Yes it was and had Kenny not handled we would probably have scored.blade 1 wrote:Tis in the past and it doesn't matter much really, but was it not 1-1 at that point?
It's still irrelevant and I have no idea why I'm arguing about it.
Yes it was and had Kenny not handled we would probably have scored.blade 1 wrote:Tis in the past and it doesn't matter much really, but was it not 1-1 at that point?
that was never a pen, see we over here admit those sort of thingsblade 1 wrote:i will not get you started on weather coney was in a goal scoring position when kenny was harshly ajudged to have brought him down in the last minuet
You'd have missed it anyway.blade 1 wrote:conveniently forgetting harpers rugby tackle? most blatent penalty ever.
Kenny should have been off at Bramall Lane, too. Mind you, a 9-year-old ball boy would have saved Kitson's penalty, so I doubt it would have changed the result...SpaceCruiser wrote:I disagree. 3 points or 4 at a push for your team. Kenny is a cheat and should have been sent off at our place, therefore we deserved the three points and you would have been lucky to get a point.blade 1 wrote:it could have easily been 6 points for either side.
that was never a pen, see we over here admit those sort of things
Oh well, I just disagreed... From where I was sat (row D, behind the goal) Kenny grabbed Convey's leg to pull him down, preventing what would have been an easy tap-in. Although that would not have been a fair result.Alan Partridge wrote:that was never a pen, see we over here admit those sort of thingsblade 1 wrote:i will not get you started on weather coney was in a goal scoring position when kenny was harshly ajudged to have brought him down in the last minuet
If that had been given against us would you be saying the same thing? Was never a pen.rabidbee wrote:Oh well, I just disagreed... From where I was sat (row D, behind the goal) Kenny grabbed Convey's leg to pull him down, preventing what would have been an easy tap-in. Although that would not have been a fair result.Alan Partridge wrote:that was never a pen, see we over here admit those sort of thingsblade 1 wrote:i will not get you started on weather coney was in a goal scoring position when kenny was harshly ajudged to have brought him down in the last minuet
Yep - thats what I saw too.rabidbee wrote:Oh well, I just disagreed... From where I was sat (row D, behind the goal) Kenny grabbed Convey's leg to pull him down, preventing what would have been an easy tap-in. Although that would not have been a fair result.Alan Partridge wrote:that was never a pen, see we over here admit those sort of thingsblade 1 wrote:i will not get you started on weather coney was in a goal scoring position when kenny was harshly ajudged to have brought him down in the last minuet
But that doesn't really express that he got as many wrong as he got right. Which isn't actually very good...BBC Sport wrote:Last time Lawro got FIVE results right and ONE perfect score.
Well, yes. I don't how pulling down a player who has run past you, and has an open net to aim for, is not preventing a goal-scoring opportunity, frankly.Alan Partridge wrote:If that had been given against us would you be saying the same thing? Was never a pen.rabidbee wrote:Oh well, I just disagreed... From where I was sat (row D, behind the goal) Kenny grabbed Convey's leg to pull him down, preventing what would have been an easy tap-in. Although that would not have been a fair result.Alan Partridge wrote: that was never a pen, see we over here admit those sort of things
Not at all.Alan Partridge wrote:Reading Tinted Glasses lads
Wow, some sense. A number of posters here think that anyone who dares to predict Reading will lose, or may struggle, is a cock. The job of Lawrenson, like any other pundit, is to have a general knowledge about football. He doesn't have the time to research every single thing about Reading - he doesn't claim to be a Reading expert. His prediction is not an unreasonable one; I haven't looked at the bookies' odds but suspect that Blades have shorter odds than Reading. A number of people have said that they'd be happy with a point.cmonurz wrote:Why the criticism of someone because he predicts a Reading loss?
Oh really, that should excuse him for his lack of knowledge. Surely it would not take him much time to find out how previous games have gone - i.e. loading up soccerbase, selecting head-to-head, selecting Sheff Utd and then Reading and bingo, the entire history of matches played between them. If he had checked that, then maybe he could make a better informed opinion on the possible score. To a lot of us, it seems like he looks at the fixture and thinks "hmmmm, Sheff Utd at home to Reading.....looks like a home win there...." and then move on without another thought.Boston Royal wrote:Wow, some sense. A number of posters here think that anyone who dares to predict Reading will lose, or may struggle, is a cock. The job of Lawrenson, like any other pundit, is to have a general knowledge about football. He doesn't have the time to research every single thing about Reading - he doesn't claim to be a Reading expert. His prediction is not an unreasonable one; I haven't looked at the bookies' odds but suspect that Blades have shorter odds than Reading. A number of people have said that they'd be happy with a point.cmonurz wrote:Why the criticism of someone because he predicts a Reading loss?
We are one of the relegation favourites, even though it's September and we've started well. If you offered a number of fans 17th place at the end of the season, many of us would take it. The bookies probably still predict that we're one of the teams likely to go down; if you don't agree, good for you, the bookies' odds will seem favorable and you can make money.
Don't get me wrong, Lawro is smug, annoying, conceited etc., but it seems that no-one can predict a Reading loss without being flamed.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 288 guests