I’ll throw a suggestion out that maybe some of our ‘best’ players from last year or 2 weren’t actually that special and good coaching and tactics made them look goodWestYorksRoyal wrote:I just think of course our players aren't as good as Bindon, Mbengue, Knibbs, Smith and Azeez, who are all playing at a higher level for a reason.
But do they match them for potential compared to 2 years ago? Obvious example - Lane is a similar age to Knibbs when we signed him, and already has a L1 season under his belt with double figures goals and assists. We should be able to help him develop like we did Knibbs. Kyerewaa is raw, quick without composure and end product but works hard, like Azeez was. Burns has come out of the City academy, looks decent on the ball and has >50 EFL appearances under his belt. He potentially has a higher ceiling than O'Connor and Williams and is definitely ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago, but looks like a liability in this team. O'Mahony had a promising loan at Portsmouth in the Championship and has dominated the PL U21s league; we held off a lot of competition to sign him. But he looks lost.
But we say the squad isn't as good as last year and experienced players are injured. Well I'm calling bullshit. It's the nature of L1 to lose your best players, and the coaching staff's job is to develop new ones, which we're failing miserably in. Clubs like Wimbledon, Bradford and Stevenage don't have as squads as good as ours on paper, but they are better teams due to better coaching.
How can you say Burns is ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago?WestYorksRoyal wrote:I just think of course our players aren't as good as Bindon, Mbengue, Knibbs, Smith and Azeez, who are all playing at a higher level for a reason.
But do they match them for potential compared to 2 years ago? Obvious example - Lane is a similar age to Knibbs when we signed him, and already has a L1 season under his belt with double figures goals and assists. We should be able to help him develop like we did Knibbs. Kyerewaa is raw, quick without composure and end product but works hard, like Azeez was. Burns has come out of the City academy, looks decent on the ball and has >50 EFL appearances under his belt. He potentially has a higher ceiling than O'Connor and Williams and is definitely ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago, but looks like a liability in this team. O'Mahony had a promising loan at Portsmouth in the Championship and has dominated the PL U21s league; we held off a lot of competition to sign him. But he looks lost.
But we say the squad isn't as good as last year and experienced players are injured. Well I'm calling bullshit. It's the nature of L1 to lose your best players, and the coaching staff's job is to develop new ones, which we're failing miserably in. Clubs like Wimbledon, Bradford and Stevenage don't have as squads as good as ours on paper, but they are better teams due to better coaching.
He was out of position at RB and looked unconvincing. Even at CB, he got dominated by Rhodes at Blackpool and had a costly poor game at home to Barnsley. He learned quickly and it became clear pretty quickly he was destined for a higher level. But there were bumps in the road.MR. CYNICAL wrote:How can you say Burns is ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago?WestYorksRoyal wrote:I just think of course our players aren't as good as Bindon, Mbengue, Knibbs, Smith and Azeez, who are all playing at a higher level for a reason.
But do they match them for potential compared to 2 years ago? Obvious example - Lane is a similar age to Knibbs when we signed him, and already has a L1 season under his belt with double figures goals and assists. We should be able to help him develop like we did Knibbs. Kyerewaa is raw, quick without composure and end product but works hard, like Azeez was. Burns has come out of the City academy, looks decent on the ball and has >50 EFL appearances under his belt. He potentially has a higher ceiling than O'Connor and Williams and is definitely ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago, but looks like a liability in this team. O'Mahony had a promising loan at Portsmouth in the Championship and has dominated the PL U21s league; we held off a lot of competition to sign him. But he looks lost.
But we say the squad isn't as good as last year and experienced players are injured. Well I'm calling bullshit. It's the nature of L1 to lose your best players, and the coaching staff's job is to develop new ones, which we're failing miserably in. Clubs like Wimbledon, Bradford and Stevenage don't have as squads as good as ours on paper, but they are better teams due to better coaching.
You say he looks a liability in the team, Bindon was never that and looked class from day one.
Maybe so, he started at centre back but for some reason Selles decided to play him at right back for a few games where admittedly he looked uncomfortable, but I'd prefer him to Burns any day.WestYorksRoyal wrote:He was out of position at RB and looked unconvincing. Even at CB, he got dominated by Rhodes at Blackpool and had a costly poor game at home to Barnsley. He learned quickly and it became clear pretty quickly he was destined for a higher level. But there were bumps in the road.MR. CYNICAL wrote:How can you say Burns is ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago?WestYorksRoyal wrote:I just think of course our players aren't as good as Bindon, Mbengue, Knibbs, Smith and Azeez, who are all playing at a higher level for a reason.
