the Scotland of the 80's and 90's full of the likes of Hansen & Dalgleish and co. 2 qualifications with an overall very modest pool of players ability wise is very decent. He's still largely relying on Lindon Dykes up front who is a L1 squad player.Snowflake Royal wrote:Don't really consider the Scots Prem with Kilmarnock a step up from mid Championship.rabidbee wrote:Steve Clark set a club points record and qualified for Europe with Kilmarnock, then took Scotland to their first international tournament in 23 years (and again last year).
Did the PL get to approving Dai as Reading owner though? If we'd had have gone up would he have been told to sell - or the club refused promotion?Snowflake Royal wrote:We'd have been utterly dreadful. We did well because we bored teams into mistakes and controlled possession, which wouldn't have even remotely worked in the PL.Greatwesternline wrote:And yet, we were 3-1 up in a penalty shoot out.Hound wrote:Think Stam might well be looked at the most damaging manager in our history tbh
Genuinely think if we got scored 2 more pens, armed with a very famous manager and an owner with money to burn, we would have become quite a decent outfit that next season.
We'd have needed virtually an entirely new squad and just spent tens of millions on shit.
by Greatwesternline » 30 Jan 2025 17:25
30 Jan 2025 17:25Media says it was Dai's business partner for Everton buy out who got vetoed, not Dai, which is why Dai sans said partner got approved for RFC.Sutekh wrote:Did the PL get to approving Dai as Reading owner though? If we'd had have gone up would he have been told to sell - or the club refused promotion?Snowflake Royal wrote:We'd have been utterly dreadful. We did well because we bored teams into mistakes and controlled possession, which wouldn't have even remotely worked in the PL.Greatwesternline wrote:
And yet, we were 3-1 up in a penalty shoot out.
Genuinely think if we got scored 2 more pens, armed with a very famous manager and an owner with money to burn, we would have become quite a decent outfit that next season.
We'd have needed virtually an entirely new squad and just spent tens of millions on shit.
by Snowflake Royal » 30 Jan 2025 22:42
30 Jan 2025 22:42It was Hull, not Everton and as per usual with the parasite, he was lying.Greatwesternline wrote:Media says it was Dai's business partner for Everton buy out who got vetoed, not Dai, which is why Dai sans said partner got approved for RFC.Sutekh wrote:Did the PL get to approving Dai as Reading owner though? If we'd had have gone up would he have been told to sell - or the club refused promotion?Snowflake Royal wrote: We'd have been utterly dreadful. We did well because we bored teams into mistakes and controlled possession, which wouldn't have even remotely worked in the PL.
We'd have needed virtually an entirely new squad and just spent tens of millions on shit.
He tried to pass the blame on to a "consortium member" when it was actually him.SKY wrote:An attempt by Dai Yongge and Hawken Xiu Li, his sister, to buy Hull involved the use of a third party, who insisted that he controlled the relevant funds necessary to undertake the deal.
It subsequently transpired that the finances were actually under the control of Mr Dai, with the Financial Times reporting last month that a Premier League investigation into him had raised several "red flags" over his commercial background.
This. I see nothing to suggest he would have succeeded at that level; we defied gravity that season and would have been found out in the PL. Plus Dai's recruitment would have been shit, pretty sure you'd have still seen Tevreden out and Gourlay in.Hound wrote:We won’t but considering the quality of his signings the next season, I’m pretty sure they’d have been crap in the Prem as well. We’d have needed an entire new team - who’d have been able to step up? Swift, Moore, Illori and Williams at an absolute push. Possibly nobody.
And that style of football got utterly found out in season 2, as it would in the Prem
And Stams subsequent management career suggests it’s been an absolute horror show as well.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Gunny Fishcake, Larry_Parnell, Polonia and 23 guests