by Garry Mann » 25 Oct 2006 22:46
25 Oct 2006 22:46by Skin » 25 Oct 2006 23:26
25 Oct 2006 23:26Despite what we say about stewards and the 'regime' it really depends on what the alleged crime is.Garry Mann wrote:Or are they going to do what they normally do and stand by the club.
by Symposium » 26 Oct 2006 02:01
26 Oct 2006 02:01Well, I'd say seriously persistent offending should result in a formal/written warning... then escalating bans, perhaps. Regardless of people's opinions, if it's against the stadium's rules, the club needs to enforce it.[/quote]Skin wrote:Standing/swearing/taking photos/ are not banning offences in my opinion.
Agreed. Instant season-long ban. Any further instances should result in a lifetime ban.Skin wrote:Throwing objects and fighting, definite banning offences. No-one wants to see this behaviour.
by STAR Liaison » 26 Oct 2006 08:48
26 Oct 2006 08:48From what I was told on Sunday that is the reason for the banning orders. If anyone thinks they have been wrongly banned the club has already offered to show us the relevant CCTV footage, so I suspect they are confident that those banned are beyond the pale in most supporters eyes, but I am willing to watch the CCTV footage if anyone involved requests it.Symposium wrote:Agreed. Instant season-long ban. Any further instances should result in a lifetime ban.Skin wrote:Throwing objects and fighting, definite banning offences. No-one wants to see this behaviour.
There is an appeal procedure and the club is happy for STAR to be involved but do those banned want us involved? Not had any requests yet!M4 Junction 11 wrote:There should be a way to appeal and STAR should be there to help the fans.
by Skin » 26 Oct 2006 10:41
26 Oct 2006 10:41Symposium wrote: Regardless of people's opinions, if it's against the stadium's rules, the club needs to enforce it.
by M4 Junction 11 » 26 Oct 2006 11:09
26 Oct 2006 11:09Let's not forget the real issue here. The away support stand for 90 minutes, come onto the pitch to meet the players and throw projectiles and no action is taken. Photos are taken from the corporate area and no action is taken. Someone stands in Y25 or shouts for the team and the full force of the stewarts come down on them. If the club consistently enforced the rules we would all know where we stand.Skin wrote:Symposium wrote: Regardless of people's opinions, if it's against the stadium's rules, the club needs to enforce it.
Whose rule is it that we're not allowed to stand?
The stadiums or the F.A.'s?
What's the argument for this rule anyway. If you have a like minded section of the crowd that want to stand (in front of their seats) who decides they can't and why?
If anyone says health and safety: what stats are there for injuries to people standing in an all-seater stadium?
Can we not try and work with the club on this instead of against it?
Give us a (lenient approach to) standing section?!
by Wycombe Royal » 26 Oct 2006 11:13
26 Oct 2006 11:13And you know that for a fact do you?M4 Junction 11 wrote:The away support stand for 90 minutes, come onto the pitch to meet the players and throw projectiles and no action is taken.
STAR on another thread wrote: as the Met have been sent CCTV footage to identify the Chelsea supporters involved, so don't believe that they have got away with it and only Reading fans suffered.
by Skin » 26 Oct 2006 11:24
26 Oct 2006 11:24And you honestly believe the Met are really going to follow it up do you?Wycombe Royal wrote:And you know that for a fact do you?M4 Junction 11 wrote:The away support stand for 90 minutes, come onto the pitch to meet the players and throw projectiles and no action is taken.
STAR on another thread wrote: as the Met have been sent CCTV footage to identify the Chelsea supporters involved, so don't believe that they have got away with it and only Reading fans suffered.
by Wycombe Royal » 26 Oct 2006 11:28
26 Oct 2006 11:28That is neither the clubs or STAR's fault is it? It is up to the MET what they do with the footage.Skin wrote:And you honestly believe the Met are really going to follow it up do you?Wycombe Royal wrote:And you know that for a fact do you?M4 Junction 11 wrote:The away support stand for 90 minutes, come onto the pitch to meet the players and throw projectiles and no action is taken.
STAR on another thread wrote: as the Met have been sent CCTV footage to identify the Chelsea supporters involved, so don't believe that they have got away with it and only Reading fans suffered.
by Skin » 26 Oct 2006 11:38
26 Oct 2006 11:38Of course, but I don't believe that there was anywhere near the same effort made to identify away supporters for going onto the pitch, climbing into the home end, throwing stuff, as there was for identifying the home supporters for standing.Wycombe Royal wrote:That is neither the clubs or STAR's fault is it? It is up to the MET what they do with the footage.Skin wrote:And you honestly believe the Met are really going to follow it up do you?Wycombe Royal wrote: And you know that for a fact do you?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests