Reading v Swansea - Match 25 - 2022-2023 Prediction League

[Snowball]

Match TUESDAY 27th 17:15

Bonuses for Correct Format
and in by

15 in by 23:59 Monday
12 in by 08:59 Tuesday
07 in by 11:59 Tuesday
03 in by 14:59 Friday


No entries accepted after 14:59

First Team Scoring, Half, Time
First Reading Scorer, Time
“From Behind” etc

must be explicitly stated (not implied) for extra points.

EXAMPLE


Reading 1-1 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 2-2 Swansea FT


Swansea to Score First in First Half (19)

Reading to DRAW from Behind
Swansea to DRAW from Behind

SEQUENCE

(19) Reading 0-1 Swansea
(41) Reading 1-1 Swansea
===================================
(59) Reading 2-1 Swansea (INCE, alt Long)
(89) Reading 2-2 Swansea (CARROLL, alt Ince)


This is not necessarily my prediction
but if I fail to post a fresh one, use this.

[Snowball]

Leaders going into the game

469 Snowball
442 Royal Forester
441 MorganB
434 Horsham Royal
429 Franconian Royal
390 Regular John
340 Royal Jimmy
327 Moon Pig
001 Jackson Corner

[ILoveMoonPig]

Hard to see anything other than a defeat against Swansea really. They seem to have a knack for beating us.

Reading 0-1 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 1-3 Swansea FT


Swansea to Score First in First Half (30)

Sequence

(30) Reading 0-1 Swansea
===================================
(52) Reading 0-2 Swansea
(68) Reading 0-3 Swansea
(87) Reading 1-3 Swansea (João alt Fornah)

[morganb]

Reading 0-0 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 2-1 Swansea FT


Reading to Score First in Second Half (60)


SEQUENCE

Reading 0-0 Swansea
===================================
(60) Reading 1-0 Swansea (INCE, alt Meite)
(70) Reading 2-0 Swansea (CARROLL, alt Joao)
(80) Reading 2-1 Swansea

[Franconian Royal]

Reading 0 Swans 1 HT
——
Reading 2 Swans 1 FT

Swans to score first in 13’
Reading to win from behind

—-
Sequence:

Reading 0 Swans 1 (13’) HT
——
Reading 1 Swans 1 (TINce 65’ alt João)
Reading 2 Swans 1 (João 78’ alt TINce)

[Royal_jimmy]

We've not beaten this lot at home since 2008. Got to beat them eventually but I don't think it'll be this season.

Reading 0-2 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 0-2 Swansea FT


Swansea to Score First in First Half (7)

Sequence

(7) Reading 0-1 Swansea
(26) Reading 0-2 Swansea
==================================

[Horsham Royal]

Reading 1-0 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 1-1 Swansea FT

Reading to Score First in First Half (20)

Swansea to DRAW from Behind

SEQUENCE

(20) Reading 1-0 Swansea (CARROLL, alt Meite)
===================================
(80) Reading 1-1 Swansea

[The Royal Forester]

Reading 0--1 Swansea HT
Reading 1--2 Swansea FT

Swansea to score first in first half 10 minutes

(10) Reading 0--1 Swansea
=================
(52) Reading 1---1 Swansea Carroll (alt. Ince)
(81) Reading 1---2 Swansea

[Regular John]

Reading 0-0 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 1-2 Swansea FT


Swansea to score first in second Half (51)


Reading 0-0 Swansea
===================================
(51) Reading 0-1 Swansea
(63) Reading 0-2 Swansea
(83) Reading 1-2 Swansea (CARROLL, alt Long)

[Jackson Corner]

Reading 0 Swansea 3
24; 67, 91

[Snowball]

Half-Time Points

24 Horsham Royal

17 Royal Forester
17 Regular John

15 Snowball
15 Moon Pig
15 MorganB
15 Franconian Royal
15 Royal Jimmy

00 Jackson Corner

[Snowball]

FULL-TIME POINTS

24 Horsham Royal

20 MorganB
20 Franconian Royal
17 Royal Forester
17 Regular John
15 Snowball
15 Moon Pig
15 Royal Jimmy

-3 Jackson Corner

[Snowball]

OVERALL

484 Snowball
461 MorganB
459 Royal Forester
458 Horsham Royal
449 Franconian Royal
407 Regular John
355 Royal Jimmy
342 Moon Pig
-02 Jackson Corner

[Franconian Royal]

FULL-TIME POINTS

24 Horsham Royal

20 MorganB
20 Franconian Royal
17 Royal Forester
17 Regular John
15 Snowball
15 Moon Pig
15 Royal Jimmy

-3 Jackson Corner

Please explain how Horsham got more points for wrong score? It makes no sense. If you don’t like me, that’s fine, but honestly your point scoring makes no sense.

