I think Savage offers more going forward and his range of passing and eye for a spectacular goal is pretty good and i firmly believe he will get better with a run of games.Snowflake Royal wrote:So, rumour is that Savage had a payrise clause in his contract triggered on 15 starts, and we couldn't afford it so stopped starting him.
Which would mean Craig was only brought in for Savage by Selles for contractual, not tactical reasons.
And now Savage has reportedly waived his payrise to play, he's immediately back to starting and Craig has been dropped.
Despite Craig's record in the run without Savage being P10, W4, D4, L2.
So is Craig now relegated to the bench despite playing a pretty big part in turning us round, and Selles just never really fancied him that much?
He's really good at screening the defence for someone his age, he's always popping up in just the right place to deal with danger.Crowbar6753 wrote:I think Savage offers more going forward and his range of passing and eye for a spectacular goal is pretty good and i firmly believe he will get better with a run of games.Snowflake Royal wrote:So, rumour is that Savage had a payrise clause in his contract triggered on 15 starts, and we couldn't afford it so stopped starting him.
Which would mean Craig was only brought in for Savage by Selles for contractual, not tactical reasons.
And now Savage has reportedly waived his payrise to play, he's immediately back to starting and Craig has been dropped.
Despite Craig's record in the run without Savage being P10, W4, D4, L2.
So is Craig now relegated to the bench despite playing a pretty big part in turning us round, and Selles just never really fancied him that much?
However, there is something about Craig!! he is so calm and assured for his age and really does look a class act at times in the middle of the park. Let's face it, the upturn in our results was right around when he started his run in the team.
This is a really difficult decision to make by Selles and having that midfield dynamo is paramount to us surviving the drop.
If it were me i would stick with Craig as i truly believe if we have a future he is the type of player to build it around.
Think he also looked a bit tired recently, so having Savage as an option to start again is a bonus. With the volume of games this month, both will get plenty of minutes (if fit).Hound wrote:Big fan of Craig, guess Selles felt slightly obliged to play Savage again after the wage thing
Tbf don’t think our results have been much worse since Savage began starting again. And Craig still getting plenty off the bench
4 in the league. Not sure when the cut off for 5 being a ban is but probably not too far off.Hendo wrote:Agree that it is probably wise swapping them around a little bit.
Also, how many yellow cards is Craig on? Feel like it is quite a few.
Ah it's only the first 19 games, so gone a while ago.Stranded wrote:4 in the league. Not sure when the cut off for 5 being a ban is but probably not too far off.Hendo wrote:Agree that it is probably wise swapping them around a little bit.
Also, how many yellow cards is Craig on? Feel like it is quite a few.
Yes, he's exactly like Parky, apart from playing and looking absolutely nothing like him.Millsy wrote:Craig reminds me of a young Parky, sort of.
Ok but other than that...Snowflake Royal wrote:Yes, he's exactly like Parky, apart from playing and looking absolutely nothing like him.Millsy wrote:Craig reminds me of a young Parky, sort of.
Well past the "5 is a ban" rule now. Next "target" to avoid will be 10 yellows which must not be reached before around the 38 game mark as I recall.Stranded wrote:4 in the league. Not sure when the cut off for 5 being a ban is but probably not too far off.Hendo wrote:Agree that it is probably wise swapping them around a little bit.
Also, how many yellow cards is Craig on? Feel like it is quite a few.
It's certainly nice to not let them have bragging rights and say even at our worst and your best in 20 odd years you still can't beat us.St Pauli wrote:Have to say for me the biggest priority this season (even more important than survival in league 1) was not losing to Oxford.
Selles succeeds again.
I'm positive that was down to the awful conditions. But that was the right call once you got past the 80th minute and it became backs to the wall.St Pauli wrote:No weird substitutions in the closing stages- more success from Selles!
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Doc, Google [Bot] and 294 guests