IF we beat United, I can guarantee that that thought won't even cross my mind. Not that they're even out of it anyway.Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
What's wrong with you? Are you saying you are debating over whether READING beating MANCHESTER UNITED is a good or bad thing, just because it may lead to a team who's manager once insulted our club winning the title?Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
LoyalRoyal13 wrote:What's wrong with you? Are you saying you are debating over whether READING beating MANCHESTER UNITED is a good or bad thing, just because it may lead to a team who's manager once insulted our club winning the title?Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
Stupid!!
#.....and we'll do it for Peter Mate'.....#Huntley & Palmer wrote:It's still ours for the taking
Perhaps we could make the West Ham game Streakers day if we beat Man U.Can just imagine 24000 streakers running riot at the mad stad.Not only would this add to the record breaking royals list of achievements but we might even get more coverage than the usual media babes.Bring it on.If we beat United, Ill streak at the West Ham match.
Now now, no need to be mean.LoyalRoyal13 wrote:What's wrong with you? Are you saying you are debating over whether READING beating MANCHESTER UNITED is a good or bad thing, just because it may lead to a team who's manager once insulted our club winning the title?Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
Stupid!!
Chnances are I'll still be intoxicated from the night before, so I'll be up for it. Might be a cold day though!higher wrote:URZZZZZZZZ wrote:Perhaps we could make the West Ham game Streakers day if we beat Man U.Can just imagine 24000 streakers running riot at the mad stad.Not only would this add to the record breaking royals list of achievements but we might even get more coverage than the usual media babes.Bring it on.If we beat United, Ill streak at the West Ham match.
Don't care. We won't beat them anyway.Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
why do you funking bother? thats so pesermistic we are statisically not quite as good, but in 90 mins anything can happen its all down to hope and a bit of luckbracknell loyal royal! wrote:Don't care. We won't beat them anyway.Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
So you think it's likely we'll beat Man United at Old Trafford on their current form? Get your head out of the clouds!Banjax wrote:why do you funking bother? thats so pesermistic we are statisically not quite as good, but in 90 mins anything can happen its all down to hope and a bit of luckbracknell loyal royal! wrote:Don't care. We won't beat them anyway.Farnborough Royal wrote:...we let CheLOL$ki back in the title race
i hope no one else thinks like you
Don't think he said that. He said we could beat them, if we go in thinking we have a chance. If we don't we won't.bracknell loyal royal! wrote:So you think it's likely we'll beat Man United at Old Trafford on their current form? Get your head out of the clouds!Banjax wrote:why do you funking bother? thats so pesermistic we are statisically not quite as good, but in 90 mins anything can happen its all down to hope and a bit of luckbracknell loyal royal! wrote: Don't care. We won't beat them anyway.
i hope no one else thinks like you
I'm not saying we don't have a chance, just stating it's extremely unlikely given the circumstances.Stranded wrote:Don't think he said that. He said we could beat them, if we go in thinking we have a chance. If we don't we won't.bracknell loyal royal! wrote:So you think it's likely we'll beat Man United at Old Trafford on their current form? Get your head out of the clouds!Banjax wrote: why do you funking bother? thats so pesermistic we are statisically not quite as good, but in 90 mins anything can happen its all down to hope and a bit of luck
i hope no one else thinks like you
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Fox Talbot, Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers, Semrush [Bot] and 327 guests