Didn’t he start out managing at Bristol City, after he left Supertramp, back In the early 80s?Royal Rother wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:02 Hodgson?That's one of the oddest appointments I've ever seen.
What are the club's thoughts behind it?
Why is he taking it?
I suppose he might be missing football but I find the whole thing a bit weird.
Ah yes, very good on all fronts!Sutekh wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:41Didn’t he start out managing at Bristol City, after he left Supertramp, back In the early 80s?Royal Rother wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:02 Hodgson?That's one of the oddest appointments I've ever seen.
What are the club's thoughts behind it?
Why is he taking it?
I suppose he might be missing football but I find the whole thing a bit weird.
Therefore it’s logical![]()
His first stint at City was blighted by their financial collapse at the time so suspect his short tenure may have been more of a cost cutting exercise than necessarily a reflection on his ability.Royal Rother wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 15:06Ah yes, very good on all fronts!Sutekh wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:41Didn’t he start out managing at Bristol City, after he left Supertramp, back In the early 80s?Royal Rother wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:02 Hodgson?That's one of the oddest appointments I've ever seen.
What are the club's thoughts behind it?
Why is he taking it?
I suppose he might be missing football but I find the whole thing a bit weird.
Therefore it’s logical![]()
![]()
(I'd forgotten that. But he WAS sacked after 4 months in charge - unfinished business is a bit weak, but who knows?!)
Quite right!Sutekh wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:41Didn’t he start out managing at Bristol City, after he left Supertramp, back In the early 80s?Royal Rother wrote: ↑27 Mar 2026 13:02 Hodgson?That's one of the oddest appointments I've ever seen.
What are the club's thoughts behind it?
Why is he taking it?
I suppose he might be missing football but I find the whole thing a bit weird.
Therefore it’s logical![]()
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 11 guests