by The Royal Forester » 15 Jan 2024 11:12
15 Jan 2024 11:12
In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.Dirk Gently wrote:It was the very last match of the season and the result didn't have any effect on the league label, so they fudged it and let the results stand. I doubt they'll do that here as it's only Jan.Royals and Racers wrote:Was the Blackpool v Huddersfield match re-played or points given to Huddersfield ?Dirk Gently wrote:The FA will no doubt impose a fine for "failure to control supporters", and the FL will no doubt impose a suspended points deduction - this is based on precedent of the Blackpool vs Huddersfield abandonment in May 2015.
If the FL *don't* do these they know they're opening the doors for more and more pitch invasions and abandonments, as well as leaving themselves open to criticism from clubs who've had these punishments before.
I would be amazed if they didn't replay this.Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.Dirk Gently wrote:It was the very last match of the season and the result didn't have any effect on the league label, so they fudged it and let the results stand. I doubt they'll do that here as it's only Jan.Royals and Racers wrote: Was the Blackpool v Huddersfield match re-played or points given to Huddersfield ?
For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.
Theres no point doing this against Port Vale again. Their fans are on our side. Lets keep them there.Forbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.
He started the process in September, and any sale negotiations are subject to NDAReading4eva wrote:Theres no point doing this against Port Vale again. Their fans are on our side. Lets keep them there.Forbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.
I think the game that should be earmarked is Leyton Orient if at all. Hopefully Dai will have started the process of selling by then which if thats the case, just final parting shots and banners in the stadium will be enough.
Plus as a side who have suffered similar struggles in the past, they will be sympathetic and are sympathetic from what I've seen
I think more abandonments will be counterproductive, and just piss people off, and won't get the same publicity. I would also suspect any points deduction we get from the football league will contain a much larger suspended penalty, meaning if we do it again, we will be relegated barring a miraculous set of results.Reading4eva wrote:Theres no point doing this against Port Vale again. Their fans are on our side. Lets keep them there.Forbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.
I think the game that should be earmarked is Leyton Orient if at all. Hopefully Dai will have started the process of selling by then which if thats the case, just final parting shots and banners in the stadium will be enough.
Plus as a side who have suffered similar struggles in the past, they will be sympathetic and are sympathetic from what I've seen
https://motionmapping.co.uk/what-we-do/ ... n-mapping/tmesis wrote:I think more abandonments will be counterproductive, and just piss people off, and won't get the same publicity. I would also suspect any points deduction we get from the football league will contain a much larger suspended penalty, meaning if we do it again, we will be relegated barring a miraculous set of results.Reading4eva wrote:Theres no point doing this against Port Vale again. Their fans are on our side. Lets keep them there.Forbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?
I think the game that should be earmarked is Leyton Orient if at all. Hopefully Dai will have started the process of selling by then which if thats the case, just final parting shots and banners in the stadium will be enough.
Plus as a side who have suffered similar struggles in the past, they will be sympathetic and are sympathetic from what I've seen
It's easier said than done, but we need to be creative.
I’ve been thinking along these lines and perhaps try and get a big crowd in, noisy and vocal support for the team and manager and then all (or all those that support action), leave en masse on the 71st minute and walk together back in to town, followed by a few hours drinking in town. Would be great to see 5-6000 people just get up and leave and walk together from the ground in to town.tmesis wrote:I think more abandonments will be counterproductive, and just piss people off, and won't get the same publicity. I would also suspect any points deduction we get from the football league will contain a much larger suspended penalty, meaning if we do it again, we will be relegated barring a miraculous set of results.Reading4eva wrote:Theres no point doing this against Port Vale again. Their fans are on our side. Lets keep them there.Forbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?
I think the game that should be earmarked is Leyton Orient if at all. Hopefully Dai will have started the process of selling by then which if thats the case, just final parting shots and banners in the stadium will be enough.
Plus as a side who have suffered similar struggles in the past, they will be sympathetic and are sympathetic from what I've seen
It's easier said than done, but we need to be creative.
If he ceases all personal funding of the club. Then the other remaining Directors will have no other option. The Directors are obliged to cease to trade immediately. Trading insolvently is a criminal offence.Snowflake Royal wrote:Got anything to back that up?72 bus wrote:Banned from football puts the selling process in the hands of the administrator, best offer wins taking into account the creditors.tmesis wrote: I think one thing it does do is put more pressure on the EFL, and for them to press for him to be banned from football if/when they meet with the independent panel again, to decide on punishments.
It's hard to think of any action that would obviously make Dai more likely to sell, but the protests are helping force the issue far more than doing nothing would.
Dai's dept is mainly to himself so really Admin is the best outcome at the moment, which is why certain parties are holding back and not getting into a bidding scenario just yet.
I think we should for the lols..."we promise we defo won't do it this time...wwweeeeeaaayyyy!!"Forbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.
Should allow all of the travelling fans in for free, tooForbury Lion wrote:For the sake of the Port Vale fans, if it is rearranged and Reading fans are allowed to attend, Can we aim not to cause a second abandonment in the rearranged fixture?Stranded wrote:In the circumstance, I hope they ask for the game to be replayed - EFL love to stay how they want league positions to be earnt on the pitch, so handing a result to Vale would go against this. So it'll probably happen.
I doubt the guy sitting in Thailand gives a shit.Lower West wrote:If he ceases all personal funding of the club. Then the other remaining Directors will have no other option. The Directors are obliged to cease to trade immediately. Trading insolvently is a criminal offence.Snowflake Royal wrote:Got anything to back that up?72 bus wrote:
Banned from football puts the selling process in the hands of the administrator, best offer wins taking into account the creditors.
Dai's dept is mainly to himself so really Admin is the best outcome at the moment, which is why certain parties are holding back and not getting into a bidding scenario just yet.
I didn't want to have to break it this way but it's meWinston Biscuit wrote:Football Weekly podcast on Thursday will have a section on it dedicated to our situation
They will have an RFC fan on there to discuss it. Unsure if that will be a representative of SBWD or otherwise. Personally I hope otherwise.
don't forget to mention the streakers!BRO_BOT wrote:I didn't want to have to break it this way but it's meWinston Biscuit wrote:Football Weekly podcast on Thursday will have a section on it dedicated to our situation
They will have an RFC fan on there to discuss it. Unsure if that will be a representative of SBWD or otherwise. Personally I hope otherwise.
p.s. any ideas for project Mayhem