So? If contracts were only offered to regular first teamers (which Hunt currently is) then we might be a little short of players.Maguire wrote:Squad player at best.
Agreed - and I bet he's relatively lowly-paid, by Premier League standards.Wycombe Royal wrote:So? If contracts were only offered to regular first teamers (which Hunt currently is) then we might be a little short of players.Maguire wrote:Squad player at best.
He fully deserves it my opinion.
Don't start the Hughes debate again for God's sake Gordy!Gordons Cumming wrote:Anyone who gives 100% each game is worth his weight in gold.
Year extensions get given to players over 30.. based on past deals.I was there at Elm Park wrote:Has this been confirmed by the club? If so I'm a bit surprised that we've offered him a contract until 2009, would have expected just a year extension. Still I'm pleased for the lad and I hope he continues to improve in the same way he has at his time with the club so far.
I did wonder that too - I wonder if he's agreed to any "relegation clauses" in the contract. That would presumably have allowed us to extend it for longer than if the whole term of contract was at PL wage levels.I was there at Elm Park wrote:Has this been confirmed by the club? If so I'm a bit surprised that we've offered him a contract until 2009, would have expected just a year extension. Still I'm pleased for the lad and I hope he continues to improve in the same way he has at his time with the club so far.
perfectly good enough to be second/third choice winger and a desperation striker. Also means should he drop out of favour we'd get a fairly decent price for him from a championship side. I'm sure there would be plenty who'd pay reasonable money for him.Royalee wrote:Can't see this confirmed anywhere. Shocking news if it is I'm afraid. Always gives his all but nowhere near good enough long term.
Ian Royal wrote:perfectly good enough to be second/third choice winger and a desperation striker. Also means should he drop out of favour we'd get a fairly decent price for him from a championship side. I'm sure there would be plenty who'd pay reasonable money for him.Royalee wrote:Can't see this confirmed anywhere. Shocking news if it is I'm afraid. Always gives his all but nowhere near good enough long term.
So you agree with me.Wycombe Royal wrote:So? If contracts were only offered to regular first teamers (which Hunt currently is) then we might be a little short of players.Maguire wrote:Squad player at best.
He fully deserves it my opinion.
Unless he improves or we suffer alot of injuries I can't see him being selected for our Champions League final squad.Maguire wrote:I hope he can't get anywhere near the Reading team in 2.5 years time
We have more important areas to improve than left wing, especially with convey coming back. it is very far from a priority and keeping hunty at the club, on probably fairly low wages is a good idea.Royalee wrote:Ian Royal wrote:perfectly good enough to be second/third choice winger and a desperation striker. Also means should he drop out of favour we'd get a fairly decent price for him from a championship side. I'm sure there would be plenty who'd pay reasonable money for him.Royalee wrote:Can't see this confirmed anywhere. Shocking news if it is I'm afraid. Always gives his all but nowhere near good enough long term.
...Or we could do what any other Premiership club would be doing and look to improve our squad. If it hadn't been for the vast improvement in Lita's form and Hunt's dropping over Xmas, we'd have been stuffed at both the big boys. The best games Hunt's had this season have been Charlton and West Ham, and both teams were shocking. We lack width and creativity when he plays against teams who can defend properly I'm afraid.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Fox Talbot, Royals and Racers, Semrush [Bot] and 324 guests