by Alan Partridge » 17 Apr 2008 10:38
17 Apr 2008 10:38If he won't sit on the bench at City why would he want to sit on the bench at Reading?Alan Partridge wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/7351151.stm
by Dirk Gently » 17 Apr 2008 10:50
17 Apr 2008 10:50by Alan Partridge » 17 Apr 2008 10:52
17 Apr 2008 10:52He's 21.Dirk Gently wrote:Hmmm, much too impetuous - has half a dozen rushes of blood to the head every game. Yes he makes some great stops but he also gives too many away through going for what he shouldn't.
Good shot-stopper, lousy judgement.
by Big Ern » 17 Apr 2008 10:58
17 Apr 2008 10:58by Coppelled Streets » 17 Apr 2008 12:13
17 Apr 2008 12:13Exactly, but enough of Hahnemann.Dirk Gently wrote:Hmmm, much too impetuous - has half a dozen rushes of blood to the head every game. Yes he makes some great stops but he also gives too many away through going for what he shouldn't.
Good shot-stopper, lousy judgement.
by Ian Royal » 17 Apr 2008 21:28
17 Apr 2008 21:28by Royal Rother » 17 Apr 2008 22:22
17 Apr 2008 22:22Joe Hart is only 20.Alan Partridge wrote:He's 21.Dirk Gently wrote:Hmmm, much too impetuous - has half a dozen rushes of blood to the head every game. Yes he makes some great stops but he also gives too many away through going for what he shouldn't.
Good shot-stopper, lousy judgement.
He's not going to be the finished article yet but his loan spells have been mightily impressive and he will get better with games. He MAY start as second fiddle to Hahnemann who only has 1 year left, is 36 and already hinted about a return to the States. He would be far more likely to take his place than 22 year old Joe Hart's at City.
by The 17 Bus » 18 Apr 2008 07:59
18 Apr 2008 07:59And there is the rub, if we dont allow Fed a chance of a run in the team we will never know how good he might be, a new keeper may not be required, possibly swapping what we have might be worth a try at some point, but probably next season.Royal Rother wrote:Joe Hart is only 20.Alan Partridge wrote:He's 21.Dirk Gently wrote:Hmmm, much too impetuous - has half a dozen rushes of blood to the head every game. Yes he makes some great stops but he also gives too many away through going for what he shouldn't.
Good shot-stopper, lousy judgement.
He's not going to be the finished article yet but his loan spells have been mightily impressive and he will get better with games. He MAY start as second fiddle to Hahnemann who only has 1 year left, is 36 and already hinted about a return to the States. He would be far more likely to take his place than 22 year old Joe Hart's at City.
I don't rate Schmeichel any higher than Federici.
by rg6royal » 18 Apr 2008 20:21
18 Apr 2008 20:21by Southbank Old Boy » 19 Apr 2008 08:51
19 Apr 2008 08:51by chilipepper91 » 19 Apr 2008 12:37
19 Apr 2008 12:37Agreed, definitely a brilliant shot stopper, the decision - making may not be completely up to scratch but that will come as he gets more games under his belt.chilipepper91 wrote:Eriksson's said that Hart is his number 1. Whatever happened to Isaksson? I'd be happy to see Schmeichel here - he looked alright in the few games he played for City...
by bobby1413 » 20 Apr 2008 00:35
20 Apr 2008 00:35That Friday Feeling wrote:If he won't sit on the bench at City why would he want to sit on the bench at Reading?Alan Partridge wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_city/7351151.stm
by Royal Rother » 20 Apr 2008 04:17
20 Apr 2008 04:17Did you realise that you were describing Federici perfectly?Doyler wrote:Agreed, definitely a brilliant shot stopper, the decision - making may not be completely up to scratch but that will come as he gets more games under his belt.chilipepper91 wrote:Eriksson's said that Hart is his number 1. Whatever happened to Isaksson? I'd be happy to see Schmeichel here - he looked alright in the few games he played for City...
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 76 guests