Re: Marriottleon wrote:Marriot (what are you on Hound?) and Williams. Possibly O’Connor just don’t know yet.
The rest - to be brutal, look absolutely fcuking shit.
He looks really good sometimes but he is a bit of a liability at the back. Certainly doesn’t deserve the hate even if he was unnecessary as a signing. Would have him level with Burns myselfSnowflake Royal wrote:I really don't get the Jacob hate. He started atrociously, and he still makes a few mistakes, but he's been perfectly fine most of the time.
For me, the best of a bad bunch of loanees.
Don’t rate Burns at all. He's awkward, he's slow, he's not very dominant in the air for a big guy, and he's not a ball player either.Hound wrote:He looks really good sometimes but he is a bit of a liability at the back. Certainly doesn’t deserve the hate even if he was unnecessary as a signing. Would have him level with Burns myselfSnowflake Royal wrote:I really don't get the Jacob hate. He started atrociously, and he still makes a few mistakes, but he's been perfectly fine most of the time.
For me, the best of a bad bunch of loanees.
Wasn’t it you arguing only a few weeks ago that Ritchie wasn't old at 36?Hound wrote:Yeah it’s too early to say on some. None have been an unqualified success yet. Everyone (including me tbf) said Williams is a good signing but he’s been injured more than he’s played, he’s 33. With our recent history on ‘experienced’ CBs he might not play another 5 games
Others have time to improve and will do I’m sure. I don’t think Burns has been awful tbh, done an ok job overall
Yes but with Ritchie I specifically said he was only a good signing if he was fully fit to play. And he wasn’t/isntSnowflake Royal wrote:Wasn’t it you arguing only a few weeks ago that Ritchie wasn't old at 36?Hound wrote:Yeah it’s too early to say on some. None have been an unqualified success yet. Everyone (including me tbf) said Williams is a good signing but he’s been injured more than he’s played, he’s 33. With our recent history on ‘experienced’ CBs he might not play another 5 games
Others have time to improve and will do I’m sure. I don’t think Burns has been awful tbh, done an ok job overall
Ritchie is out, hopefully not for long, through an impact injury. Recovery time may be affected somewhat, but the injury itself has nothing to do with age.Hound wrote:Yes but with Ritchie I specifically said he was only a good signing if he was fully fit to play. And he wasn’t/isntSnowflake Royal wrote:Wasn’t it you arguing only a few weeks ago that Ritchie wasn't old at 36?Hound wrote:Yeah it’s too early to say on some. None have been an unqualified success yet. Everyone (including me tbf) said Williams is a good signing but he’s been injured more than he’s played, he’s 33. With our recent history on ‘experienced’ CBs he might not play another 5 games
Others have time to improve and will do I’m sure. I don’t think Burns has been awful tbh, done an ok job overall
I haven’t an issue particularly with Williams age but it’s a short term fix in reality, and like I said we’ve not got a good recent record with experienced CBs
Overall though his contribution has been excellent though, no doubts. 3 wins, 3 draws, 1 defeat when he has started
He is the only one who has really dramatically improved the side after coming in. The only really good signing
Yes good point....probably only Knibbs & Wing in all honesty.stealthpapes wrote:So here's the list of players we signed in 2023-24
Harvey Knibbs
Sam Smith
Lewis Wing
Charlie Savage
Tivonge Rushesha
Harlee Dean
Tyler Bindon
David Button
Ben Elliott
John Ryan
Charlie Wellens
Jayden Wareham
Clinton Mola
Joel Pereira
Paul Mukairu
Dom Ballard
How many could be described as successes at November/December 2023?
Users browsing this forum: 78royal, Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 911 guests