
Happy with this or not?

That is the only positive. If he pays. IF.NathStPaul wrote:If it pays the bills short term then great. The guy has an awful track record though, don't trust him as far as I could throw him.
Taken from other threads but people are saying anything under 25% investment does not require efl approvalCrowbar6753 wrote:So if this is just extra funding does it come under the same scrutiny by the EFL and therefor requires their approval? If not and he is only helping pay a few bills which in turn hopefully stops these annoying three point deductions then i guess its not to bad!!
If he has anything more to do with the club then its nothing more than a band aid on an axe wound lol.
Ok thanks Brogue, so i guessing he'll have little influence at the club as surly he'd never get approval for anything more than this amountBrogue wrote:Taken from other threads but people are saying anything under 25% investment does not require efl approvalCrowbar6753 wrote:So if this is just extra funding does it come under the same scrutiny by the EFL and therefor requires their approval? If not and he is only helping pay a few bills which in turn hopefully stops these annoying three point deductions then i guess its not to bad!!
If he has anything more to do with the club then its nothing more than a band aid on an axe wound lol.
+ there is no such thing as a fit and proper person test. But aside from that and the 25% rule jimmys post is 100% correctFrom Despair To Where? wrote:Do keep up,there is no test if the level of investment is less than 25% of the club's value.
Wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case either. Constantly does it with F1 as well, for nothing to materialise.Pepe the Horseman wrote:Pretty sure he's just attention seeking and there's nothing actually in this.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot], Horsham Royal, Royals and Racers, tidus_mi2 and 58 guests