MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

186 posts

Result predictor

Poll ended at 22 Mar 2026 14:53
Stevenage win
13
57%
Draw
6
26%
Reading win
4
17%
 
Total votes: 23
User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33795
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by leon » 21 Mar 2026 17:04

We’re not going to make the playoffs

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3822
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Royalwaster » 21 Mar 2026 17:14

leon wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:04 We’re not going to make the playoffs
I wouldn't rule it out - but Plymouth look nailed on to win them. We don't even if we get into them.

under the tin
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1062
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 09:21
Location: Midway Pompey-Fareham

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by under the tin » 21 Mar 2026 17:18

leon wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:04 We’re not going to make the playoffs
Tru dat ^^^

Maybe it's as well. A summer clear out of dead wood, coupled with a structured summer recruitment, as opposed to the farce that preceded this season will leave the club stronger in the longer term.
Look on the bright side. We'll be better placed to give our neighbours down the M4, and up the A4074 a good thrashing next year!

My money's on Argyle to go up with Lincoln and Cardiff. They've got the same thing that we had in 2012. Momentum.

Linden Jones' Tash
Member
Posts: 953
Joined: 20 Jun 2009 12:03
Location: north of the river...

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Linden Jones' Tash » 21 Mar 2026 17:21

under the tin wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:18
leon wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:04 We’re not going to make the playoffs
Tru dat ^^^

Maybe it's as well. A summer clear out of dead wood, coupled with a structured summer recruitment, as opposed to the farce that preceded this season will leave the club stronger in the longer term.
Look on the bright side. We'll be better placed to give our neighbours down the M4, and up the A4074 a good thrashing next year!

My money's on Argyle to go up with Lincoln and Cardiff. They've got the same thing that we had in 2012. Momentum.
Will the owners fund this level of spending having splashed the cash in January?...

Remember we don't have a sugar daddy owner - pumping in a million pounds a month for another 12 months won't be simple...

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9363
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by windermereROYAL » 21 Mar 2026 17:22

I`ll be delighted to finish the season on May 2nd, it`s been a struggle to get enthusiastic about any of this shit show.
Give Leam the summer and see what he can do with it.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33795
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by leon » 21 Mar 2026 17:23

under the tin wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:18
leon wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:04 We’re not going to make the playoffs
Tru dat ^^^

Maybe it's as well. A summer clear out of dead wood, coupled with a structured summer recruitment, as opposed to the farce that preceded this season will leave the club stronger in the longer term.
Look on the bright side. We'll be better placed to give our neighbours down the M4, and up the A4074 a good thrashing next year!

My money's on Argyle to go up with Lincoln and Cardiff. They've got the same thing that we had in 2012. Momentum.
Maybe leam will learn that a football match has 2 halfs.

Getthebeerens
Member
Posts: 133
Joined: 29 Jul 2018 22:44

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Getthebeerens » 21 Mar 2026 17:29

windermereROYAL wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:22 I`ll be delighted to finish the season on May 2nd, it`s been a struggle to get enthusiastic about any of this shit show.
Give Leam the summer and see what he can do with it.
Not sure I would want to give Leam the summer if we are playing the same awful football. Can’t fault him on results but it’s really tough to watch and certainly not entertaining. Really considering not renewing my season ticket next season.

South Coast Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7454
Joined: 16 Jan 2020 17:29

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by South Coast Royal » 21 Mar 2026 17:31

Snowflake Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 16:01
South Coast Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 15:58 I know that everybody says it's the result that matters at the "business end" of the season but this is dire stuff from both teams and this time I don't think the pitch can be blamed..
If you didn't know you would guess that this was a game between two mid-table sides in the Conference with nothing to play for.

As we have said so many times this season, the second half has to be better.
BTW I had forgotten that Doyle (much improved of late) was playing until the game was in added time.
Pitch quality is fine, but size is playing a big factor. It's very narrow and that's making everything tight.

Stevenage don't score many and they concede even fewer.