But do they match them for potential compared to 2 years ago? Obvious example - Lane is a similar age to Knibbs when we signed him, and already has a L1 season under his belt with double figures goals and assists. We should be able to help him develop like we did Knibbs. Kyerewaa is raw, quick without composure and end product but works hard, like Azeez was. Burns has come out of the City academy, looks decent on the ball and has >50 EFL appearances under his belt. He potentially has a higher ceiling than O'Connor and Williams and is definitely ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago, but looks like a liability in this team. O'Mahony had a promising loan at Portsmouth in the Championship and has dominated the PL U21s league; we held off a lot of competition to sign him. But he looks lost.
But we say the squad isn't as good as last year and experienced players are injured. Well I'm calling bullshit. It's the nature of L1 to lose your best players, and the coaching staff's job is to develop new ones, which we're failing miserably in. Clubs like Wimbledon, Bradford and Stevenage don't have as squads as good as ours on paper, but they are better teams due to better coaching.
You say he looks a liability in the team, Bindon was never that and looked class from day one.
Of course I'd prefer the Bindon who left us this summer to Burns; I'd prefer him to any of our CBs and indeed any CB in L1. But it wasn't always obvious he was at that level - I'm not convinced he was this time 2 years ago. Abbey was higher rated by a lot of fans initially.MR. CYNICAL wrote:Maybe so, he started at centre back but for some reason Selles decided to play him at right back for a few games where admittedly he looked uncomfortable, but I'd prefer him to Burns any day.WestYorksRoyal wrote:He was out of position at RB and looked unconvincing. Even at CB, he got dominated by Rhodes at Blackpool and had a costly poor game at home to Barnsley. He learned quickly and it became clear pretty quickly he was destined for a higher level. But there were bumps in the road.MR. CYNICAL wrote: How can you say Burns is ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago?
You say he looks a liability in the team, Bindon was never that and looked class from day one.
To be fair, I'd forgotten about AbbeyWestYorksRoyal wrote:Of course I'd prefer the Bindon who left us this summer to Burns; I'd prefer him to any of our CBs and indeed any CB in L1. But it wasn't always obvious he was at that level - I'm not convinced he was this time 2 years ago. Abbey was higher rated by a lot of fans initially.MR. CYNICAL wrote:Maybe so, he started at centre back but for some reason Selles decided to play him at right back for a few games where admittedly he looked uncomfortable, but I'd prefer him to Burns any day.WestYorksRoyal wrote: He was out of position at RB and looked unconvincing. Even at CB, he got dominated by Rhodes at Blackpool and had a costly poor game at home to Barnsley. He learned quickly and it became clear pretty quickly he was destined for a higher level. But there were bumps in the road.
Bindon was 18 two years ago, Burns is 22 now and is basically end product. What helped Bindon was not only his obvious ability and match intelligence, it was being partnered with the very quick and powerful Mbengue at the back. They were the perfect foil for each other.WestYorksRoyal wrote:He was out of position at RB and looked unconvincing. Even at CB, he got dominated by Rhodes at Blackpool and had a costly poor game at home to Barnsley. He learned quickly and it became clear pretty quickly he was destined for a higher level. But there were bumps in the road.MR. CYNICAL wrote:How can you say Burns is ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago?WestYorksRoyal wrote:I just think of course our players aren't as good as Bindon, Mbengue, Knibbs, Smith and Azeez, who are all playing at a higher level for a reason.
But do they match them for potential compared to 2 years ago? Obvious example - Lane is a similar age to Knibbs when we signed him, and already has a L1 season under his belt with double figures goals and assists. We should be able to help him develop like we did Knibbs. Kyerewaa is raw, quick without composure and end product but works hard, like Azeez was. Burns has come out of the City academy, looks decent on the ball and has >50 EFL appearances under his belt. He potentially has a higher ceiling than O'Connor and Williams and is definitely ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago, but looks like a liability in this team. O'Mahony had a promising loan at Portsmouth in the Championship and has dominated the PL U21s league; we held off a lot of competition to sign him. But he looks lost.
But we say the squad isn't as good as last year and experienced players are injured. Well I'm calling bullshit. It's the nature of L1 to lose your best players, and the coaching staff's job is to develop new ones, which we're failing miserably in. Clubs like Wimbledon, Bradford and Stevenage don't have as squads as good as ours on paper, but they are better teams due to better coaching.
