Good point - during the first half I was commenting how dangerous we were looking from crosses/corners, etc... We were causing them all sorts of problems......is in the 2nd half we didnt get a single cross in!!!
1st half was as it should be, spreading play and hunt/little getting to the corners and whipping balls in for attackers/midfielders to get onto.
where was this in the 2nd half? we just hoofed it, no composure and ball control was distinctly lacking. little recieved no decent ball so was unable to get crosses in and the midfield just folded.
you cant win a game in the premiership by just hoofing it upfield for doyle and seol to 'attempt' to do something with, you need to get it to the flanks at every oppurtunity.
Sharpy wrote: you cant win a game in the premiership by just hoofing it upfield for doyle and seol to 'attempt' to do something with, you need to get it to the flanks at every oppurtunity.
I'd say three were legal, just one wasn't allowed.Alan Partridge wrote:The reason why Reading lost yesterday I felt was this.
Reading scored 1 goal
Blackburn scored 2 (legal) goals.
That was the main reason for the defeat IMO.
brilliant. your so funnyAlan Partridge wrote:The reason why Reading lost yesterday I felt was this.
Reading scored 1 goal
Blackburn scored 2 (legal) goals.
That was the main reason for the defeat IMO.
And also very perceptiveM U R T Y wrote:brilliant. your so funnyAlan Partridge wrote:The reason why Reading lost yesterday I felt was this.
Reading scored 1 goal
Blackburn scored 2 (legal) goals.
That was the main reason for the defeat IMO.
and accurate too.M U R T Y wrote:brilliant. your so funnyAlan Partridge wrote:The reason why Reading lost yesterday I felt was this.
Reading scored 1 goal
Blackburn scored 2 (legal) goals.
That was the main reason for the defeat IMO.
but in a performance/match analysis basis, we distinctly lacked in flank play and thus crosses meaning we had virtually no goal threatdoylefan wrote:we lost becasue we had a bad day and blackburn scored more than us! nothing else
3 apostrophies in the word You're...West Stand Man wrote:and accurate too.M U R T Y wrote:brilliant. your so funnyAlan Partridge wrote:The reason why Reading lost yesterday I felt was this.
Reading scored 1 goal
Blackburn scored 2 (legal) goals.
That was the main reason for the defeat IMO.
oh, and it is 'you're' not your.
Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 195 guests