Agreed he did well on Sunday and seemed to be on the same wavelength as Blakey which made for a few decent Blakey crosses.LUX wrote:I reckon he's underused this season. I'd have him in midfield for away games (maybe for Convey). He scores, he tackles, he defends.
Just what we need.
Release Bobby on "weaker" sides at the Madstad. But I'd still try and find a place for BG.
Personally I think that (with Hunt for Convey) would've been a better option against Arsenal to try and counter their exceptional midfield, especially once it was decided that Lita was not going to be playing.savage 4 england wrote:Something like this:
-----------------Hahnemann-----------
Murty----Sonko-----Ingimarsson---Shorey
-----------------Gunnarsson-----------------
-----------Harper-----------Sidwell----------
-----Seol-----------------------------Convey
---------------------Doyle---------------------
Didn't Wolves often play him on the left? Seemed that most of his poor games for them occured when he played there.Chaney wrote:as anyone ever considered using Seol on the left?
he is a good two footed player judging on the goals he scored this season.
it was noticable that both Chelsea and Arsenal starved him of service, its obvious that he was pinpointed as our main dangerman, so to play him on the left and Little on the right should be an option for SC to look at.
Me too - thought it showed something of a lack of imagination on SC's part not to go for that.Huntley & Palmer wrote: In fact, I was rather disappointed that we didn't go 3-5-2 in the second half against Arsenal as I think we may have stood a better chance of getting a goal
Not sure about that. Surely more sense to play 4-5-1 away at Arsenal for example and play for the draw.juanpablo wrote:4-5-1 is not the way to stay up, stick to our tried and tested game eg westham and wigan last season
we would be inviting pressure in a formation we havant tried recently
Spot on.John Madejski's Wallet wrote:BG has more tackling ability, airial ability, defensive nouse and shooting ability than Harps and Sidders put together. Criminally underused in midfield. We look so much more assured and solid when he comes into the middle
I also don't think he's as slow as he seems. He makes everything look slow, but on a flat run he can keep up with most players.
Depends on the opposition and the players we have available.juanpablo wrote:4-5-1 is not the way to stay up, stick to our tried and tested game eg westham and wigan last season
we would be inviting pressure in a formation we havant tried recently
11-0-0 might have kept the scoreline down a bit.Wax Jacket wrote:Me too - thought it showed something of a lack of imagination on SC's part not to go for that.Huntley & Palmer wrote: In fact, I was rather disappointed that we didn't go 3-5-2 in the second half against Arsenal as I think we may have stood a better chance of getting a goal
On admittedly scant evidence, I'd probably agree about Bikey, but I thought there was a huger improvement at RB in the second half against Arsenal. Not perfection, by any means, and he was caught out at least a couple of times, but who wasn't on Sunday? Unlike DLC, Gunnarsson was extremely assertive, mobile, tackled hard and got well-integrated with the attack. If a major strength of our team has been continuity, Brynjar seems to be the one guy we can bring in (maybe Hunt too) and not seem to lose any of our unity and balance.Huntley & Palmer wrote:He was torn apart in the Villa game when he replaced Sonko. I would much rather a specialist player there rather than a utility one. UDC or Bikey for me everytime.
Very hard to judge on Sundays performances DLC wasnt at fault for any of the goal and BG came on when the game was as good as over and Arsenal were fairly content passing the ball about without making much effort to press forward. Dont get me wrong I am a big BG fan but he was allowed more possession and to push on due to the game being already won.Arch wrote:On admittedly scant evidence, I'd probably agree about Bikey, but I thought there was a huger improvement at RB in the second half against Arsenal. Not perfection, by any means, and he was caught out at least a couple of times, but who wasn't on Sunday? Unlike DLC, Gunnarsson was extremely assertive, mobile, tackled hard and got well-integrated with the attack. If a major strength of our team has been continuity, Brynjar seems to be the one guy we can bring in (maybe Hunt too) and not seem to lose any of our unity and balance.Huntley & Palmer wrote:He was torn apart in the Villa game when he replaced Sonko. I would much rather a specialist player there rather than a utility one. UDC or Bikey for me everytime.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Richard and 115 guests