I always wonder what sort of club someone would be looking for.Edit: I'm regularly surprised by the number of people who think we're an ‘attractive’ purchase. We have no international profile, a small traditional supporter base, and no old town-centre stadium that could be sold to realise increasing land prices. We have one attractive feature – we’re in the Premiership. And that’s the most ephemeral attribute for a club like us.
We're very lucky to have Madjeski, but I think Fayed has been pretty good for Fulham too. He's had his moments along the way, but he's taken them on a very similar journey to the one Mr M has provided for us.ElmParker wrote:True.
My worry is that, rather than an asset stripper or an investor we’d get the other (and worst) kind of billionaire: an egomaniac. Fayed, Abramovich, Romanov etc.
How many successful clubs are actually owned by rich local individuals who love the club? After Reading, maybe only Newcastle.
We really don’t know how lucky we are.
but we wouldnt need 15k more STH.ElmParker wrote:I'm not an economist, but I'm sceptical about the ability of Reading to either:
1. Attract 15,000 new paying STHs without massive investment in playing staff.
2. Continue to earn a tidy profit by reliably finishing 15th without spending money on players and without risking relegation, and associated loss of income and investment value.
I just can’t see Reading being a safe, profitable investment for a business.
by strap » 01 May 2008 23:58
01 May 2008 23:58by Platypuss » 02 May 2008 00:02
02 May 2008 00:02by strap » 02 May 2008 00:20
02 May 2008 00:20by West Stand Man » 02 May 2008 19:43
02 May 2008 19:43That is assuming that the Mail hasn't just copied the story from the Sun or NOTW in the first place. The trouble with so many of these stories is that they loop and become self professing.strap wrote:I've got to stop surfing late at night ....
Is this another wind-up or is it of some substance? If these guys were sniffing around Spurs some time ago, I would have thought RFC would be a more attractive proposition that Sheff W or Soton.
Depends if they want a Championship club or one in Divsion 1!?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... to=newsnow
(I suppose The Mail is marginally better than The Sun.)
by Royal Rother » 04 May 2008 08:12
04 May 2008 08:12Self perpetuating?West Stand Man wrote:That is assuming that the Mail hasn't just copied the story from the Sun or NOTW in the first place. The trouble with so many of these stories is that they loop and become self professing.strap wrote:I've got to stop surfing late at night ....
Is this another wind-up or is it of some substance? If these guys were sniffing around Spurs some time ago, I would have thought RFC would be a more attractive proposition that Sheff W or Soton.
Depends if they want a Championship club or one in Divsion 1!?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... to=newsnow
(I suppose The Mail is marginally better than The Sun.)
by Dirk Gently » 05 May 2008 18:32
05 May 2008 18:32Self-fulfilling?Royal Rother wrote:Self perpetuating?West Stand Man wrote:That is assuming that the Mail hasn't just copied the story from the Sun or NOTW in the first place. The trouble with so many of these stories is that they loop and become self professing.strap wrote:I've got to stop surfing late at night ....
Is this another wind-up or is it of some substance? If these guys were sniffing around Spurs some time ago, I would have thought RFC would be a more attractive proposition that Sheff W or Soton.
Depends if they want a Championship club or one in Divsion 1!?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... to=newsnow
(I suppose The Mail is marginally better than The Sun.)
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 76 guests