[morganb]

FULL-TIME POINTS

24 Horsham Royal

20 MorganB
20 Franconian Royal
17 Royal Forester
17 Regular John
15 Snowball
15 Moon Pig
15 Royal Jimmy

-3 Jackson Corner

Please explain how Horsham got more points for wrong score? It makes no sense. If you don’t like me, that’s fine, but honestly your point scoring makes no sense.

I'm guessing here but the scoring looks to be the proverbial game of two halves - correct first goalscorer and correct half time result probably gets H more points than our final score right?

[Franconian Royal]

FULL-TIME POINTS

24 Horsham Royal

20 MorganB
20 Franconian Royal
17 Royal Forester
17 Regular John
15 Snowball
15 Moon Pig
15 Royal Jimmy

-3 Jackson Corner

Please explain how Horsham got more points for wrong score? It makes no sense. If you don’t like me, that’s fine, but honestly your point scoring makes no sense.

I'm guessing here but the scoring looks to be the proverbial game of two halves - correct first goalscorer and correct half time result probably gets H more points than our final score right?

If that's the case, then fine. All I'd like is for there to be a little more explanation of the point giving.

[Snowball]

Reading 1-0 Swansea HT
==================
Reading 1-1 Swansea FT

Reading to Score First in First Half (20)

Swansea to DRAW from Behind

SEQUENCE

(20) Reading 1-0 Swansea (CARROLL, alt Meite)
===================================
(80) Reading 1-1 Swansea

HORSHAM GETS

15 BONUS
04 FOR CARROLL FIRST RDG SCORER, CORRECT HALF
03 FOR CORRECT HT SCORE
02 FOR Reading to Score First in First Half (20)

24

[Snowball]

Reading 0 Swans 1 HT
——
Reading 2 Swans 1 FT

Swans to score first in 13’
Reading to win from behind

—-
Sequence:

Reading 0 Swans 1 (13’) HT
——
Reading 1 Swans 1 (TINce 65’ alt João)
Reading 2 Swans 1 (João 78’ alt TINce)

FRANCONIAN GETS

15 BONUS
05 CORRECT FINAL SCORE

20

NOT
Correct First Team to score
Correct HT Score or result
Correct RDG Scorer

[Snowball]

I've posted how the points work hundreds of time

15 BONUS (up to 15)

03 Correct HT Score
01 Correct HT Result
05 Correct FT Score
02 Correct FT result
02 Correct First Team to Score, Correct Half
01 Correct First Team to Score, wrong half

04 Correct First RDG Scorer (Primary) Correct Half
02 Correct First RDG Scorer (Alt've) Correct Half
02 Correct First RDG Scorer (Primary) Wrong Half Half
01 Correct First RDG Scorer (Alt've) Wrong Half

(Bonuses for Score time = or - 1 minutes

Bonuses for correct sequence (only happens 1-2 times a season)

10 Bonus for away side WINNing from behind
05 Bonus for away side drawing from behind

04 Bonus for HOME side winning from behind
02 Bonus for HOME side drawing from behind

Sequence Scores

Start at 10 points for a correct 3-goal sequence
(goals in correct halves, times irrelevant) but super
bonuses when sequence correct as above and RDG scorers
and/or times correct (+ or - 1)... or opponent times ditto,

3-goals means both sides must score (2-1 or 1-2)

In all sequences, both sides must score. 3-0, 4-0, 5-0 means nothing

[Snowball]

Imagine Norwich v Reading


Norwich 1-0 Reading HT
==================
Norwich 1-2 Reading FT


Norwich to score first in First Half 42nd minutes
Reading to win from behind

SEQUENCE

(42) Norwich 1-0 Reading
=====================
(54) Norwich 1-1 Reading (CARROL, alt Ince)
(89) Norwich 1-2 Reading (Ince, alt Long)

Someone gets this EXACTLY right

15 Bonus
09 CARROL first RDG Scorer exact time
05 FT Score
03 HT Score
02 Norwich to score first, correct half

34

10 Reading win from behind
05 for smack on Norwich time
10 for Carroll's first goal (yes a second time)
05 For Ince's goal exact

30

64 TOTAL


four-goal correct sequences score 20, 5-goalers 40, 6-goalers 60 (plus any exact scorers/times (exact being = or - a minute