Or there will be some sales in January and our squad is weaker afterwards.Snowflake Royal wrote:Normally you wouldn’t want to push games into a massive bunch in Feb/March, but more we have later when we might actually have a half competent owner and manager, the better.
Wish we could sell the owner.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Or there will be some sales in January and our squad is weaker afterwards.Snowflake Royal wrote:Normally you wouldn’t want to push games into a massive bunch in Feb/March, but more we have later when we might actually have a half competent owner and manager, the better.
Even if we could, who would buy him?Sutekh wrote:Wish we could sell the owner.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Or there will be some sales in January and our squad is weaker afterwards.Snowflake Royal wrote:Normally you wouldn’t want to push games into a massive bunch in Feb/March, but more we have later when we might actually have a half competent owner and manager, the better.
Can't see it being much weaker.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Or there will be some sales in January and our squad is weaker afterwards.Snowflake Royal wrote:Normally you wouldn’t want to push games into a massive bunch in Feb/March, but more we have later when we might actually have a half competent owner and manager, the better.
Hmm interesting point, am guessing there is zero president for L1 side losing 3 players to a mid-season tournament.Sutekh wrote:Don’t you need three players out to be able to postpone games? Reading could give themselves a complete rest in January.
I think it may just be tough luck, can't remember any championship games called off due to Afcon 2 years ago...Stranded wrote:Hmm interesting point, am guessing there is zero president for L1 side losing 3 players to a mid-season tournament.Sutekh wrote:Don’t you need three players out to be able to postpone games? Reading could give themselves a complete rest in January.
In theory, we could not play a League game after Exeter until the match at Oxford.
Yeah but did any single club have 3 African players called up?Mid Sussex Royal wrote:I think it may just be tough luck, can't remember any championship games called off due to Afcon 2 years ago...Stranded wrote:Hmm interesting point, am guessing there is zero president for L1 side losing 3 players to a mid-season tournament.Sutekh wrote:Don’t you need three players out to be able to postpone games? Reading could give themselves a complete rest in January.
In theory, we could not play a League game after Exeter until the match at Oxford.
Fair play, may well do him good to go away for a bit.Orion1871 wrote:Elliott called up to the full Cameroon squad.
Yeah agree, won’t be a huge loss currently for us but the experience etc may well help himStranded wrote:Fair play, may well do him good to go away for a bit.Orion1871 wrote:Elliott called up to the full Cameroon squad.
Any players who are sold are likely to be our better players. Azeez and Ehibhatiomhan would be two obvious ones.Snowflake Royal wrote:Can't see it being much weaker.WestYorksRoyal wrote:Or there will be some sales in January and our squad is weaker afterwards.Snowflake Royal wrote:Normally you wouldn’t want to push games into a massive bunch in Feb/March, but more we have later when we might actually have a half competent owner and manager, the better.
The players likely to go for any money or at the higher end of the wage bill are either in positions we have cover or aren't playing much.
Vickers - barely playing
Holmes - loads of CBs
Bindon - loads of CBs
Abbey - loads of CBs
Is anyone going to pay much for Smith? Wing? Button? Not likely for a Championship club and L1 clubs can't afford to.
Firstly, anyone who doesn't have a release fee triggered would need Dai to sign off on a sale. He's not interested. And he turns down sales for our better players out of pride when he is interested.tmesis wrote:Any players who are sold are likely to be our better players. Azeez and Ehibhatiomhan would be two obvious ones.Snowflake Royal wrote:Can't see it being much weaker.WestYorksRoyal wrote: Or there will be some sales in January and our squad is weaker afterwards.
The players likely to go for any money or at the higher end of the wage bill are either in positions we have cover or aren't playing much.
Vickers - barely playing
Holmes - loads of CBs
Bindon - loads of CBs
Abbey - loads of CBs
Is anyone going to pay much for Smith? Wing? Button? Not likely for a Championship club and L1 clubs can't afford to.
With our financial position, and an uninterested owner, a few clubs might test the water with bids that an owner who cared would reject, but Dai might accept for the quick cash.
Dai turned down sales previously because he presumably still thought getting to the premier league was an option. That doesn't seem to be the case any more, so he just wants rid.Snowflake Royal wrote:Firstly, anyone who doesn't have a release fee triggered would need Dai to sign off on a sale. He's not interested. And he turns down sales for our better players out of pride when he is interested.tmesis wrote:Any players who are sold are likely to be our better players. Azeez and Ehibhatiomhan would be two obvious ones.Snowflake Royal wrote: Can't see it being much weaker.
The players likely to go for any money or at the higher end of the wage bill are either in positions we have cover or aren't playing much.
Vickers - barely playing
Holmes - loads of CBs
Bindon - loads of CBs
Abbey - loads of CBs
Is anyone going to pay much for Smith? Wing? Button? Not likely for a Championship club and L1 clubs can't afford to.
With our financial position, and an uninterested owner, a few clubs might test the water with bids that an owner who cared would reject, but Dai might accept for the quick cash.
Even if that isn't an obstacle:
Our better players are Azeez, Wing, Smith, Button and Abbey. Abbey we can afford to sell as we're well stocked at CB.
Wing has been around long enough he's not going to be attracting the sort of interest that would persuade us to sell. Same as Button.
What Championship club is going to spend seven figures on Smith? Or Azeez? Why would we sell them cheap?
Ehibhatiomhan isn't going to get any interest bar Championship Academies. He's barely playing. Which means he's not exactly an immediate loss to the first team either.
I'll be astonished if we lose anyone crucial to the first team in the transfer window.
If he just wanted rid, he'd have sold us already.tmesis wrote:Dai turned down sales previously because he presumably still thought getting to the premier league was an option. That doesn't seem to be the case any more, so he just wants rid.Snowflake Royal wrote:Firstly, anyone who doesn't have a release fee triggered would need Dai to sign off on a sale. He's not interested. And he turns down sales for our better players out of pride when he is interested.tmesis wrote: Any players who are sold are likely to be our better players. Azeez and Ehibhatiomhan would be two obvious ones.
With our financial position, and an uninterested owner, a few clubs might test the water with bids that an owner who cared would reject, but Dai might accept for the quick cash.
Even if that isn't an obstacle:
Our better players are Azeez, Wing, Smith, Button and Abbey. Abbey we can afford to sell as we're well stocked at CB.
Wing has been around long enough he's not going to be attracting the sort of interest that would persuade us to sell. Same as Button.
What Championship club is going to spend seven figures on Smith? Or Azeez? Why would we sell them cheap?
Ehibhatiomhan isn't going to get any interest bar Championship Academies. He's barely playing. Which means he's not exactly an immediate loss to the first team either.
I'll be astonished if we lose anyone crucial to the first team in the transfer window.
Clubs higher up might see us as being in the same boat Cambridge were when we got Kitson for a steal, and offer prices lower than would normally be accepted. If Dai no longer cares, and just wants cash in, he's more likely to accept a low deal. They wouldn't need to be offering seven figure prices.