It is certainly on our agenda for the next management meetingroyal goof wrote:STAR, Survey results have been announced on the Official Website.
It mentions a number of positive responses which is great and which the club should be praised for.
However, it also mentions some negatives which scored pretty poorly compared to other clubs in the league. This refers to the price of food & drink (quality could also be an issue) and telephone contact.
Would STAR be able to get a response from the club on what they propose to do to rectify these negative areas please?
Laugh ?RG30 wrote:What made me laugh was how the club carried out an independant research at the Portsmouth game, yet by my reckoning 3 of the named had links with STAR, them being on the board. Any coincidence?
Just scrap the 0870 £££ £££ no.66DD wrote:The figures given for the average telephone response times would be more meaningful if they disclosed whether it was the mean, median or mode averages. Also what the range was and the upper and lower quartiles. Some correlation to time of day, number of staff on duty and where in the sales cycle of tickets each day was would help with an analysis.
That being said the average waiting times don't look too bad: but then again there are lies, damned lies and statistics.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 9 guests