Sandman in supporting the simpleton kick and rush approach shocker.Pepe the Horseman wrote:sandman wrote:Yeah what idiots for actually wanting to see us go for the jugular and try and score a few more goals.
Who wants to see an exciting young French player, who apparently had the opposition full back all at sea, run with the ball?
There was me thinking football was about scoring goals but apparently it's all about boosting you possession statistics by passing it along your back four.When there's no options on it's clearly better to pass backwards or sideways and keep the ball, than pump it up to no one for the sake of going forwards.
And Meite was shot after a couple of really good runs, give the kid a fcuking chance to catch his breath instead of screaming at him.
Not what I'm saying at all. As I've said on this thread and in the post below, I like passing football. I just don't care for square passes across your own box for the sake of it.Ian Royal wrote:Sandman in supporting the simpleton kick and rush approach shocker.Pepe the Horseman wrote:sandman wrote:Yeah what idiots for actually wanting to see us go for the jugular and try and score a few more goals.
Who wants to see an exciting young French player, who apparently had the opposition full back all at sea, run with the ball?
There was me thinking football was about scoring goals but apparently it's all about boosting you possession statistics by passing it along your back four.When there's no options on it's clearly better to pass backwards or sideways and keep the ball, than pump it up to no one for the sake of going forwards.
And Meite was shot after a couple of really good runs, give the kid a fcuking chance to catch his breath instead of screaming at him.
But I'm not talking about when there is no other option, I'm talking about when there is a forward pass on and they turn back inside rather than playing it forward. Play your football in the opposition half rather than your own. Then if you make a mistake your less likely to concede from it. Surely that makes sense?Pepe the Horseman wrote:sandman wrote:Yeah what idiots for actually wanting to see us go for the jugular and try and score a few more goals.
Who wants to see an exciting young French player, who apparently had the opposition full back all at sea, run with the ball?
There was me thinking football was about scoring goals but apparently it's all about boosting you possession statistics by passing it along your back four.When there's no options on it's clearly better to pass backwards or sideways and keep the ball, than pump it up to no one for the sake of going forwards.
And Meite was shot after a couple of really good runs, give the kid a fcuking chance to catch his breath instead of screaming at him.
Well you happen to be wrong. I was sure Cooper would get a right pasting on here as for some reason he seems to be the latest hate figure for no good reason at all IMO. And so I specifically watched him first half as I was sitting near the front of East Stand in the Reading defensive half and so he was playing right in front of me a lot of the time. And he did make 4 very poor passes but on numerous occasions he found his man. I am pretty sure he had more touches than any other RFC player in the first half - although even with my maths skills I could not tally them for every player. But typically the haters here only see the odd poor passes and not all the good things he did.LWJ wrote:you obviously didn't count, why make that up?andrew1957 wrote:
As for Cooper he saw a huge amount of the ball in the first half and I actually counted his poor passes and I made it 4 out of about 30
+1winchester_royal wrote:I keep hearing 'Norwood who?' or 'Oliver Norwood who?' and it's starting to irritate me. Not because I disagree with the sentiment, but because the execution is totally off.
The whole point of the diss is that his departure is so irrelevant that you've forgotten his name - therefore it should be 'Oliver who?'.
Please can you all correct this going forward.
Ta.
I was though. I'm not even arguing with you, you tried to pick a fight then got defensive when you got called up on it.sandman wrote:But I'm not talking about when there is no other option, I'm talking about when there is a forward pass on and they turn back inside rather than playing it forward. Play your football in the opposition half rather than your own. Then if you make a mistake your less likely to concede from it. Surely that makes sense?Pepe the Horseman wrote:sandman wrote:Yeah what idiots for actually wanting to see us go for the jugular and try and score a few more goals.
Who wants to see an exciting young French player, who apparently had the opposition full back all at sea, run with the ball?
There was me thinking football was about scoring goals but apparently it's all about boosting you possession statistics by passing it along your back four.When there's no options on it's clearly better to pass backwards or sideways and keep the ball, than pump it up to no one for the sake of going forwards.
And Meite was shot after a couple of really good runs, give the kid a fcuking chance to catch his breath instead of screaming at him.
sandman wrote:Not what I'm saying at all. As I've said on this thread and in the post below, I like passing football. I just don't care for square passes across your own box for the sake of it.Ian Royal wrote:Sandman in supporting the simpleton kick and rush approach shocker.Pepe the Horseman wrote:When there's no options on it's clearly better to pass backwards or sideways and keep the ball, than pump it up to no one for the sake of going forwards.
And Meite was shot after a couple of really good runs, give the kid a fcuking chance to catch his breath instead of screaming at him.
On the option a) approach I have often thought the same about long goalie kick outs. It often doesn't lead to anything but a ping pong battle and a disruption of tempo.RoyalBlue wrote:sandman wrote:Not what I'm saying at all. As I've said on this thread and in the post below, I like passing football. I just don't care for square passes across your own box for the sake of it.Ian Royal wrote: Sandman in supporting the simpleton kick and rush approach shocker.
For the 'sake of it' might be for sake of the fact that there isn't another safe passing opportunity open at that time. So do you a) Hoof the ball forward and hope that one of your players wins possession (they often don't). or b) Play safe, pass the ball square/back as much as you need to until you open up the opportunity for another relatively safe pass forward?
Too often in the recent past our management and players have opted for a)
Thank God we are now changing that approach.
Obviously Plymouths tactic was to let the Reading centre backs have the ball. Hence why Stam wants to play with cultured defenders. That are comfortable pushing forward. Evans can then step back to fill the void left.andrew1957 wrote:I am pretty sure he had more touches than any other RFC player in the first half
Not sure of your point...andrew1957 wrote:Well you happen to be wrong. I was sure Cooper would get a right pasting on here as for some reason he seems to be the latest hate figure for no good reason at all IMO. And so I specifically watched him first half as I was sitting near the front of East Stand in the Reading defensive half and so he was playing right in front of me a lot of the time. And he did make 4 very poor passes but on numerous occasions he found his man. I am pretty sure he had more touches than any other RFC player in the first half - although even with my maths skills I could not tally them for every player. But typically the haters here only see the odd poor passes and not all the good things he did.LWJ wrote:you obviously didn't count, why make that up?andrew1957 wrote:
As for Cooper he saw a huge amount of the ball in the first half and I actually counted his poor passes and I made it 4 out of about 30
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Royals and Racers, Semrush [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 89 guests