It's harsh to wish a club go under but if Portsmouth survive then it spits in the face of all clubs who have played the game honestly over the past few years and resisted the temptation to spend beyond their means.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 30 Jan 2012 14:56
30 Jan 2012 14:56No power at all SC. Which kind of sums the whole thing up. Supporters seem to think they have a right to say how the club should be run. They dont. There is barely a club that exists for the benefit of its "members" any more. Football Clubs as they were designed to be died a long long time ago.Svlad Cjelli wrote:Sadly, most supporters don't think about the due diligence and the bona fides of owners until *after* it's all gone horribly wrong.
But what power did they have to do anything about how their club was being run and who owned it - apart from to walk away?
Occupy Lancaster Gate!Tony Le Mesmer wrote:We could all stay away if we aren't happy in some form of strike, but fans cant bring themselves round to the idea. Not for 2 decades probably. Football has now changed so much it would take some kind of nationwide coordination amongst fans to make themslevs heard. Personally, i dont think the average fan really loves their club as much as they think. They are more than happy to turn up, watch the game and go home to Sky Sports like a bunch of robots. If they really cared, they would do a hell of a lot more to show it. But they dont.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 30 Jan 2012 15:11
30 Jan 2012 15:11I get the tube to lancaster Gate daily. Might stage a 1 man sit in!Uke wrote:Occupy Lancaster Gate!Tony Le Mesmer wrote:We could all stay away if we aren't happy in some form of strike, but fans cant bring themselves round to the idea. Not for 2 decades probably. Football has now changed so much it would take some kind of nationwide coordination amongst fans to make themslevs heard. Personally, i dont think the average fan really loves their club as much as they think. They are more than happy to turn up, watch the game and go home to Sky Sports like a bunch of robots. If they really cared, they would do a hell of a lot more to show it. But they dont.
They could move there from St Pauls
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2012 15:12
30 Jan 2012 15:12Wow! Occupy an office that the FA moved from ten years ago! Now that's what I call anarchy! Tat'll teach 'em!!!Uke wrote:Occupy Lancaster Gate!Tony Le Mesmer wrote:We could all stay away if we aren't happy in some form of strike, but fans cant bring themselves round to the idea. Not for 2 decades probably. Football has now changed so much it would take some kind of nationwide coordination amongst fans to make themslevs heard. Personally, i dont think the average fan really loves their club as much as they think. They are more than happy to turn up, watch the game and go home to Sky Sports like a bunch of robots. If they really cared, they would do a hell of a lot more to show it. But they dont.
They could move there from St Pauls
To Soho Square in 2002, to Wembley in 2009.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Didn't the FA move from Lancaster Gate a while ago?
Svlad Cjelli wrote:To Soho Square in 2002, to Wembley in 2009.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Didn't the FA move from Lancaster Gate a while ago?
How were football clubs designed to be? You do know there was never a glorious age of fans and board running their local team as one giant co-operative don't you?Tony Le Mesmer wrote: Football Clubs as they were designed to be died a long long time ago.
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Jan 2012 15:15
30 Jan 2012 15:15Mind you occupying Wembley would get a much higher profile in the media....Uke wrote:Svlad Cjelli wrote:To Soho Square in 2002, to Wembley in 2009.Barry the bird boggler wrote:Didn't the FA move from Lancaster Gate a while ago?
Of the three Lancaster Gate would be nicer to occupy though
But outside Wembley? It's not exactly St Pauls is it?Barry the bird boggler wrote:Mind you occupying Wembley would get a much higher profile in the media....
'greed. There's not even a Starbucks within 100 yards.Uke wrote:But outside Wembley? It's not exactly St Pauls is it?Barry the bird boggler wrote:Mind you occupying Wembley would get a much higher profile in the media....
Not in this country, no. But in others, like Germany, that's exactly how it works.Silver Fox wrote:How were football clubs designed to be? You do know there was never a glorious age of fans and board running their local team as one giant co-operative don't you?Tony Le Mesmer wrote: Football Clubs as they were designed to be died a long long time ago.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 30 Jan 2012 15:38
30 Jan 2012 15:38They were designed to be like any other Club. A group of people organised for a common purpose. Professional Football 'clubs' today are anything but that.Silver Fox wrote:How were football clubs designed to be? You do know there was never a glorious age of fans and board running their local team as one giant co-operative don't you?Tony Le Mesmer wrote: Football Clubs as they were designed to be died a long long time ago.
Depends.Tony Le Mesmer wrote:They were designed to be like any other Club. A group of people organised for a common purpose. Professional Football 'clubs' today are anything but that.Silver Fox wrote:How were football clubs designed to be? You do know there was never a glorious age of fans and board running their local team as one giant co-operative don't you?Tony Le Mesmer wrote: Football Clubs as they were designed to be died a long long time ago.
Irony as to which club managed to break the Rule 34 given the major Footy related news story........Svlad Cjelli wrote: Depends.
The Northern, professional, clubs were set up as businesses - except that the FA's Rule 34 meant no money could be taken out. The Southern, amateur, clubs were set up as proper members' clubs.
Well, quite!Mr Angry wrote:Irony as to which club managed to break the Rule 34 given the major Footy related news story........Svlad Cjelli wrote: Depends.
The Northern, professional, clubs were set up as businesses - except that the FA's Rule 34 meant no money could be taken out. The Southern, amateur, clubs were set up as proper members' clubs.
"If you can imagine it, there is porn of it?"Svlad Cjelli wrote:The Northern, professional, clubs were set up as businesses - except that the FA's Rule 34 meant no money could be taken out. The Southern, amateur, clubs were set up as proper members' clubs.
by Friday's Legacy » 30 Jan 2012 17:41
30 Jan 2012 17:41Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests