Is that a word?BillBrasky wrote:Wigan had an easier schedule up to this point last season. However, their first 3 matches in December were away to Liverpool, Chelsea and Man Utd and they lost all 3 by a total of 8 to 0. Reading have an easier stretch coming up but finish the year with Chelski and Manure. I think they have a pretty good chance at besting Wigan's season.
I could n´t care less what these twats say, if they were any good they would manage.Gentleman Jim wrote:Fair Play to LOLOLawrenson for holding his hands up and admitting what we already knew. I noticed that Shearer was conspicously silent having also tipped fortress Brammell lane to keep Sheff Utd up.
Maybe this is a turning point for pundits who won't just look at the name and write "UNDERDOG" nest to Reading. But who really cares what these people think anyway
Forbury Lion wrote:Mark LOLrencson said the new Wigan tag was an insult as we're doing a Reading not a Wigan.
Admitted everyone is shocked at our progress because they were ignorant and didn't know enough about our Championship form.
Let us not forget that Wigan gained promotion then signed almost an entire new squad. Our only notable signing so far has been Seol Ki Hyeon.
I think the Premiership will be taking more of an interest in the Championship from now on as we've proved that relatively cheap players can make the step up and hold their own.
There's an argument for saying every team below us in the league should look to follow our approach.Rob-Royal wrote:Forbury Lion wrote:Mark LOLrencson said the new Wigan tag was an insult as we're doing a Reading not a Wigan.
Admitted everyone is shocked at our progress because they were ignorant and didn't know enough about our Championship form.
Let us not forget that Wigan gained promotion then signed almost an entire new squad. Our only notable signing so far has been Seol Ki Hyeon.
I think the Premiership will be taking more of an interest in the Championship from now on as we've proved that relatively cheap players can make the step up and hold their own.
I think they already do to be fair, but depends which teams in the Prem we're referring to. We all know that there are at least 2 divisions in the Premiership and perhaps the gap between those outside the top 6-7 in the Premiership is not that great from the top 6 of the Championship.....which may explain why we're seeing more promoted teams holding their own unlike previous seasons.....?
Indeed it has been, that is a point I have tried to make to anyone who says we're "doing a Wigan". Wigan Athletic FC went about their success in a markedly different fashion to Reading FC. Wigan spent big and spent outside their means. I cannot see how Wigan can afford the high wages of players like Emilole Heskey et al with their minimalistic turnover! Crowds of 15 or 16k, hardly any marketability. Reading have spent prudently on the other hand, and within our means. We haven't broken the bank, even to keep our best players. Steve Sidwell Being the prime example. And I think we're a much healthier club for it.Forbury Lion wrote:Mark LOLrencson said the new Wigan tag was an insult as we're doing a Reading not a Wigan.
Yessireebassavage wrote:Is that a word?BillBrasky wrote:Wigan had an easier schedule up to this point last season. However, their first 3 matches in December were away to Liverpool, Chelsea and Man Utd and they lost all 3 by a total of 8 to 0. Reading have an easier stretch coming up but finish the year with Chelski and Manure. I think they have a pretty good chance at besting Wigan's season.
Is that a word?BillBrasky wrote:Yessireebassavage wrote:Is that a word?BillBrasky wrote:Wigan had an easier schedule up to this point last season. However, their first 3 matches in December were away to Liverpool, Chelsea and Man Utd and they lost all 3 by a total of 8 to 0. Reading have an easier stretch coming up but finish the year with Chelski and Manure. I think they have a pretty good chance at besting Wigan's season.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], CholseyRoyal, Google Adsense [Bot] and 199 guests