You say he looks a liability in the team, Bindon was never that and looked class from day one.
Now MIA in the Maranakis football multiverse. Such a fate has befallen Bindon and Richards.MR. CYNICAL wrote:To be fair, I'd forgotten about AbbeyWestYorksRoyal wrote:Of course I'd prefer the Bindon who left us this summer to Burns; I'd prefer him to any of our CBs and indeed any CB in L1. But it wasn't always obvious he was at that level - I'm not convinced he was this time 2 years ago. Abbey was higher rated by a lot of fans initially.MR. CYNICAL wrote: Maybe so, he started at centre back but for some reason Selles decided to play him at right back for a few games where admittedly he looked uncomfortable, but I'd prefer him to Burns any day.
Agree with all of this 100%.West F wrote:Bindon was 18 two years ago, Burns is 22 now and is basically end product. What helped Bindon was not only his obvious ability and match intelligence, it was being partnered with the very quick and powerful Mbengue at the back. They were the perfect foil for each other.WestYorksRoyal wrote:He was out of position at RB and looked unconvincing. Even at CB, he got dominated by Rhodes at Blackpool and had a costly poor game at home to Barnsley. He learned quickly and it became clear pretty quickly he was destined for a higher level. But there were bumps in the road.MR. CYNICAL wrote: How can you say Burns is ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago?
You say he looks a liability in the team, Bindon was never that and looked class from day one.
One thing that has been missing from us this season is the willingness for one of the centre backs to actually carry the ball and drive into midfield when there was no long pass on. It is something that Bindon did well last season when our opponents closed space and marked man for man when we were in possession at the back. When your centre backs are able to this, someone has to engage them and it opens the game up. Yesterday was a glaring example of this, where we resorted to hitting long balls, and surrendering possession over and over again. Bindon, Abbey and Mbengue could all carry the ball forwards and drive into midfield space. To be fair to Burns. I think he is the only centre back we have who could do this now. Hence, punts into channels and fight balls for the striker in the hope of catching second balls. It really doesn’t work when the opposition play a five in midfield, the odds are very much that they will be picking up second balls.
That source being notorious wind up merchant Brogue.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Has now lost the fans and the dressing room.
Fraser is not injured but had a bust up with Hunt; as has Lane (but is still being selected). (source Huang Kad)
Time to go - NOW
It's never just about individual quality. It's always more about how players mesh and how they fit into the whole.Hound wrote:I’ll throw a suggestion out that maybe some of our ‘best’ players from last year or 2 weren’t actually that special and good coaching and tactics made them look goodWestYorksRoyal wrote:I just think of course our players aren't as good as Bindon, Mbengue, Knibbs, Smith and Azeez, who are all playing at a higher level for a reason.
But do they match them for potential compared to 2 years ago? Obvious example - Lane is a similar age to Knibbs when we signed him, and already has a L1 season under his belt with double figures goals and assists. We should be able to help him develop like we did Knibbs. Kyerewaa is raw, quick without composure and end product but works hard, like Azeez was. Burns has come out of the City academy, looks decent on the ball and has >50 EFL appearances under his belt. He potentially has a higher ceiling than O'Connor and Williams and is definitely ahead of where Bindon was 2 years ago, but looks like a liability in this team. O'Mahony had a promising loan at Portsmouth in the Championship and has dominated the PL U21s league; we held off a lot of competition to sign him. But he looks lost.
But we say the squad isn't as good as last year and experienced players are injured. Well I'm calling bullshit. It's the nature of L1 to lose your best players, and the coaching staff's job is to develop new ones, which we're failing miserably in. Clubs like Wimbledon, Bradford and Stevenage don't have as squads as good as ours on paper, but they are better teams due to better coaching.
Bindon is perma-benched, Knibbs and Smith get a few mins at the end of the game. Abbey went nowhere. Vickers is back in L1. Holmes and McIntyre went nowhere and back in L1. Harris at Tranmere on loan
Mbengue has done pretty well tbf but Paudie should cover him at this level . Azeez is now but took him a long time
And were clearly pissed off with those chants directed at him yesterday.Snowflake Royal wrote:That source being notorious wind up merchant Brogue.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:Has now lost the fans and the dressing room.
Fraser is not injured but had a bust up with Hunt; as has Lane (but is still being selected). (source Huang Kad)
Time to go - NOW
Lost the dressing room my arse. They were all buddy buddy with him after Northampton ffs.
Users browsing this forum: 78royal, Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 925 guests