It's not an exciting match, but I wouldn’t say it's particular poor quality or error prone, just good defending and limited space.

Checking online, their pitch seems to be 4 metres narrower than ours and about 1 shorter. That's quite a lot of pitch missing.
So, knowing that the pitch is smaller presumably the manager and coaches spent preparation time by narrowing the training pitch in preparation when training since Tuesday?
That is the great benefit of having a modern training facility.
Or did they?

You reckon it wasn't poor quality-let's settle for" unimaginative" football but with Stevenage showing much, much more determination and just a little imagination.

Whoever goes up with Lincoln and Cardiff will need to spend some millions just to stay up.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6172
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Extended-Phenotype » 21 Mar 2026 18:12

Drearily, and typically, too deep. Few players with any courage on the ball, always wanting too many touches, before succumbing to even the gentlest press, giving in and going backwards. How many times do we need to see ourselves NOT do that and create decent half/full chances?

If I were Leam, I’d be saying “lose the ball going forward. You’ll lose it anyway, might as well be in their third rather than ours.”

Keane isn’t working for me. He’s certainly not good enough to be keeping Doyle out of the middle. No idea if R.Williams is now out, but surely we can get width from somewhere other than having to play Doyle there.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27407
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Hound » 21 Mar 2026 18:23

The inability to ever keep a clean sheet is what’s hurting us most at the moment. Is that 12 in a row without a clean sheet? Not good enough. Some games you need to hold out for a 0-0 and we weren’t capable

Forwards generally doing enough for us but you can’t score every single game - often more than once

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 49339
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Snowflake Royal » 21 Mar 2026 18:39

Hound wrote: 21 Mar 2026 18:23 The inability to ever keep a clean sheet is what’s hurting us most at the moment. Is that 12 in a row without a clean sheet? Not good enough. Some games you need to hold out for a 0-0 and we weren’t capable

Forwards generally doing enough for us but you can’t score every single game - often more than once
Tbf, we keep more clean sheets, than fire blanks. 7 vs 5 I think.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 33795
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by leon » 21 Mar 2026 18:55

Snowflake Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 18:39
Hound wrote: 21 Mar 2026 18:23 The inability to ever keep a clean sheet is what’s hurting us most at the moment. Is that 12 in a row without a clean sheet? Not good enough. Some games you need to hold out for a 0-0 and we weren’t capable

Forwards generally doing enough for us but you can’t score every single game - often more than once
Tbf, we keep more clean sheets, than fire blanks. 7 vs 5 I think.
It’s being shit that hurts us. Backwards passing imaginationless, weak willed shit

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27407
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Hound » 21 Mar 2026 19:14

Snowflake Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 18:39
Hound wrote: 21 Mar 2026 18:23 The inability to ever keep a clean sheet is what’s hurting us most at the moment. Is that 12 in a row without a clean sheet? Not good enough. Some games you need to hold out for a 0-0 and we weren’t capable

Forwards generally doing enough for us but you can’t score every single game - often more than once
Tbf, we keep more clean sheets, than fire blanks. 7 vs 5 I think.
Maybe over the season but talking more recently. We had a spell where we kept a couple and looked solid

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12210
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by RoyalBlue » 21 Mar 2026 19:27

South Coast Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:31
Snowflake Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 16:01
South Coast Royal wrote: 21 Mar 2026 15:58 I know that everybody says it's the result that matters at the "business end" of the season but this is dire stuff from both teams and this time I don't think the pitch can be blamed..
If you didn't know you would guess that this was a game between two mid-table sides in the Conference with nothing to play for.

As we have said so many times this season, the second half has to be better.
BTW I had forgotten that Doyle (much improved of late) was playing until the game was in added time.
Pitch quality is fine, but size is playing a big factor. It's very narrow and that's making everything tight.

Stevenage don't score many and they concede even fewer.

It's not an exciting match, but I wouldn’t say it's particular poor quality or error prone, just good defending and limited space.

