Are you? I’d have thought it was the only way we’d be able to bring players in.traff wrote:Reading spent the second-highest amount on agent fees (league One) in the last 12 months only Derby spent more than £434k
I am rather surprised by this given all of our spending restrictions anyone. Is this needs must, or do we deserve less sympathy than we thought?
Not the method but comparative amount to everyone else.Hendo wrote:Are you? I’d have thought it was the only way we’d be able to bring players in.traff wrote:Reading spent the second-highest amount on agent fees (league One) in the last 12 months only Derby spent more than £434k
I am rather surprised by this given all of our spending restrictions anyone. Is this needs must, or do we deserve less sympathy than we thought?
Not surprised by this in the slightest.
Symptomatic of the shambles we were conning players into joining imo.Hendo wrote:Are you? I’d have thought it was the only way we’d be able to bring players in.traff wrote:Reading spent the second-highest amount on agent fees (league One) in the last 12 months only Derby spent more than £434k
I am rather surprised by this given all of our spending restrictions anyone. Is this needs must, or do we deserve less sympathy than we thought?
Not surprised by this in the slightest.
Just because we weren't paying the player's previous club a fee doesn't mean there wasn't a contract. So part of it is contract negotiation fees, and the other part is essentially "finders fee". Like recruitment agents for normal jobs - the person getting the job doesn't pay the recruitment consultant, the hiring company does.Snowflake Royal wrote:Symptomatic of the shambles we were conning players into joining imo.Hendo wrote:Are you? I’d have thought it was the only way we’d be able to bring players in.traff wrote:Reading spent the second-highest amount on agent fees (league One) in the last 12 months only Derby spent more than £434k
I am rather surprised by this given all of our spending restrictions anyone. Is this needs must, or do we deserve less sympathy than we thought?
Not surprised by this in the slightest.
We paid basically no fees.
What exactly were we paying for?
Which the club was more or less forced into by the FL restrictions on being able to trade properly.Clyde1998 wrote:Looking at the list of players who’s agents we paid a fee to this season, it includes George Puscas. There were 23 separate instances of us paying an agent (an average of £17,300 per transaction).
Additionally whilst we paid the second highest agent fees (link), Fleetwood, Blackpool and Wigan are all within £10k of us.
Not currently in a position to do the maths per transaction, but we don’t from first glance appear to be paying agents a high amount per transaction compared to other League One clubs - we’ve simply had a large number of transactions this season.
Probably - and also when extending/renewing an agreement with an existing player too!rabidbee wrote:Presumably when Ejaria’s contract was paid up there would also have been an agent’s fee?
He's not on the list interestingly, despite appearing to have an agent.rabidbee wrote:Presumably when Ejaria’s contract was paid up there would also have been an agent’s fee?
Even more strange is the list appears to be in chronological order. Bouzanis was initially loaned in the summer, with an extension made in January. Only the extension appears to have had an agent fee related to it.Mid Sussex Royal wrote:There's a spreadsheet on Twitter somewhere and basically every player move, in & out and loans have an agent's fee, even the likes on Bouzanis going to a L2 side on loan.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], windermereROYAL and 81 guests