not seen the plansPieEater wrote:where will all these people go?

A certain amount of information, so far, but as plans are still being made nothing is for certain yet.PieEater wrote:Whilst I think most supporters are in favour of the stadium expansion, there will inevitably be some disruption to supporters if construction takes place during the season and possibly some existing seating will be removed.
Have STAR received any information from RFC about how this would be handled?
If seats that are removed as a result of the changes, it would be good to get STAR support to ensure the new seating is allocated fairly. I notice on the plans there appears to be a new open area between Y22 and Y24 that is where existing seating is (about row X to CC), where will all these people go?
How about restarting row numbers from the first row after the missing rows back in those blocks, so rather than a massive move for a 100 people, say 400 move 3 rows back? (and yes I think I am affected by this new area)STAR Campaigns wrote:The open area you talk of will be properly thought-out disabled areas (i.e. raised for wheelchairs to preserve sightlines) - no talk yet of where people who are moved will go to, but I'd certainly hope that they'll get offered first choice on where to relocate to.
No plans yet on that score, but I'm pretty certain we'll be involved in the discussions surrounding that.
you miserable buggerPieEater wrote:How about restarting row numbers from the first row after the missing rows back in those blocks, so rather than a massive move for a 100 people, say 400 move 3 rows back? (and yes I think I am affected by this new area)STAR Campaigns wrote:The open area you talk of will be properly thought-out disabled areas (i.e. raised for wheelchairs to preserve sightlines) - no talk yet of where people who are moved will go to, but I'd certainly hope that they'll get offered first choice on where to relocate to.
No plans yet on that score, but I'm pretty certain we'll be involved in the discussions surrounding that.
In this doc:
http://62.6.180.132/AnitePublicDocs/00012767.pdf pg 8, it is refered to as disabled area, but in this doc http://62.6.180.132/AnitePublicDocs/00012768.pdf it is refered to as Matchday hospitality suite. Either way I am not at all happy at the prospect of moving my seat to accomodate it
Don't you have an allocated seat for your seat ticket?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Since when has it been YOUR seat?
Still not technically your seat though (as in you haven't bought the piece of plastic from the club, just the right to use it for a season). - don't worry, he's Coley Park's equivalent of Mr PedanticPieEater wrote:Don't you have an allocated seat for your seat ticket?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Since when has it been YOUR seat?
How many seasons have you bought your season ticket for?PieEater wrote:Don't you have an allocated seat for your seat ticket?AthleticoSpizz wrote:Since when has it been YOUR seat?
Correct - so those displaced fans will, presumably, have the first choice of all other vacanct seats - i.e. the extension and any others seats not renewed.Forbury Lion wrote:Presumably the seat removal lower in the stands won't take place until the upper section is completed, otherwise there may be evicted fans with nowhere to sit.
Dirk, so why cant they fix up the existing disabled area?Dirk Gently wrote:Correct - so those displaced fans will, presumably, have the first choice of all other vacanct seats - i.e. the extension and any others seats not renewed.Forbury Lion wrote:Presumably the seat removal lower in the stands won't take place until the upper section is completed, otherwise there may be evicted fans with nowhere to sit.
Or they can give them chairs with wheels on to sit inDirk Gently wrote:Correct - so those displaced fans will, presumably, have the first choice of all other vacanct seats - i.e. the extension and any others seats not renewed.Forbury Lion wrote:Presumably the seat removal lower in the stands won't take place until the upper section is completed, otherwise there may be evicted fans with nowhere to sit.
Surely its easier to take out a couple of rows of seats in the existing areas than move 200 people?Dirk Gently wrote:That would require either raising the current level or taking oyt a couple of rows of seats.
I think they've just decided that the extension gives them a chance to do things properly, from scratch, with the new disabled areas.
Don't know -I hope they're doing both, actually, and bringing the exsiting disabled areas up to spec as well as adding the new ones.PieEater wrote:Surely its easier to take out a couple of rows of seats in the existing areas than move 200 people?Dirk Gently wrote:That would require either raising the current level or taking oyt a couple of rows of seats.
I think they've just decided that the extension gives them a chance to do things properly, from scratch, with the new disabled areas.
Is that temporary of permanent?PieEater wrote:But reducing the number of parking spaces available, something is not tying up?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests