by Brogue » 16 Jan 2023 08:41
16 Jan 2023 08:41by Brogue » 16 Jan 2023 08:50
16 Jan 2023 08:50
by paultheroyal » 16 Jan 2023 09:10
16 Jan 2023 09:10by YorkshireRoyal99 » 16 Jan 2023 10:18
16 Jan 2023 10:18by Snowflake Royal » 16 Jan 2023 18:33
16 Jan 2023 18:33by SCIAG » 16 Jan 2023 22:45
16 Jan 2023 22:45by Snowflake Royal » 16 Jan 2023 23:14
16 Jan 2023 23:14by tidus_mi2 » 17 Jan 2023 01:50
17 Jan 2023 01:50by Hound » 17 Jan 2023 08:33
17 Jan 2023 08:33by YorkshireRoyal99 » 17 Jan 2023 09:04
17 Jan 2023 09:04by Hound » 17 Jan 2023 09:18
17 Jan 2023 09:18by Hound » 17 Jan 2023 09:21
17 Jan 2023 09:21by YorkshireRoyal99 » 17 Jan 2023 09:59
17 Jan 2023 09:59
by paultheroyal » 17 Jan 2023 12:01
17 Jan 2023 12:01Snowflake Royal wrote:Paul wants to release Long and Moore
by paultheroyal » 17 Jan 2023 12:04
17 Jan 2023 12:04by Hound » 17 Jan 2023 12:11
17 Jan 2023 12:11by CavershamRoyal » 17 Jan 2023 12:51
17 Jan 2023 12:51Lumley, Rotherham away aside, has been one of our best performers. He’s definitely won us more points than he’s lost. Has made some really good saves to keep us in games recently, and I hope that we offer him a contract in the summer. Not sure we’ll get anyone much better.SCIAG wrote:Personally I'd find it too hard to do that exercise because it depends on unknowns like wages and whether we can identify replacements.
Dann, Long, and Moore are pretty obvious "gos", unless they're willing to agree below-average wages.
Joao is better than anyone else we are likely to get in, but would probably receive an offer we can't keep up with. Probably similar from Meite.
Lumley is not up to this level and should be the first one out the door. Loum, Hendrick, and Fornah are good enough, but WCBAP - and while they're quite different players, not sure it makes sense to have both Hendrick and Hutchinson as geriatric midfielders. Rahman might be the best we can do in his position, but he's rarely lived up to his reputation and wouldn't warrant anything close to his Chelsea wages. Hoilett has looked very useful this season and we can certainly get another year out of him.
Tetek's injuries are a concern, but he's still very young, cheap, and has looked good in those occasional appearances.
by Snowflake Royal » 17 Jan 2023 18:12
17 Jan 2023 18:12Don't agree that's at all the case.CavershamRoyal wrote:Lumley, Rotherham away aside, has been one of our best performers. He’s definitely won us more points than he’s lost. Has made some really good saves to keep us in games recently, and I hope that we offer him a contract in the summer. Not sure we’ll get anyone much better.SCIAG wrote:Personally I'd find it too hard to do that exercise because it depends on unknowns like wages and whether we can identify replacements.
Dann, Long, and Moore are pretty obvious "gos", unless they're willing to agree below-average wages.
Joao is better than anyone else we are likely to get in, but would probably receive an offer we can't keep up with. Probably similar from Meite.
Lumley is not up to this level and should be the first one out the door. Loum, Hendrick, and Fornah are good enough, but WCBAP - and while they're quite different players, not sure it makes sense to have both Hendrick and Hutchinson as geriatric midfielders. Rahman might be the best we can do in his position, but he's rarely lived up to his reputation and wouldn't warrant anything close to his Chelsea wages. Hoilett has looked very useful this season and we can certainly get another year out of him.
Tetek's injuries are a concern, but he's still very young, cheap, and has looked good in those occasional appearances.
by Hound » 17 Jan 2023 21:38
17 Jan 2023 21:38by Pepe the Horseman » 18 Jan 2023 04:31
18 Jan 2023 04:31Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bazzaballs, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], RG30 and 188 guests