Checking online, their pitch seems to be 4 metres narrower than ours and about 1 shorter. That's quite a lot of pitch missing.
So, knowing that the pitch is smaller presumably the manager and coaches spent preparation time by narrowing the training pitch in preparation when training since Tuesday?
That is the great benefit of having a modern training facility.
Or did they?
That would seem the sensible and logical thing to do but I'm not sure Richardson does 'sensible and logical'.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8273
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by tidus_mi2 » 21 Mar 2026 20:02

This is definitely why I've given up on away games, travel plus shite performances makes for a shit Saturday.

MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by MR. CYNICAL » 21 Mar 2026 20:56

tidus_mi2 wrote: 21 Mar 2026 20:02 This is definitely why I've given up on away games, travel plus shite performances makes for a shit Saturday.
Yep, me too, first away game this season, must be one of the worst performances of the season. Can't remember a shot on target, second half we hardly got in their box at all, let alone have a shot.
Constantly hoofing it from the back, inability to pass the ball through the midfield, reckon you'd see better football in the local park. Totally unacceptable performance.
Last edited by MR. CYNICAL on 21 Mar 2026 21:04, edited 1 time in total.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 9363
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by windermereROYAL » 21 Mar 2026 21:03

MR. CYNICAL wrote: 21 Mar 2026 20:56
tidus_mi2 wrote: 21 Mar 2026 20:02 This is definitely why I've given up on away games, travel plus shite performances makes for a shit Saturday.
Yep, me too, first away game this season, must be one of the worst performances of the season.
If it was worse than Mansfield it must have been hideous.

MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by MR. CYNICAL » 21 Mar 2026 21:08

windermereROYAL wrote: 21 Mar 2026 21:03
MR. CYNICAL wrote: 21 Mar 2026 20:56
tidus_mi2 wrote: 21 Mar 2026 20:02 This is definitely why I've given up on away games, travel plus shite performances makes for a shit Saturday.
Yep, me too, first away game this season, must be one of the worst performances of the season.
If it was worse than Mansfield it must have been hideous.
Believe me, it was bad. Lots of disgruntled fans too.
Not sure what Richardson and his 'coaching team' do with them all week, they played as if they've never played together before.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6172
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Extended-Phenotype » 21 Mar 2026 21:38

I sometimes wonder when managers comment a bit negatively about the players whether they are managing the freedom to try out of them.

Paul Ince seemed to basically give up on our team, believing them to be incapable of playing competitive football, and had them drilled to hang on and go long. I’m not saying Leam is the same, but his Q&A effectively inferred that if he had them play attacking football they would be relegated.

I think he’s drilling them to sit deep, not take too many chances, avoid the counter and try to get lucky on a long ball. And I think while that might be a decent stabilising strategy that will safely see us mid table, it’s not going to excite the fans or push us much higher than that.

I think we can do better.

User avatar
Brogue
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 17404
Joined: 02 Mar 2021 20:38
Location: Radio AE #3 Winner 2025

Re: MATCHWATCH : Stevenage (a)

by Brogue » 21 Mar 2026 21:48

under the tin wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:18
leon wrote: 21 Mar 2026 17:04 We’re not going to make the playoffs
Tru dat ^^^

Maybe it's as well. A summer clear out of dead wood, coupled with a structured summer recruitment, as opposed to the farce that preceded this season will leave the club stronger in the longer term.
Look on the bright side. We'll be better placed to give our neighbours down the M4, and up the A4074 a good thrashing next year!

My money's on Argyle to go up with Lincoln and Cardiff. They've got the same thing that we had in 2012. Momentum.

I don’t disagree. But isn’t a sorry state of affairs that we need to clear out deadwood when we only had 7 in contract players at the beginning of the season. One might suggest that the deadwood had already been cleared, and then some… to have deadwood already…? Heads should roll.

186 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Tinpot Royal and 116 guests

It is currently 08 May 2026 18:20